Towards the Politicization of Artificial Intelligence in the EU? External Influences and Internal Dynamics

• Authors: Ilona Poseliuzhna

Title variants

PL

W kierunku polityzacji sztucznej inteligencji w Unii Europejskiej? Zewnętrzne wpływy i wewnętrzna dynamika

Abstracts

PL

W artykule zbadano polityzację sztucznej inteligencji (AI) w UE poprzez wzajemne oddziaływanie dynamiki wewnętrznej i wpływów zewnętrznych (USA i Chin). Badanie ma na celu identyfikację wczesnych oznak polityzacji unijnej debaty na temat AI i porównanie modelu polityki UE w zakresie AI z modelami rozwijanymi w USA i Chinach. Hipoteza zakłada, że debata publiczna w UE na temat AI ulega polityzacji, kształtowana zarówno przez czynniki wewnętrzne, jak i reakcje na zewnętrzne modele polityki AI. W badaniu wykorzystano porównawczą analizę polityki i analizę treści. Wyniki wskazują na rosnącą wagę AI w dyskursie publicznym, o czym świadczy zwiększone zainteresowanie mediów i zaangażowanie szerokiego grona podmiotów. Jednakże znaczna polaryzacja w tej kwestii nie jest widoczna. W badaniu podkreślono także strategiczną reakcję UE na zewnętrzne modele polityki AI. UE kładzie nacisk na równowagę między innowacjami, suwerennością cyfrową oraz ochroną wartości demokratycznych i praw podstawowych.

EN

This paper explores the politicization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the EU, examining the interplay between internal dynamics and external influences, particularly from the United States and China. The study aims to identify early signs of politicization in the EU’s AI debate and compare the EU’s AI policy model with those of the US and China. The hypothesis posits that EU public debate on AI is politicized, shaped by both internal factors and responses to external AI policy models. The research uses comparative policy analysis and content analysis. Findings indicate a growing salience of AI in public discourse, evidenced by increased media attention and engagement from a wide range of actors. However, significant polarization on AI issues within the EU is not yet evident. The study also highlights the EU’s strategic response to external AI models, emphasizing a balance between innovation, digital sovereignty, and the protection of democratic values and fundamental rights.

Keywords

EN

artificial intelligence; AI policy; politicization; European Union; AI governance

PL

sztuczna inteligencja; polityka sztucznej inteligencji; polityzacja; Unia Europejska; zarządzanie sztuczną inteligencją

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej
• Year: 2023
• Issue: 17
• Pages: 379-391

