PL EN


2020 | 1(29) | 181-196
Article title

Zakres przedmiotowy tzw. uchwały krajobrazowej. Uwagi na tle wyroku Wojewódzkiego Sądu Administracyjnego w Gdańsku z 18 września 2018 r., sygn. II SA/Gd 328/18

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
THE MATERIAL SCOPE OF THE “LANDSCAPE RESOLUTION”. COMMENTS ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN GDAŃSK OF 18 SEPTEMBER 2018, REF. II SA/GD 328/18
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The text concerns an analysis of theses and justification for the judgment of Province Administrative Court in Gdańsk dated 18 September 2018 (case no. II SA/Gd 328/18). Although the judgment is based on particular factual state of affairs, its conclusions seem to be connected with common problems in the area of so-called ‘landscape acts’ adopted at the municipal level. Firstly, the judgment states that landscape acts may refer to campaign materials presented in connection with elections or referendum. In the commentary, this approach is approved, although the reasoning is developed via a detailed interpretationof the spatial management and planning act and electoral code. Later in the judgment it is claimed that landscape acts may cover rules of locating advertisements nearby elements of the road infrastructure. Moreover, this standpoint is shared in the gloss, detailed relations between landscape act and act on public roads as well as judgments in similar cases have been additionally presented. The last issue raised in the judgment was the problem of the legal grounds of imposing an obligation to maintain small architecture objects, advertisement boards /units and fences in the proper condition. As the court claimed, this is possible, because maintenance of the object is the element of its location, and this is also connected with the obligation to use high-quality materials. Moreover, it is stated that the problem of maintaining these objects has not been fully regulated in building law. This approach is accepted in the gloss, although attention is drawn to some inconsistencies in the justification, as well as to the possibility of raising other, moreaccurate arguments by the court.
Year
Issue
Pages
181-196
Physical description
Dates
published
2020-03-15
Contributors
author
References
  • Banaszak B., Kodeks wyborczy. Komentarz, Warszawa 2020.
  • Bąkowski T., Zakres swobody i władztwa planistycznego gminy w kształtowaniu treści uchwały krajobrazowej, „Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze” 2017, nr 2.
  • Fogel A., Goleń G., Staniewska A., Komentarz do art. 7 ustawy krajobrazowej, w: Ustawa krajobrazowa. Komentarz do przepisów wprowadzonych w związku ze wzmocnieniem narzędzi ochrony krajobrazu, pod red. A. Fogel, Warszawa 2016.
  • Murzydło J., Prawo budowlane a budynki oszpecające otoczenie, „Państwo i Prawo” 2007, z. 4.
  • Plucińska-Filipowicz B., Kosicki A., Komentarz do art. 37c ustawy o planowaniu i zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym, w: Ustawa o planowaniu i zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym. Komentarz aktualizowany, pod red. A. Plucińskiej-Filipowicz, M. Wierzbowskiego, Warszawa 2019.
  • Słownik współczesnego języka polskiego, t. 2, pod red. B. Dunaja, Warszawa 1998.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_spp_2020_1_29_8
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.