Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 15 | 35-42

Article title

Linguistic landscape research: some methodological remarks

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Linguistic landscape research: some methodological remarks

Keywords

Year

Issue

15

Pages

35-42

Physical description

Dates

published
2018-08-14

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

References

  • Alm, C.O. 2003. “English in the Ecuadorian commercial context”. World Englishes 22. 143-158.
  • Backhaus, P. 2005. “Signs of multilingualism in Tokyo - a diachronic look at the linguistic landscape”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 175/176. 103-121.
  • Backhaus, P. 2006. “Multilingualism in Tokyo: a look into the linguistic landscape”. In: Gorter, D. (Ed.). Linguistic landscape: a new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 52-66.
  • Backhaus, P. 2007. Linguistic landscapes: a comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon/Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
  • Backhaus, P. 2009. “Rules and regulations in linguistic landscaping: a comparative perspective”. In: Shohamy, E. and D. Gorter (Eds.). Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery. London/New York: Routledge. 157-172.
  • Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M.H. and N. Trumper-Hecht. 2006. “Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: the case of Israel”. In: Gorter, D. (Ed.). Linguistic landscape: new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 7-30.
  • Ben-Rafael, E. 2009. “A sociological approach to the study of linguistic landscapes”. In: Shohamy, E. and D. Gorter (Eds.). Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery. London/New York: Routledge. 40-54.
  • Cenoz, J. and D. Gorter. 2006. “Linguistic landscape and minority languages”. In: Gorter, D. (Ed.). Linguistic landscape: a new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 67-80.
  • Coulmas, F. 2009. “Linguistic landscaping and the seed of the public sphere”. In: Shohamy, E. and D. Gorter (Eds.). Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery. London/New York: Routledge. 13-24.
  • Coupland, N. and P. Garrett. 2010. “Linguistic landscapes, discursive frames and metacultural performance: the case of Welsh Patagonia”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 205. 7-36.
  • Curtin, M. 2009. “Languages on display: indexical signs, identities and the linguistic landscape of Taipei”. In: Shohamy, E. and D. Gorter (Eds.). Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery. London/New York: Routledge. 221-237.
  • Gorter, D. (Ed.). 2006c. Linguistic landscape: a new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Grześkowiak, M. 2010. Trans-city or inter-city? The co-existence of majority and minority languages in the urban space: a comparative case study of London and Warsaw linguistic landscapes. Poznań: Katedra Ekokomunikacji UAM.
  • Huebner, T. 2006. “Bangkok's linguistic landscapes: environmental print, codemixing and lanugage change”. In: Gorter, D. (Ed.). Linguistic landcape: a new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 31-51.
  • Hult, F. M. 2009. “Language ecology and linguistic landscape analysis”. In: E. Shohamy, E. and D. Gorter (Eds.). Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery. London/New York: Routledge. 88-104.
  • Landry, R. and R.Y. Bourhis. 1997. “Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: an empirical study”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16.1. 23-49.
  • Lou, J. 2007. “Revitalizing Chinatown into a heterotopia: a geosemiotic analysis of shop signs in Washington, D.C.'s Chinatown”. Space and Culture 10.2. 170-194.
  • Malinowski, D. 2009. “Authorship in the linguistic landscape: a multimodal-performative view”. In: Shohamy, E. and D. Gorter (Eds.). Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery. London/New York: Routledge. 107-125.
  • Pavlenko, A. 2009. “Language conflict in Post-Soviet linguistic landscapes”. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 17.1-2. 247-274.
  • Scollon, R. and S.W. Scollon. 2003. Discourses in place: language in the material world. London/New York: Routledge.
  • Shohamy, E. and S. Waksman. 2009. “Linguistic landscape as an ecological arena: modalities, meanings, negotiations, education”. In: Shohamy, E. and D. Gorter (Eds.). Linguistic landscape: expanding the scenery. London/New York: Routledge. 313-331.
  • Spolsky, B. and R.L. Cooper. 1991. The languages of Jerusalem. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spolsky, B. 2009. “Progelomena to a sociolinguistic theory of public signage”. In: Shohamy, E. and D. Gorter (Eds.). Linguistic landcape: expanding the scenery. London/New York: Routledge. 25-39.
  • Torkington, K. 2008. “Exploring the linguistic landscape: the case of the 'Golden Triangle' in the Algarve, Portugal”. Paper presented at the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching. Retrieved December 20, 2009 from http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/pgconference/v03.htm

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_snp_2015_15_03
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.