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Ilona Poseliuzhna

• Jagiellonian University

• https://orcid.org/0000000334141082

References

• Algorithm Watch (2023), EU legislators must close dangerous loophole in AI Act, Statement, 7.09.2023, https://algorithmwatch.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/20230728_AI-Act_Article-6-NGO-statement-draft_-AlgorithmWatch.pdf.
• Allison G., Schmidt E. (2020), Is China Beating the US to AI Supremacy?, Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/AISupremacy.pdf.
• Bertuzzi L. (2022), The US unofficial position on upcoming EU Artificial Intelligence rules, Euractiv, 24.10.2022, https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/the-us-unofficial-position-on-upcoming-eu-artificial-intelligence-rules/.
• Blumenthal R. (2023), Blumenthal & Hawley announce bipartisan framework on artificial intelligence legislation, Richard Blumenthal’s website, 8.09.2023, https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/blumenthal-and-hawley-announce-bipartisan-framework-on-artificial-intelligence-legislation.
• Bradford A. (2023), Digital empires: The global battle to regulate technology, New York.
• Brennen J. S., Howard P. N., Nielsen R. K. (2018), An industry-led debate: How UK media cover artificial intelligence, RISJ Fact-Sheet.
• Caunes K. (ed.) (2023), Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Values Index 2022, Center for AI and Digital Policy, Washington DC.
• Cave S., Dihal K. (2019), Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality, “Nature machine intelligence”, no. 1(2).
• Chubb J., Reed D., Cowling P. (2022), Expert views about missing AI narratives: is there an AI story crisis?, “AI & society”, doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01548-2.
• Council of the European Union (2023), ChatGPT in the Public Sector – overhyped or overlooked?, 24.04.2023, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/63818/art-paper-chatgpt-in-the-public-sector-overhyped-or-overlooked-24-april-2023_ext.pdf.
• De Bruycker I. (2017), Politicization and the public interest: When do the elites in Brussels address public interests in EU policy debates?, “European Union Politics”, no. 18(4).
• Decision 2022/2481. Decision (EU) 2022/2481 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 establishing the Digital Decade Policy Programme 2030 (Text with EEA relevance).
• De Wilde P. (2011), No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration, “Journal of European integration”, no. 33(5).
• De Wilde P., Leupold A., Schmidtke H. (2016), Introduction: The differentiated politicisation of European governance, “West European Politics”, no. 39(1).
• EDRI (2023), EU Trilogues: The AI Act must protect people’s rights, Statement, 12.07.2023, https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Civil-society-AI-Act-trilogues-statement.pdf.
• European Commission (2018), Artificial Intelligence for Europe, COM/2018/237 final.
• European Commission (2020), White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust, COM (2020) 65 final.
• European Commission (2021a), Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts, COM(2021) 206 final.
• European Commission (2021b), European citizens’ knowledge and attitudes towards science and technology: report, Directorate-General for Communication.
• European Parliament (2023), Artificial Intelligence Act: deal on comprehensive rules for trustworthy AI, 9.12.2023, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231206IPR15699/artificial-intelligence-act-deal-on-comprehensive-rules-for-trustworthy-ai.
• Filgueiras F. (2022), Artificial intelligence policy regimes: comparing politics and policy to national strategies for artificial intelligence, “Global Perspectives”, no. 3(1).
• Glukhov V. (2023), Responsible AI: Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, OpenAI [LinkedIn post], LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/responsible-ai-microsoft-alphabet-meta-openai-vacslav-glukhov/.
• Góra M. (2019), Legitymizacja i kontestacja polityki zagranicznej Unii Europejskiej na przykładzie polityki rozszerzenia i Europejskiej Polityki Sąsiedztwa, Kraków.
• Guillou C., Piquard A. (2023), French far-right leader seeks to take advantage of AI debate, “Le Monde”, 2.10.2023, https://www.lemonde.fr/en/politics/article/2023/10/02/french-far-right-leader-tries-to-take-advantage-of-ai-debate_6143014_5.html.
• Hackenesch C., Bergmann J., Orbie J. (2021), Development policy under fire? The politicization of European external relations, “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, no. 59(1).
• Heidebrecht S. (2023), From Market Liberalism to Public Intervention: Digital Sovereignty and Changing European Union Digital Single Market Governance, “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, no. 62(1).
• Jaakkola M. (2023), Reporting on artificial intelligence: a handbook for journalism educators, UNESCO, Paris.
• Jones B., Jones R., Luger E. (2022), AI ‘Everywhere and Nowhere’: Addressing the AI Intelligibility Problem in Public Service Journalism, “Digital Journalism”, no. 10(10).
• Jungherr A. (2023), Artificial intelligence and democracy: A conceptual framework, “Social media+ society”, no. 9(3).
