Les éléments du récit personnel dans les échanges en ligne portant sur les sujets d’actualité : raconter pour mieux comprendre, reprendre pour entrer en dialogue

• Authors: Joanna Górecka

Title variants

EN

Personal narratives in online public forums: telling stories for better understanding, referring to others for better dialogue

• Languages of publication: FR

Abstracts

FR

The paper aims to present the potential, for foreign language students, of the exolingual interactions online in public and open forums. For the analysis of students’ commentaries, I apply the observation categories that were first elaborated for the analysis of posts published in press sites. I focus on narrative commentaries in which web users organize phenomena and events discussed in public discourse and try to give them their individual interpretation. I consider this kind of interaction on press sites as contributing to the civic debates: I argue that they can be also integrated in observation categories used to describe and analyze exchanges between students discussing social issues in reference to foreign language media information. In the paper I present two kinds of commentaries: those written by native speakers in public forums and those written by FL students in response to public commentaries.

EN

The paper aims to present the potential, for foreign language students, of the exolingual interactions online in public and open forums. For the analysis of students’ commentaries, I apply the observation categories that were first elaborated for the analysis of posts published in press sites. I focus on narrative commentaries in which web users organize phenomena and events discussed in public discourse and try to give them their individual interpretation. I consider this kind of interaction on press sites as contributing to the civic debates: I argue that they can be also integrated in observation categories used to describe and analyze exchanges between students discussing social issues in reference to foreign language media information. In the paper I present two kinds of commentaries: those written by native speakers in public forums and those written by FL students in response to public commentaries.

Keywords

FR

glottodidactics; written and asynchronous online communication; forum; online learning; narratives; medias; glottodidactics; written and asynchronous online communication; forum; online learning; narratives; medias

EN

glottodidactics; written and asynchronous online communication; forum; online learning; narratives; medias

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 46
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 45-62

Dates

published

2019-07-09

Contributors

author

Joanna Górecka

• Université Adam Mickiewicz, Poznań

References

• Amossy, R. (2011). La coexistence dans le dissensus. La polémique dans les forums de discussion. Semen, 31, 25-42. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/semen/9051.
• Audigier, F. (2017). Dans la vie et à l’école. Des récits pour connaitre, apprendre, comprendre le monde, agir, décider, choisir en situation. In A. Dias-Chiaruttini, & C. Coher-Azria (Eds.), Théories-didactiques de la lecture et de l’écriture. Fondement d’un champ de recherche en cheminant avec Yves Reuter (pp. 95-109). Villeneuve-d’Ascq : Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
• Bauer, B., deBenedette, L., Furstenberg, G. Levet, S., & Waryn, S. 2016. Internet-mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education: The Cultura Project. In J.A. Belz & S.L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education (pp. 31-62). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
• Boisvert, J. (1999). La formation de la pensée critique. Théorie et pratique. Canada : De Boeck Université (Ed. du Renouveau Pédagogique).
• Calabrese, L. (2014). Paroles de lecteurs : un objet de recherche hybride en sciences du langage. Studii de Lingvisticã, 4, 13-27.
• Conseil de l’Europe (2001). Cadre Européen Commun de Référence pour les Langues : Apprendre, Enseigner, Évaluer. Strasbourg : Didier / Conseil de l’Europe.
• Doury, M., & Lefébure, P. (2006). « Intérêt Général », « Intérêts Particuliers ». La Construction de l’Ethos dans un Débat public. Questions de Communication, 9. Retrieved from https://questionsdecommunication.revues.org/7922.
• Duret, C. (2015). Typologie des usages dans les tribunes en ligne du Journal de Montréal : les articles d’information et chroniques d’opinions revus et corrigés par leurs lecteurs. Communication, Lettres et Sciences du Langage, 9 (1), 53-78. Retrieved from https://clsl.recherche.usherbrooke.ca/.
• Eurrutia Cavero, M. (2013). La société contemporaine et les nouveaux genres discursifs : le récit médiatique. Thélème. Revista Complutense de Estudios Franceses, 28, 105-124.
• Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 7-23. Retrieved from http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/methods/contpap.html.
• Hanna, B.E., & de Nooy, J. (2009). Learning Language and Culture Via Public Internet Discussion Forums. Palgrave Macmillian.
• Klus-Stańska, D. (2002). Konstruowanie wiedzy w szkole. Olsztyn : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.
• Klus-Stańska, D. (2010). Dydaktyka wobec chaosu pojęć i zdarzeń. Warszawa : Wydawnictwo Akademickie ŻAK.
• Kozan, K., &. Caskurslu, S. (2018). On the Nth presence for the Community of Inquiry Framework. Computers & Education, 122, 104-118.
• Kuster, Y., & Lameul, G. (2011). Un cadre d’analyse multidimentionnel de débats en ligne asynchrones. In E. Nissen, F. Poyet, & T. Soubrié (Eds.), Interagir pour apprendre en ligne (pp. 25-43). Grenoble : PUG.
• Lewis, T., & O’Dowd, R. (2016) Online Intercultural Exchange and Foreign Language Learning. In R. O’Dowd & T. Lewis (Eds.) Online Intercultural Exchange. Policy, Pedagogy, Practice (pp. 21-66). Routledge: New York and London.
• Mezirow, J. (2001). Penser son expérience. Une voie vers l’autotransformation. Lyon : Chronique Sociale.
• Mourlhon-Dallies, F. (2007). Communication électronique et genres du discours. Glottopol. Revue de Sociolinguistique en Ligne, 10, 11-23. Retrieved from http://glottopol.univ-rouen.fr/telecharger/numero_10/gpl10_01mourlhon.pdf.
• Newman, D.R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3 (2), 56-77.
• Nonnon, E. (2000). Ce que le récit oral peut nous dire sur le récit. Repères, Recherches en Didactique du Français Langue Maternelle, 21, 23-52.
• Strijbos, J.-W., Martens, R.L., Prins, F.J., & Jochems, W.M.G. (2006). Content analysis. What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29-48.
• Trzebiński, J. (2002). Narracyjne konstruowanie rzeczywistości. In J. Trzebiński (Ed.), Narracja jako sposób rozumienia świata (pp. 17-42). Gdańsk : Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
• Warchala, J., & Skudrzyk, A. (2010). Kultura piśmienności młodego pokolenia. Katowice : Oficyna Wydawnicza Wacław Walasek.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/strop.2019.462.003