Enculturation and humanization in education: pro et contra

• Authors: Irina Kyshtymova

Title variants

PL

Enculturation and humanization in education: pro et contra

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The author substantiates the proposition of productiveness of enculturation as a principle of organization of educational environment. Furthermore, a comparative analysis with humanization as the mainstream of educational transformation is performed.     

PL

The author substantiates the proposition of productiveness of enculturation as a principle of organization of educational environment. Furthermore, a comparative analysis with humanization as the mainstream of educational transformation is performed.

Keywords

PL

education; development; humanization; enculturation; internalization; reference culture

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studia Europaea Gnesnensia
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 10
• Pages: 137-150

Dates

published

2014-01-01

Contributors

author

Irina Kyshtymova

• Irkutsk State University

References

• Ahutin, A.V.,Ontologichieskaia dialogika kultury V.S. Biblera, [in:] Teoretichieskaia kulturologia, Moscow 2005, pp. 34-45.
• Bart, R., S/Z, Moscow 1994.
• Basset, T. Robert, Eduction for the Individual: A Humanistic Introduction, New York 1978.
• Bibler, W.S., Ot naukoucheniia k logikie kultury: dva filosofskih vviedienia v dvadcat’ piervyy viek, Moscow 1991.
• Cole, М., Cultural Psychology: a once and future discipline, London 1996.
• Didenko, W. D., Duchovaia realnost’ i iskusstvo: eststika prieobrazheniia, Moscow 2005.
• Doltey, W., Opisatielnaya psichologia, [in:] Istoria psichologii: teksty, Moscow 1992, pp. 319-346.
• Drach, G. W., Kulturologia, Rostov na Donu 2004.
• Eco, U., Zamietki na poliah „Imieni rozy”, Imia Rozy, Moscow 1989.
• ---
• Engelmann, S., Carnine, D., Theory of Instruction: Principles and Applications, New York 1982.
• Frank, S., Nieprochitannoie: stat’i, pis’ma, vospominania, Moscow 2001.
• Herskovits, M.J., Man and his works: the science of cultural anthropology, New York 1948.
• Kosikov, G. K., Ideologiia. Konnotacia, after: R. Bart, S/Z, Moscow 1994.
• Kravchenko, A. I., Kulturologia, Moscow 2001.
• Мaслоу, А.Г., Dalnie priediely chieloviechieskoy psychiki, St. Petersburg 2007.
• Macumoto, D., Psichologia i kultura, St. Petersburg 2002.
• Mikhailov, F. T., Problema metoda kulturno-istoricheskoi psichologii, Kulturno-istoricheskaia psichologia, 2. 2005.
• Mihaylov, F.T., Kultura kak porozhdaiushchieie chielovieka otnoshenie, [in:] Teoreticheskaia kulturologia, Moscow 2005, pp. 124-143.
• Rogozin, V. M., Lichnost’ i jejo izuchenie, Moscow 2004.
• Rodzhers, K., Kliient – centrirovannaia tierapiia, Moscow 1997.
• Shadrikov, V.D., Proishozhdienie chieloviechnosti, Moscow 1999.
• Shpranger , E., Dva vida psichologii, [in:] Istoria psichologii: teksty, Moscow 1992, pp. 347-361.
• Wygotskiy, L.S., Istoria kulturnogo razvitia normalnogo i nienormalnogo rebionka, Psichologia lichnosti. Teksty, Moscow 1982.
• ---
• Zen’kovskiy, V.V., Pedegogoka, Klin 2002.
• Zinchenko, W.P., Morgunov, E.B., Chieloviek razvivaiushchisia: ocherki rossijskoi psichologii, Moscow 1994.
• Zinchenko, W.P., Ochen’ subektyvnie zamietki o psichologicheskoi diagnostike, Chieloviek 1, 2001.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/seg.2014.10.7