Co-generation and maintenance of ‘dialogic space’ by means of verbal-gestural involvement, with some pedagogical implications

• Authors: Joanna Puppel , Stanisław Puppel
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

We emphasize that ‘dialogic space’ is a precondition to the presence and maintenance of collective culture whose most conspicuous dimension is dialogic culture. We assume that dialogic culture constitutes the fullest dimension of humanity, and we highlight its role in a number of assumptions (1-8). Next, dialogic culture in terms of its properties is briefly discussed. We further assume that dialogic space in its verbal-non-verbal tanglements is of central significance in foreign language pedagogy and as such it should be present in foreign teaching/learning programs in order to help promote the positively-charged dialogue-oriented society of practice and at the same time exclude the proliferation of negatively-charged communications.

Keywords

PL

human condition; collective culture; dialogic culture; dialogic space; gestural involvement; intersubjectivity; Buber-Bakhtin Dialogic System (BBDS); hard boundaries; soft boundaries; dialogic pedagogy; maximally malignant monstrous language virus

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 18
• Pages: 221-230

Dates

published

2019-02-07

Contributors

author

Joanna Puppel

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

author

Stanisław Puppel

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

References

• Arendt, H. 1958/2013. The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Bakhtin, M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
• Bauman, R. and J. Sherzer. (eds.). 1989. Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bolt, R.A. 1987. „The integrated multi-modal interface”. Transactions of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (Japan), J79-D(11). 2017-2025.
• Breen, M.P. 1985. „The social context for language learning – a neglected situation?”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7.2. 135-158.
• Brignall, T.W. and T. Van Valey. 2005. „The impact of internet communications on social interaction”. Sociological Spectrum 25.3. 335-348.
• Buber, M. 1958. I and thou. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark.
• Burnet, J. 1920/1950. Greek philosophy: from Thales to Plato. London: Macmillan.
• Carnap, R. 1995. An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Dover Publications.
• Cary, L.J. 2006. Curriculum spaces: discourse, postmodern theory and educational research. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
• de Certeau, M. 1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Flecha, R. 2000. Sharing words: theory and practice of dialogic learning. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Gentilucci, M. and M.C. Corbalis. 2006. „From manual gesture to speech: a graduał transition”. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 30. 949-960.
• Holquist, M. 2002. Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge.
• Jesson, R. 2016. „Creating dialogic spaces: talk as a mediational tool in becoming a writer”. International Journal of Education Research 80. 155-163.
• Matusov, E. 2009. Journey into dialogic pedagogy. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
• Mehrabian, A. 1972. Silent messages: implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. Le visible et L’invisible. Paris: Gallimard.
• Plaza, S.R. 2010. „Egalitarian dialogue and instrumental dimension. Two principles of dialogic learning in the classroom”. Psychology, Society and Education 2.1. 61-70.
• Puppel, J. 2015. „Siła performatywna komunikacji niewerbalnej używana przez nauczyciela i ucznia w formalnych warunkach klasy”. In Puppel, S. (ed.). MOTEK. Motywy ekolingwistyczne: w stronę ekoglottodydaktyki. Poznań: Zakład Graficzny UAM. 133-141.
• Puppel, S. 2004. „An outline of a domain-resource-agent-access-management (DRAAM) model of human communication: towards an ecology of human communication”. Working Papers of the Department of Ecocommunication Oikeios Logos Nr 1. 1-26.
• Puppel, S. 2018. „On the workings of the ‘language kite’: towards a holistic account of the human linguistic- communicative endeavour (de laboribus milvi linguae)”. In: Bielak, M., S. Puppel and W. Maliszewski. (eds). Linguolabourese: language and communication in action. Advances in elinguistics. 57-66.
• Puppel, S. and J. Puppel. 2010. “Some notes on the role of the hand-arm system (HAS) in the ecology of human communication”. Working Papers of the Department of Ecocommunication Oikeios Logos Nr 6. 1-9.
• Sapir, E. 1921. Language: an introduction to the study of speech. New York; Harcourt, Brace.
• Shannon, C.E. 1948. „A mathematical theory of communication”. Bell System Technical Journal 27. 379-423, 623-656.
• Sedley, D. 2003. The Cambridge companion to Greek and Roman philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
• Tedlock, D. and B. Mannheim. (eds.) 1995. The dialogic emergence of culture. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
• Tenbrink, T. 2007. Space, time, and the use of language: an investigation of relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Tharp. R.G. and R. Gallimore. 1988. Rousing minds to life: teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tharp, R.G., P. Estrada, S.S. Dalton and L.A. Yamauchi. 2000. Teaching transformed: achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion, and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Tiberius, R.G. and J.M. Billson. 1991. „The social context of teaching and learning”. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 45. 67-86.
• Todorov, T. 1984. Mikhail Bakhtin: the dialogical principle. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Wegerif, R. 2011. „Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think”. Thinking Skills and Creativity 6. 179-190.
• Wenden, A.L. 1983. „The process of interaction”. Language Learning 33. 103-121.
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/snp.2018.18.19