Expanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate

• Authors: Peter MacIntyre
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The dynamics underlying willingness to communicate in a second or third language (L2 for short), operating in real time, are affected by a number of intra- and inter-personal processes. L2 communication is a remarkably fluid process, especially considering the wide range of skill levels observed among L2 learners and speakers. Learners often find themselves in a position that requires the use of uncertain L2 skills, be it inside or outside the classroom context. Beyond issues of competencies, which are themselves complex, using an L2 also evokes cultural, political, social, identity, motivational, emotional, pedagogical, and other issues that learners must navigate on-the-fly. The focus of this article will be on the remarkably rapid integration of factors, such as the ones just named whenever a language learner chooses to be a language speaker, that is, when the moment for authentic communication arrives. Communicative events are especially important in understanding the psychology of the L2 learner. Our research group has developed the idiodynamic method to allow examination of an individual’s experience of events on a timescale of a few minutes. Results are describing complex interactions and rapid changes in the psychological conditions that accompany both approaching and avoiding L2 communication. The research takes a new approach to familiar concepts such as motivation, language competence, learning strategies, and so on. By examining willingness to communicate as a dynamic process, new types of research questions and answers are emerging, generating new theory, research methods, and pedagogical approaches applicable both within language classrooms and beyond.

Keywords

EN

communicative events; idiodynamic method; willingness to communicate; communication traits; dynamic turn

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 111-131

Dates

published

2020-03-29

Contributors

author

Peter MacIntyre

• Cape Breton University, Sydney, Canada

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1085-6692

References

• Ayers-Glassey, S., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2019). Measuring willingness to communicate in first and additional languages: An annotated bibliography (Unpublished manuscript). Cape Breton University.
• Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness-to-communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43, 60-69. http://doi.org/10.1080/03637757609375916
• Cao, Y. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 789-814.
• Chan, B., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The WTC scale as a predictor of classroom participation. Communication Research Reports, 4, 47-50.
• Charos, C. (1994). Personality and individual differences as predictors of second language communication: A causal analysis (Unpublished honors thesis). University of Ottawa, Canada.
• Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 190-209.
• de Bot, K. (2012). Time scales in second language development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 143-149.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53, 3-32.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. London: Erlbaum. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613349
• Epstein, S. (1991). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality. In R. C. Curtis (Ed.), The relational self: Theoretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology (p. 111-137). New York: Guilford Press.
• Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
• Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology. Volume 5: Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 159-184). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
• Epstein, S., & Erskine, N. (1983). The development of personal theories of reality. In D. Magnusson & V. Allen (Eds.), Human development: An interactional perspective (pp. 133-147). New York: Academic Press.
• Epstein, S., & Fenz, W. D. (1965). Steepness of approach and avoidance gradient in humans as a function of experience: Theory and experiment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1-12.
• Frankish, K. (2010). Dual‐process and dual‐system theories of reasoning. Philosophy Compass, 5, 914-926. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00330.x
• Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Meza, M. (2014). The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 98, 574-588.
• Kang, S. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33, 277-292. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004
• Kaufman, S. B. (2016). An ode to Seymour Epstein, originator of modern dual-process theory (1925-2016). Retrieved from https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/an-ode-to-seymour-epstein-originator-of-modern-dual-process-theory-1925-2016/
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. CA: Anchor Canada.
• Khatib, M., & Nourzadeh, S. (2015). Development and validation of an instructional willingness to communicate questionnaire. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36, 266-283. http://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2014.914523
• Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91, 564-576.
• MacIntyre, P. D. (2012). The idiodynamic method: A closer look at the dynamics of communication traits. Communication Research Reports, 29, 361-367.
• MacIntyre, P. D. (2018, October). Willingness to communicate: A dynamic approach. Plenary talk presented at the Second Language Research Forum.
• MacIntyre, P. D. (2019). Anxiety, uncertainty management and communication accommodation in women’s brief dyadic conversations with a stranger: An idiodynamic approach. Sage Open, 9(3), 1-18.
• MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., & Clément, R. (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents and consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47, 215-229. http://doi.org/10.1080/01463379909370135
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369-388. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003035
• MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52, 537-564.
• MacIntyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A. (2011). Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion students’ willingness to communicate. Modern Language Journal, 95, 81-96. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01141.x
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3-26. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001
• MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545-562. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
• MacIntyre. D., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (2007). Affective variables, attitude and personality in context. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), Handbook of French applied linguistics (pp. 270-298). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32, 149-171. http://doi.org/10.1093/ applin/amq037
• MacIntyre, P. D., & Serroul, A. (2015). Motivation on a per-second tTimescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Z. Dornyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp 109-138), Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• MacIntyre, P. D., Mercer, S., & Gregersen, T. (in press). Reflections on researching dynamics in language learning psychology. In R. Sampson & R. Pinner (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on researching language learner and teacher psychology. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
• MacIntyre, P. D., Noels K. A., & Moore, B. (2010). Perspectives on motivation in second language acquisition: Lessons from the Ryoanji Garden. In M. Prior (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 second language research forum (pp. 1-9). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
• McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO, USA.
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. In M. Booth-Butterfield (Ed.), Communication, cognition, and anxiety (pp. 19-37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). Designing a tool for measuring the interrelationships between L2 WTC and confidence, beliefs, motivation, and context. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Classroom-oriented research (pp. 19-37). Heidelberg: Springer.
• Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2017). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition: Combining a macro- and micro-perspective. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
• Peng, J. E. (2007). Willingness to communicate in an L2 and integrative motivation among college students in an intensive English language program in China. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 2, 33-59.
• Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
• Verspoor, M. (2015). Initial conditions. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp 38-46). Bristol, Multilingual Matters.
• Weaver, C. (2007). Willingness to communicate: A mediating factor in the interaction between learners and tasks. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 153-187). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
• Wood, D. (2016). Willingness to communicate and second language speech fluency: An idiodynamic investigation. System, 60, 11-28.
• Yashima, T., Zenuk‐Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54, 119-152.
• Zakahi, W. R., & McCroskey, J. C. (1989). Willingness to communicate: A potential confounding variable in communication research. Communication Reports, 2, 96-104.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6