Kelsen in the reactor hall? The complex interrelationship of national law, European Union law and international law in the regulation of nuclear safety

• Authors: Kim Fyhr

Abstracts

EN

This paper focuses on a highly specialized field of law, namely nuclear law. This is characterized, on the one hand, by strong national competences and the primary position of national law, but also, on the other hand, by the international dimension, which has a major impact on national law. For a European Union Member State, the picture is even more wide-ranging, as European Union law, in this case the Euratom Treaty, adds another important layer to the legal-regulatory framework in the nuclear energy sector. The point of departure for this paper is therefore that of an EU Member State, which in nuclear energy issues functions in a legal field consisting of three interdependent main elements – national law, European Union law and international law. Thus, the article seeks to answer the question of which of these three legal systems is the primary one for an EU Member State in the area of nuclear safety, and also to shed light on their interrelationships. he theoretical framework for this analysis aimed at systematization is Hans Kelsen’s classical theory of legal systems. The argument presented here is that for an EU Member State the primary legal system from a legal-hierarchical point of view is the legal system composed of EU law. This is the case mainly because the EU has competence in the area of nuclear safety, albeit shared with the EU Member States. Although the EU/Euratom has not yet significantly expanded regulation in this field, this will most likely change as EU energy policy and legislation develops further in the future. This evolution will most likely have both legislative and enforcement impacts, despite the fact that the substantive content of legislation on all three levels is quite similar. In spite of this, the three legal systems co-exist in constant interaction and without major collisions. Kelsen’s perspective can prove beneficial for understanding the boundaries of the three interdependent legal systems and the shift of the basic norm towards EU law over the past two decades.

Keywords

EN

nuclear law; nuclear safety; legal system; legal theory

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studia Prawa Publicznego
• Year: 2023
• Issue: 3 (43)
• Pages: 57-88

