2020 | 20 |
Article title

Twarz miasta: próba zdefiniowania

Title variants
Languages of publication
Cities belong to the main habitats of human beings. Urban space is a peculiar type of space due to cultural, social, ethnic and linguistic diversity of its inhabitants. This diversity creates a unique image and identity of each urban settlement. The present paper defines the uniqueness of the city as its parameter, its ‘face’. Similarly to the biological face, the face of the city is inimitable. In order to define the ‘face of the city’, a survey was conducted in which the main parts of the human face (eyes, ears, nose, mouth) were compared to the features of the urban space. The survey also focused on expression, biological processes (youth, old age), applied treatments, such as ornamentation, as well as on general changes in image.
Physical description
  • Berrios, G.E. 2003. „The face in medicine and psychology: a conceptual history”. W zbiorze: Katsikitis, M. (red.). The human face: measurement and meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 49–62.
  • Brown, P. i S.C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ekman, P. i R.J. Davidson. (red.). 1999. Natura emocji. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Ekman, P. 1999. „Basic emotions”. W zbiorze: Dalgleish, T. i M. Power. (red.). Handbook of cognition and emotion. New York: Wiley and Sons. 45–60.
  • Goffman, E. 1955. „On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements of social interaction”. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18.3. 213–231.
  • Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Goren, C.C., Sarty, M. i P.Y. Wu. 1975. „Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants”. Pediatrics 56.4. 544–549.
  • Haugh, M. i C. Hinze. 2003. „A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese”. Journal of Pragmatics 35.10/11. 1581–1611.
  • Henneberg, M., Simpson, E. i C. Stephan. 2003. „Human face in biological anthropology: craniometry, evolution and forensic identification”. W zbiorze: Katsikitis, M. (red.). The human face: measurement and meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 29–48.
  • Ho, D.Y. 1976. „On the concept of face”. American Journal of Sociology 81.4. 867–884.
  • Jack, R.E. i P.G. Schyns. 2015. „The human face as a dynamic tool for social communication”. Current Biology 25. 621–634.
  • Kim, Y.J. et al. 2013. „The functionality of facial appearance and its importance to a Korean population”.
  • Archives of Plastic Surgery Arch Plast Surg 40. 715–720.
  • Puppel, J. 2011. „Uwagi w sprawie zarządzania twarzą w przestrzeni publicznej”. W zbiorze: Puppel, S. (red.). Transkomunikacja. Poznań: Katedra Ekokomunikacji UAM. 81–89.
  • Puppel, J. 2016. „Wskaźnikowość twarzy ludzkiej: krótki przegląd problematyki”. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia XVI. 201–206.
  • Puppel, S. 2016. „Kuźnia Hefajstosa czyli krótki zarys teorii wizerunku w komunikacji człowieka”. Scripta Neophilologica Posnaniensia XVI. 107–124.
  • Scruton, R. 1979. The aesthetics of architecture. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Tymkiewicz, J. 2012. Funkcje ścian zewnętrznych w aspektach badań jakościowych. Wpływ rozwiązań architektonicznych elewacji na kształtowanie jakości budynku. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
  • Żurek, A. 2008. „Teorie grzeczności językowej”. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Kształcenie Językowe 7.17. 3143. 33–43.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.