Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2011 | 1 | 33-44

Article title

Kilka uwag na temat normatywności w teorii polityki: perspektywa utopii politycznej

Content

Title variants

EN
Kilka uwag na temat normatywności w teorii polityki: perspektywa utopii politycznej

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
In the opinion of the author, the current dimension of politicization depends on how efficient political activity is. It constitutes the realm of the increasingly professional activity intended to match the current, increasingly limited politicization. At the same time, the assessment of what we are presented with in an everyday agenda both restricts the discourse to the quantitative evaluation of politicians’ activities and limits the level of political participation of citizens. Our turbulent civilization forces us to plan more and more precisely, but at the same time it reduces the temporal perspective of political activity. The author attempts to answer the question of whether the state is becoming a ‘factory’ managed by the elites that are no longer politicized. In his opinion, the answer to this question should be: no, it isn’t.
EN
In the opinion of the author, the current dimension of politicization depends on how efficient political activity is. It constitutes the realm of the increasingly professional activity intended to match the current, increasingly limited politicization. At the same time, the assessment of what we are presented with in an everyday agenda both restricts the discourse to the quantitative evaluation of politicians’ activities and limits the level of political participation of citizens. Our turbulent civilization forces us to plan more and more precisely, but at the same time it reduces the temporal perspective of political activity. The author attempts to answer the question of whether the state is becoming a ‘factory’ managed by the elites that are no longer politicized. In his opinion, the answer to this question should be: no, it isn’t.

Keywords

Year

Issue

1

Pages

33-44

Physical description

Dates

published
2011-03-15

Contributors

  • Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski

References

  • Beyme K. von [2007], Współczesne teorie polityczne, z niem. tłum. J. Łoziński, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, Warszawa.
  • Olbromski C. J., Teoretyczne i praktyczne ograniczenia implementacji zasad demokratycznych modelu deliberatywnego w Europie Środkowej na przełomie XX i XXI w. – uwagi in statu nascendi, „Środkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne” 2009, nr 1–2, s. 37–50.
  • Schmitt C. [2000], Teologia polityczna i inne pisma, z niem. przeł. M. A. Cichocki, Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy ZNAK, Kraków.
  • Schopenhauer A.,O myśleniu z siebie samego, z niem. przeł. G. Sowiński, „Logos i Ethos” 1992, nr 2, s. 137–144.
  • Strauss L. [1998], Sokratejskie pytania, z ang. przeł. P. Maciejko, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa.
  • Weber M. [1985], Sens „wolnej od wartościowań” socjologii i ekonomii, z niem. tłum. E. Nowakowska-Sołtan, w: Problemy socjologii wiedzy, s. 101–148, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_ssp_2011_1_02
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.