Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2019 | 9 | 4 | 657-680

Article title

Factors influencing language teacher cognition: An ecological systems study

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Learning about language teacher cognition (LTC) is useful for understanding how language teachers act in the classroom. Employing an ecological framework, this study aimed to explore the factors influencing language teachers’ LTCs at different levels. To this end, qualitative data using semi-structured interviews and observation were collected from 62 (30 males and 32 females) Iranian EFL teachers. The results indicated that, at microsystem level, factors such as teaching equipment and facilities, teachers’ mood and feelings, their job satisfaction, and language proficiency influenced LTC. At mesosystem level, LTC was influenced by teachers’ prior learning experience, the collaboration and collegiality among teachers working in the language institute, teachers’ self-efficacy, and critical incidents that happened when teaching or learning. Additionally, the results indicated that exosystem level factors including teacher appraisal criteria, the teaching program and curriculum, and teacher immunity affected LTC. Moreover, LTC was subject to the influence of the government’s attitudes about ELT and religious beliefs about self and interaction, and friendliness with students at macrosystem level. More importantly, it was found that the factors influencing LTC were interrelated and interconnected and in several cases, LTC was a product of joint effect of several factors at various ecosystem levels. Finally, findings in this study suggest that language teaching programs provide recent educational technology in the classroom, foster collaboration and collegiality among teachers, and clarify teacher appraisal criteria for teachers in order to help create positive language teaching beliefs.