• Kalpokas I., Kalpokienė J. (eds.) (2023), Intelligent and Autonomous: Transforming Values in the Face of Technology, Leiden.
• Kriesi H., Tresch A., Jochum M. (2007), Going public in the European Union: Action repertoires of Western European collective political actors, “Comparative Political Studies”, no. 40(1).
• MacCarthy M. (2023), The US and its allies should engage with China on AI law and policy, The Brookings Institution, 19.10.2023, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-us-and-its-allies-should-engage-with-china-on-ai-law-and-policy/.
• Maricut-Akbik A. (2019), EU politicization beyond the Euro crisis: immigration crises and the politicization of free movement of people, “Comparative European Politics”, no. 17.
• Mazzucato M., Schaake M., Krier S., Entsminger J. (2022), Governing artificial intelligence in the public interest, UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose, Working Paper Series (IIPP WP 2020-12), https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/wp2022-12.
• Moldicz C. (2022), China, the USA and Technological Supremacy in Europe, London–New York.
• Nguyen D., Hekman E. (2022), The news framing of artificial intelligence: a critical exploration of how media discourses make sense of automation, “AI & SOCIETY”, no. 1.
• Poseliuzhna I. (2023), AI talent competition: Challenges to the United States’ technological superiority, in: Intelligent and Autonomous: Transforming Values in the Face of Technology, ed. by I. Kalpokas, J. Kalpokienė, Leiden.
• Roe J., Perkins M. (2023), ‘What they’re not telling you about ChatGPT’: exploring the discourse of AI in UK news media headlines, “Humanities and Social Sciences Communications”, no. 10(1).
• Roff H. M. (2019), The frame problem: The AI “arms race” isn’t one, “Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists”, no. 75(3).
• Rotenberg M. (2023), Everything. Everywhere. All at Once: AI Policy When Congress Returns, “Communications of the ACM”, 24.08.2023, https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/275742-everything-everywhere-all-at-once-ai-policy-when-congress-returns/fulltext#_ednref8.
• Sayler K. M. (2020), Artificial intelligence and national security, R45178, U.S. Congressional Research Service, 26.08.2020, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45178/8.
• Sheehan M. (2023), China’s AI regulations and how they get made, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 10.07.2023, https://carnegieendowment.org/files/202307-Sheehan_Chinese%20AI%20gov.pdf.
• Schmitter P. C. (1969), Three neo-functional hypotheses about international integration, “International Organization”, no. 23(1).
• Schyns C. (2023), The lobbying ghost in the machine, Corporate Europe Observatory, https://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/The%20Lobbying%20Ghost%20in%20the%20Machine.pdf.
• Schyns C., Vranken B. (2023), Big Tech’s attempt to water down the EU AI act revealed, EUobserver, 23.02.2023, https://euobserver.com/opinion/156751.
• Stevens F., De Bruycker I. (2020), Influence, affluence and media salience: Economic resources and lobbying influence in the European Union, “European Union Politics”, no. 21(4).
• Stierle S. (2023), KI-Regulierung: Verspäteter Zoff in der Bundesregierung, „Tagesspiegel Background“, 17.01.2023, https://background.tagesspiegel.de/digitalisierung/ki-regulierung-verspaeteter-zoff-in-der-bundesregierung.
• The White House (2023a), Fact sheet: Biden-Harris Administration secures voluntary commitments from leading artificial intelligence companies to manage the risks posed by AI, 21.07.2023, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/21/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-secures-voluntary-commitments-from-leading-artificial-intelligence-companies-to-manage-the-risks-posed-by-ai/.
• The White House (2023b), Fact sheet: President Biden issues executive order on safe, secure, and trustworthy artificial intelligence, 30.10.2023, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/.
• Ulnicane I. (2022), Artificial Intelligence in the European Union: Policy, ethics and regulation, in: The Routledge handbook of European integrations, ed. by T. Hoerber, G. Weber, I. Cabras, Abingdon–New York.
• United Nations Secretary-General (2023), Press remarks launching high-level advisory body on artificial intelligence, [Speech transcript], 26.10.2023, United Nations, https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sgs_remarks_announcing_high-level_advisory_body_artificial_intelligence_26_october_2023.pdf.
• von Essen L., Ossewaarde M. (2023), Artificial intelligence and European identity: the European Commission’s struggle for reconciliation, “European Politics and Society”,
• Welch N., Schneider J. (2023), China’s censors are afraid of what chatbots might say, “Foreign Policy”, 3.03.2023, https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/03/china-censors-chatbots-artificial-intelligence/.
• Wodecki B. (2023), Top European Companies: ‘Serious Concerns’ About EU AI Act, 3.07.2023, AI Business, https://aibusiness.com/nlp/top-european-companies-serious-concerns-about-eu- ai-act.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/rie.2023.17.23

Biblioteka Nauki

31233402