The dynamism of strategic learning: Complexity theory in strategic L2 development

• Authors: Carmen M. Amerstorfer
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Learners of foreign languages (L2s) apply strategies to support learning processes and L2 development. They select strategies according to their individual needs and preferences and adjust their strategic actions to suit situational circumstances and contextual conditions. A holistic investigation of strategic L2 learning processes requires the integration of numerous interconnected, flexibly-interacting influences, which are at constant interplay with each other and whose development is difficult to predict. Validated as effective in other fields of applied linguistics, complex dynamic systems theory (CDST) can also provide an appropriate frame for researching strategic L2 learning. Based on state-of-the-art methodological guidance for complexity research, this article presents the re-analysis of empirical data from a previous study through a complexity lens. It further examines the suitability of CDST in strategy research, explores its practical value, and demonstrates that a complexity perspective can generate new, profound information about strategic learning.

Keywords

EN

CDST; complex dynamic systems; complexity theory; dynamism; language learning strategies; strategic language learning

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 21-44

Dates

published

2020-03-29

Contributors

author

Carmen M. Amerstorfer

• University of Klagenfurt, Austria

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1746-2258

References

• Amerstorfer, C. M. (2016). Situated strategy use in cooperative learning: A descriptive case study of five learners of English as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Klagenfurt, Austria.
• Amerstorfer, C. M. (2018a). Mixing methods: Investigating self-regulated strategies in a cooperative EFL learning environment. In R. L. Oxford & C. M. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situated strategy use in diverse contexts (pp. 123-140). London: Bloomsbury.
• Amerstorfer, C. M. (2018b). Past its expiry date? The SILL in modern mixed-methods strategy research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 497-523.
• Amerstorfer, C. M. (in press). Learners’ inner peace and interpersonal peace in innovative L2 teaching. In R. L. Oxford, M. Olivero, & T. Gregersen (Eds.), Peacebuilding in language education: Innovations in theory and practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
• Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. (Eds.). (2015). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through time and space: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619-647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Longman.
• Cohen, A. D. (2018). Moving from theory to practice: A closer look at language learner strategies. In R. L. Oxford & C. M. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situated strategy use in diverse contexts (pp. 31-53). London: Bloomsbury.
• Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. (2006). Language Strategy Use Inventory. In R. M. Paige, A. D. Cohen, B. Kappler, J. Chi, & J. Lassegard (Eds.), Maximizing study abroad: A students’ guide to strategies for language and culture learning and use (2nd ed.; pp. 21-27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.
• Cohen, A. D., & Wang, I. K. H. (2018). Fluctuation in the functions of language learner strategies. System, 74, 169-182. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.011
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. London: Routledge.
• de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21.
• Dewaele, J. M. (2011). Reflections on the emotional and psychological aspects of foreign language learning and use. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 22(1), 23-42. Retrieved from https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/5096/1/Dewaele2011Anglistik.pdf
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59, 230-248.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: “Retrodictive qualitative modelling” in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80-91.
• Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (2015a). Introduction: Applying complex dynamic systems principles to empirical research on L2 motivation. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 1-7). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (Eds.). (2015b). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.
• Gkonou, C. (2018). Listening to highly anxious EFL learners through the use of narrative: Metacognitive and affective strategies for learner self-regulation. In R. L. Oxford & C. M. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situated strategy use in diverse contexts (pp. 79-97). London: Bloomsbury.
• Griffiths, C. (Ed.). (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Griffiths, C. (2018a). How individual differences relate to successful strategy use: Self-regulated language learners around the world. In R. L. Oxford & C. M. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situated strategy use in diverse contexts (pp. 55-73). London: Bloomsbury.
• Griffiths, C. (2018b). The strategy factor in successful language learning: The tornado effect (2nd ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Gu, P. Y. (2012). Learning strategies: Prototypical core and dimensions of variation. Studies in Self-Access Learning, 3, 330-356.
• Gu, P. Y. (2018). Making language learning strategies research useful: Insights from China. In R. L. Oxford & C. M. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situated strategy use in diverse contexts (pp. 145-166). London: Bloomsbury.
• Gu, P. Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
• Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor states. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 20-28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 741-756.
• Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Hosenfeld, C. (1976). Learning about learning: Discovering our students’ strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 9(2), 117-129.
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015a). Saying what we mean: Making a case for “language acquisition” to become “language development.” Language Teaching, 48(4), 491-505.
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015b). Ten “lessons” from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11-19). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. H. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11-50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Second Language Annals, 51, 55-72.
• Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008a). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008b). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200-213.
• Lorette, P., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2015). Emotion recognition ability in English among L1 and LX users of English. International Journal of Language and Culture, 2(1), 62-86. http://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.2.1.03lor
• Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 90, 320-337. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.x
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Gregersen, T. (2019, March). Applications of two methods for studying language’s dynamic systems: Idiodynamics and experience sampling. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, GA, USA.
• Mercer, S. (2011). The self as a complex dynamic system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 57-82.
• Mercer, S. (2013). Towards a complexity-informed pedagogy for language learning. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13(2), 375-398.
• Mercer, S. (2016). The context within me: L2 self as a complex dynamic system. In J. King (Ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner (pp. 11-28). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Mizumoto, A., & Takeuchi, O. (2018). Modeling a prototypical use of language learning strategies: Decision tree-based methods in multiple contexts. In R. L. Oxford & C. M. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situated strategy use in diverse contexts (pp. 99-122). London: Bloomsbury.
• Mokharti, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2-10.
• Naiman, N., Fröhlich M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco A. (1978). The good language learner. Research in Education Series No. 7. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
• Oxford, R. L. (1999). Learning strategies. In B. Spolsky & R. E. Asher (Eds.), Concise encyclopedia of educational linguistics (pp. 518-522). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Education.
• Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
• Oxford, R. L., & Amerstorfer, C. M. (2018). Introduction: The state of the art in language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics. In R. L. Oxford & C. M. Amerstorfer (Eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situated strategy use in diverse contexts (pp. xxiii-xxxiv). London: Bloomsbury.
• Oxford, R. L., & Gkonou, C. (in press). Working with the complexity of language learners’ emotions and emotion regulation strategies. In R. J. Sampson & R. S. Pinter (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on researching language learner and language teacher psychology. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.
• Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-51.
• Rose, H. (2019, October). Evolving directions in language learning strategies: The interplay between self-regulation and learner strategies in teaching and research. Keynote speech at the SSU3 conference, Osaka, Japan.
• Sasaki, M., Mizumoto, A., & Murakami, A. (2018). Developmental trajectories in L2 writing strategy use: A self-regulation perspective. Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 292-309.
• Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 304-318.
• Thomas, N., & Rose, H. (2019). Do language learning strategies need to be self-directed? Disentangling strategies from self-regulated learning. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 248-257.
• Thomas, N., Rose, H., & Pojanapunya, P. (2019). Conceptual issues in strategy research: Examining the roles of teachers and students in formal education settings. Applied Linguistics Review. Advance online publication. http://doi. org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0033
• Ushioda, E. (2015). Contexts and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47-54). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431-462.
• van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. Harlow: Longman.
• Wang, I. K. H. (2018). Learning vocabulary strategically in a study abroad context. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Wenden, A. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 3-13). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• White, C., & Schramm, K., Chamot, A. U. (2007). Research methods in strategy research: Re-examining the toolbox. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 93-116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Williams, M., Mercer, S., & Ryan, S. (2015). Exploring psychology in language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.2