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Kim Fyhr

• University of Helsinki

• https://orcid.org/0000000293405474

References

• Allen D., The Euratom Treaty, Chapter VI: New Hope or False Dawn?, “Common Market Law Review” 1983, no. 20(3), pp. 473–494.
• Bergé J.-S., Legal Application, Global Legal Pluralism and Hierarchies of Norms, “European Journal of Legal Studies” 2011, no. 4(2), pp. 241–263.
• Bethlehem D., International Law, European Community Law, National Law: Three systems in Search of a Framework. Systemic Relativity in the Interaction of Law in the European Union, in: International Law Aspects of the European Union, M. Koskenniemi (ed.), Hague – London – Boston 1998, pp. 169–196.
• Blohm-Hieber U., The Radioactive Waste Directive: a necessary step in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste in the European Union, “Nuclear Law Bulletin” 2012, no. 2011(2), pp. 21–35.
• Burns S., Milestones in Nuclear Law: A Journey in Nuclear Regulation, in: International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Law. The Global Debate, Vienna 2022, pp. 55–73.
• Burns S., The Impact of the Major Nuclear Power Plant Accidents on the International Legal Framework for Nuclear Power, “Nuclear Law Bulletin” 2018, no. 101(2), pp. 7–30.
• Cenevska I., The European Parliament and the European Atomic Energy Community. A Legitimacy Crisis?, “European Law Review” 2010, no. 35(3), pp. 415–424.
• Cusack T.F., A Tale of the Two Treaties: An Assessment of the Euratom Treaty in relation to the EC Treaty, “Common Market Law Review” 2003, no. 40(1), pp. 117–141.
• Engstedt R., Euratom – the Treaty and the Competences of the Community, University of Eastern Finland 2020.
• Garribba M., Chirtes A., Nauduzaite M., The Directive establishing a Community Framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations. The EU approach to nuclear safety, “Nuclear Law Bulletin” 2010, no. 2009(2), pp. 23–33.
• Handrlica J., Nuclear Law revisited as an academic Discipline, “The Journal of World Energy Law & Business” 2019, no. 12(1), pp. 52–68.
• Handrlica J., The splendid durability of the provisional: A Tribute to Euratom, “Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy” 2018, no. 14(1), pp. 161–180.
• International Energy Agency, Nuclear Power and Secure Energy Transition. From Today’s Challenges to Tomorrow’s clean Energy Systems, Vienna 2022.
• Kamminga M.T., The IAEA Convention on Nuclear Safety, “International & Comparative Law Quarterly” 1995, no. 44(4), pp. 872–882.
• Kelsen H., Die Einheit von Völkerrecht und staatlichem Recht, “Festgabe für Alexander N. Makarov. Abhandlungen zum Völkerrecht. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht” 1958, no. 19(1–3), pp. 234–248.
• Kelsen H., General Theory of Law and State, Clark, NJ 2007. Kelsen H., Reine Rechtslehre, Tübingen 2008.
• Kelsen H., Unrecht und Unrechtsfolge im Völkerrecht, “Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht” 1932, no. 12, pp. 481–608.
• Kelsen H., Zur Lehre vom Primat des Völkerrechts, “Internationale Zeitschrift für Theorie des Rechts” 1938, no. 12, pp. 211–216.
• Komárek J., The Place of Constitutional Courts in the EU, “European Constitutional Law Review” 2013, no. 9(3), pp. 420–450.
• Maduro M.P., Europe and the Constitution: What if this is as good as it gets, in: European Constitutionalism beyond the State, J.H.H. Weiler, M. Wind (eds.), Cambridge 2003, pp. 74–102.
• Mallard G., Crafting the Nuclear Regime Complex (1950–1975): Dynamics of Harmonization of opaque Treaty Rules, “European Journal of International Law” 2014, no. 25(2), pp. 445–472.
• Mathijsen P., Some Legal Aspects of Euratom, “Common Market Law Review” 1966, no. 3(3), pp. 326–343.
• Nocera F., The legal regime of nuclear Energy. A comprehensive guide to international and European Union Law, Antwerpen – Oxford 2005.
• Pouleur Y., Krs P., The Momentum of the European Directive on Nuclear safety – from the complexity of nuclear safety to key messages addressed to European citizens, “Nuclear Law Bulletin” 2010, no. 2010, pp. 5–33.
• Richmond C., Preserving the identity Crisis: Autonomy, System and Sovereignty in European Law in: Constructing Legal Systems. European Union in Legal Theory, N. Mac Cormick (ed.), Dordrecht 1997, pp. 47–90.
• Schärf W.-G., The Temelín-Judgement of the European Court of Justice, “Nuclear Law Bulletin” 2010, no. 85(1), pp. 79–91.
• Somek A., Kelsen Lives, “European Journal of International Law” 2007, no. 18(3), pp. 409–451.
• Sousa Ferro M., Competition Law and the Nuclear Sector. An EU Outlook, “Nuclear Law” 2010, no. 86(2), pp. 35–49.
• Södersten A., Euratom at the Crossroads, Cheltenham – Northampton, MA 2014. Stoiber C., The Review Conference Mechanism in nuclear law: issues and opportunities, “Nuclear Law Bulletin” 2009, no. 2009(1), pp. 5–27.
• Stoiber C., Baer A., Pelzer N., Tonhauser W., Handbook on Nuclear Law, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna 2003.
• Wetherall A., Normative Rule Making at the IAEA: Codes of Conduct, “Nuclear Law Bulletin” 2005, no. 1, pp. 71–93.
• Weiler J.H.H., In Defence of the Status Quo: Europe’s constitutional Sonderweg, in: European Constitutionalism beyond the State, J.H.H. Weiler, M. Wind (eds.), Cambridge 2003, pp. 7–24.
• Wolf S., Euratom, the European Court of Justice, and the Limits of Nuclear Integration in Europe, “German Law Journal” 2011, no. 12(8), pp. 1637–1658.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/spp.2023.3.43.3

Biblioteka Nauki

28409359