Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 81 | 2 | 177-190

Article title

The concept of Index for the Assessment of Regulations' Significance (IARS) in regulatory impact evaluation

Content

Title variants

PL
The concept of Index for the Assessment of Regulations' Significance (IARS) in regulatory impact evaluation

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
This article aims to present the concept of the Index for the Assessment of Regulations’ Significance as a tool used in parliamentary regulatory impact assessment, with a special focus on expost assessment. The Index is an element of the broadly defined economic analysis of law, which can facilitate a more effective scrutiny of parliamentary lawmaking. The Index also enables theRIA (Regulatory Impact Assessment) to be verified by the act originator at the stage of the ex-ante regulatory impact assessment. Furthermore, the Index can also serve as a tool for conducting an analysis of the overall legislation process employed in parliament over a given period of time, on the basis of the adopted legal and substantive criteria.
PL
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie koncepcji wskaźnika oceny istotności regulacji jako narzędzia do wykorzystania w parlamentarnej ocenie skutków regulacji, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem oceny ex-post. Wskaźnik jest elementem szeroko rozumianej ekonomicznej analizy prawa, która umożliwić może skuteczniejszą kontrolę stanowienia prawa przez parlamenty. Wskaźnik umożliwia także weryfikację RIA przeprowadzonego przez projektodawcę na etapie oceny skutków regulacji ex-ante. Ponadto wskaźnik służyć może do przeprowadzenia analizy całego procesu legislacyjnego w parlamencie w danym okresie na podstawie przyjętych kryteriów prawnych i merytorycznych.

Year

Volume

81

Issue

2

Pages

177-190

Physical description

Dates

published
2019-06-28

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu

References

  • BAS (2015). Methodological assumptions for ex-ante and ex-post analysis. Bureau of Research, Chancellery of the Sejm 2015, working group research – document unpublished (Polish version: Założenia metodologiczne do analizy ex-ante i ex-post, prace zespołu roboczego ds. OSR pod kierunkiem G. Gołębiowskiego).
  • COM(2010)543 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Smart Regulation in the European Union, Brussels, 8.10.2010.
  • COM(2012)746 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU Regulatory Fitness.
  • Cooter, R., Ulen, T. (2008). Law and Economics. Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston−San Francisco−New-York−London−Toronto−Sydney−Tokyo−Singapore−Madrid−Mexico City−Munich−Paris−Cape Town−Hong Kong− Montreal.
  • ECPRD (2016). Member States’ parliamentary practice and organization regarding impact assessment (ex-ante) and evaluation (ex-post). European Parliament, Request 2832.
  • OECD (2012). Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and Governance. Paris.
  • OECD (2015). Government at a Glance 2015. Paris.
  • Pearson, H. (1997). Origins of Law and Economics. The Economists’ New Science of Law Movement 1830–1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Posner, R.A. (2003). Economic Analysis of Law. New York: Aspen Publishers.
  • Rowley, Ch.K. (1989). Public choice and the economic analysis of law, [in:] N. Mercuro (ed.), Law and Economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_rpeis_2019_81_2_13
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.