Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 18 | 267-275

Article title

Developing communicative competence in L2 tertiary level students: remarks on culturally responsive teaching

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Semiotic links exist among communication, culture, teaching, and learning and this has important implications for implementing culturally responsive teaching. The present paper provides some arguments in favour of creating culturally sensitive classrooms where students have an opportunity to acquire a broader cultural awareness which helps them to develop their intercultural communicative competence.

Year

Issue

18

Pages

267-275

Physical description

Dates

published
2019-02-07

Contributors

author
author
  • Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Warszawie

References

  • Bruner, I. 1996. The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hall, E. 1956. The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  • Hofstede, G.H. 1986. “Cultural differences in teaching and learning.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10. 301-319.
  • Hofstede, G.H. 1980. Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related value. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Kramsch, C. 1993. Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pillay, V. 2006. “Culture. exploring the river”. In LeBaron, M. and V. Pillay (eds.). Conflict across cultures: a unique experience of bridging differences. Boston: Intercultural Press. 25-56.
  • Porter, R.E. and L.A. Samovar. 1991. “Basic principles of intercultural communication”. In: Samovar, L.A.
  • nd R.E. Porter. (eds.). Intercultural communication: a reader (6th edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 5-22.
  • Widdowson, H. 2004. „The ownership of English.” TESOL Quarterly 2. 377-389.
  • Samovar, L.A. and R.E. Porter. 2004. Communication between cultures (4th edition). Boston: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
  • Vassileva, I. 2000. Who is the author? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian academic discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_snp_2018_18_23
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.