Year

Volume

9

Issue

4

Pages

657-680

Physical description

Dates

published
2019-12-31

References

  • Berg, S., Benz, C. R., Lasley, T., & Raisch, D. (1998). Exemplary technology use in elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 111-122. http://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1998.10782245
  • Bernat, E. (2008). Beyond beliefs: Psycho-cognitive, sociocultural and emergent ecological approaches to learner perceptions in foreign language acquisition. Asian EFL Journal, 10(3), 7-27.
  • Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
  • Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Borg, S. (2018). Evaluating the impact of professional development. RELC Journal, 49(2), 195-216. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218784371
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Burns, A., Freeman, D., & Edwards, E. (2015). Theorizing and studying the language-teaching mind: Mapping research on language teacher cognition. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 585-601. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12245
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1996). Analytic ordering for theoretical purposes. Qualitative Inquiry, 2 (2), 139-150. http://doi.org/10.1177/107780049600200201
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE.
  • Crooks, G. (2015). Redrawing the boundaries on theory, research, and practice concerning language teachers’ philosophies and language teacher cognition: Toward a critical perspective. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 485-499. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12237
  • Cummins, J., & Early, M. (2015). Big ideas for expanding minds: Teaching English language learners across the curriculum. Ontario: Pearson Canada
  • Cummings, A. (2008). Spanish teachers' beliefs and practices on computers in the classroom. Hispania, 1, 73-92.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Farrell, T. S. (2015). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Farrell, T. S. (2016). The practices of encouraging TESOL teachers to engage in reflective practice: An appraisal of recent research contributions. Language Teaching Research, 20(2), 223-247. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815617335
  • Farrell, T. S., & Kun, S. T. K. (2007). Language policy, language teachers' beliefs, and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 381-403. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm050
  • Farrell, T. S., & Lim, P. C. P. (2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: A case study of teachers' beliefs and classroom practices. TESL-EJ 9(2), 1-13.
  • Feryok, A. (2010). Language teacher cognitions: Complex dynamic systems? System, 38(2), 272-279. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.02.001
  • Feryok, A., & Oranje, J. (2015). Adopting a cultural portfolio project in teaching German as a foreign language: Language teacher cognition as a dynamic system. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 546-564. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12243
  • Freeman, D. (2016). Educating second language teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ghafar Samar, R., & Moradkhani, S. (2014). Codeswitching in the language classroom: A study of four EFL teachers’ cognition. RELC Journal, 45(2), 151-164. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214534796
  • Hiver, P. (2017). Tracing the signature dynamics of language teacher immunity: A retrodictive qualitative modelling study. Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 669-690. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12433
  • Hornberger, N. (Ed.). (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. http://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596568
  • Johnson, K. E. (1996). The vision versus the reality: The tensions of the TESOL practicum. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 30-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Karimi, M. N., & Norouzi, M. (in press). Cognitive aging in teachers: L2 teachers’ cognitive performance across various stages in their teaching career. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. http://doi.org/10.1080/17 501229.2018.1466893
  • Kramsch, C. (2002). Language and culture: A social semiotic perspective. ADFL Bulletin, 33(2), 8-15. http://doi.org/10.1632/adfl.33.2.8
  • Kramsch, C. (2008). Ecological perspectives on foreign language education. Language Teaching, 41(3), 389-408. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005065
  • Kramsch, C., & Steffensen, S. (2007). Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. In N. Hornberger & P. Duff (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of language and education (Vol. 8, pp. 17-28). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
  • Kubanyiova, M. (2015). The role of teachers’ future self-guides in creating L2 development opportunities in teacher-led classroom discourse: Reclaiming the relevance of language teacher cognition. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 565-584. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12244
  • Kubanyiova, M., & Feryok, A. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 435-449. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12239
  • Leather, J., & van Dam, J. (2003). Towards an ecology of language acquisition. In J. Leather & J. Van Dam (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 1-30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-0 17-0341-3
  • Moodie, I. (2015). Grounded narrative inquiry into language teacher cognition: Stories and case studies on English language teaching in South Korea. Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago.
  • Moodie, I. (2016). The anti-apprenticeship of observation: How negative prior language learning experience influences English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. System, 60, 29-41. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.011
  • Moodie, I., & Feryok, A. (2015). Beyond cognition to commitment: English language teaching in South Korean primary schools. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 450-469. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12238
  • Muhlhausler, P. (1996). Linguistic ecology: Language change and linguistic imperialism in the Pacific Region. London: Routledge.
  • Ng, E. K. J., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2003). Do teachers’ beliefs of grammar teaching match their classroom practices? A Singapore case study. English in Singapore: Research on Grammar, 2, 128-137.
  • Nunan, D. (2001). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rahmani Doqaruni, V. (2017). Communication strategies in experienced vs. inexperienced teachers’ talk: A sign of transformation in teacher cognition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 17-31. http://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1009071
  • Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196-213. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00111
  • Richards, J. C., & Farrell, S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237
  • Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2016). The idea of English in Iran: An example from Urmia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(4), 419-434. http://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1080714
  • Sharifian, F. (2010). Cultural conceptualisations in intercultural communication: A study of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3367-3376. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.006
  • Soodmand Afshar, H., & Doosti, M. (2016). An investigation into factors contributing to Iranian secondary school English teachers’ job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Research Papers in Education, 31 (3), 274-298. http://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1037335
  • Tedick, D. J. (2009). K-12 language teacher preparation: Problems and possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 263-267. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.15404781.2009.00860_2.x
  • Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
  • Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wright, T. (2010). Second language teacher education: Review of recent research onpractice. Language Teaching, 43(3), 259-296. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000030
  • Yaghoubinejad, H., Zarrinabadi, N., & Nejadansari, D. (2017). Culture-specificity of teacher demotivation: Iranian junior high school teachers caught in the newly-introduced CLT trap! Teachers and Teaching, 23(2), 127-140.
  • Yunus, M. M., Salehi, H., & Amini, M. (2016). EFL teachers’ cognition of teaching Englishpronunciation techniques: A mixed-method approach. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 20. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p20
  • Zarrinabadi, N., & Mahmoudi-Gahrouei, V. (2018). English in contemporary Iran. Asian Englishes, 20(1), 81-94. http://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2017.1389147

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_ssllt_2019_9_4_5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.