Kilka uwag na temat zasad działania Komisji Odwoławczej Agencji ds. Współpracy Organów Regulacji Energetyki

• Authors: Mariusz Swora

Title variants

EN

Some remarks on the functioning of the Board of Appeal of the EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators

Abstracts

EN

The Board of Appeal (BoA) of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) belongs to the category of appeal bodies hearing appeals against the deci-sions of EU administrative agencies. ACER BoA acts on the basis of legal framework dedicated to the Agency, while the rules of conduct before the Board are regulated by internal rules of procedure. These regulations are practically the only legal acts regulating the procedure before the BoA, as the EU has not adopted a single ad-ministrative code that would regulate the procedure before such bodies, inter alia. The BoA is a specialised body responsible for adjudicating complex cases in the field of the EU common energy market related to the implementation of European network codes. The CJEU (General Court) sought to dispel any doubts concerning the rules of adjudication of the BoA in the ACER v. Aquind judgment by expressing a number of views on the scope and standard of adjudication, but even in the light of this judgment, a number of matters remain unclear. Consequently, it is all the more urgent to adopt a clear procedural and systemic framework governing the functioning of the BoA.

Keywords

EN

Board of Appeal; administrative procedure; energy law; ACER

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studia Prawa Publicznego
• Year: 2022
• Issue: 2 (38)
• Pages: 131-143

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Mariusz Swora

• https://orcid.org/0000000331196192

References

• Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies: Towards Judicialization of Administrative Review?, pod red. M. Chamon, A. Volpato, M. Eliantonio, Oxford University Press 2022.
• Johnston A., Bjørnebye H., EU Energy Law and Fundamental Rights, MarIus 2021, no. 551.
• Kijowski D.R., Idea i założenia modelu kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego Unii Europejskiej Grupy ReNEUAL a perspektywy zmian w polskich procedurach administracyjnych, w: Kodeks postępowania administracji Unii Europejskiej, pod red. J. Supernata, B. Kowalczyk, Warszawa 2017.
• Kmieciak Z., Samorządowe kolegia odwoławcze a formuła instancyjności postępowania administracyjnego (na tle prawnoporównawczym), „Samorząd Terytorialny” 2015, nr 6.
• Krajewski M., Judicial and Extra-Judicial Review: The Quest for Epistemic Certainty, „iCourts Working Paper Series” 2020, no. 226.
• Skoczylas A., Swora M., Administrative Judiciary in Poland in Search for Fairness and Efficiency – an Overview, „Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences” 2007, no. 19 E.
• Stefan O.A., Petri M., Too Weak to Be Controlled: Judicial Review of ACER Soft Law, „Yearbook of European Law” 2018, vol. 37, https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yey009.
• Swora M., Aktualne tendencje w zakresie tworzenia agencji w Unii Europejskiej – administracja europejska in statu nascendi, Warszawa 2006.
• Swora M., Niezależne organy administracji, Warszawa 2012.
• Tovo C., The Boards of Appeal of Networked Services: Specialized Arbitrators of Transnational Regulatory Conflicts?, w: Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies: Towards Judicialization of Administrative Review?, pod red. M. Chamon, A. Volpato, M. Eliantonio, Oxford University Press 2022.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/spp.2022.2.38.6

Biblioteka Nauki

2142900