Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 1 (21) | 101-120

Article title

Istotny pogląd Prezesa UOKiK jako element postępowania sądowego

Content

Title variants

EN
Observations of the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection in national court proceedings

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This article concerns the legal institution of observations submitted in civil proceedings by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (hereinafter: President of the UOKiK). This institution is analysed within the framework of the hitherto practice of the Polish courts and the President of the UOKiK. Significant legal issues linked with the submission of the said observations and the way they are processed by the courts are presented, and premises for submitting these observations by the President of the UOKiK described. It is pointed out that submitting an observation is contingent upon the existence of public interest as well as occurrence of a significant question which is relevant to the case. Such a question needs to deal with the widely understood protection of competition and consumers. It is also noted that observations may only be submitted with regard to an actual case heard by the court. It may be addressed to either general, administrative or arbitration courts as well as to the Supreme Court. The article contains a description of the procedure of submitting observations, taking into account the settled practice of the President of the UOKiK. Within that scope issues concerning an application for submitting observations and formal requirements that such observations need to satisfy are also discussed. Furthermore, an attempt is made to determine the legal character of the said institution, taking into account the views presented in caselaw and literature. In that context a possibility of qualifying these observations as evidence has been excluded. Finally, the principles that need to be adopted by the courts when they examine the observations are discussed and the fact that courts have no competence to verify the observations submitted by the President of the UOKiK in respect of formal requirements and conditions for submission is stressed.

Year

Issue

Pages

101-120

Physical description

Dates

published
2018

Contributors

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
927524

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_spp_2018_1_21_5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.