2016 | 35 | 4 | 121-132
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
The relation between creative activities and the cities in which they are concentrated is that of mutual influence and dependence. This kind of dynamics is well described by the concept of the creative field by Scott (2006, 2008, 2010, 2014). According to this concept, there is a shared relational context among creative actors in a given place, as well as between them and the local socio-economic-institutional context. Consequently, the economic profile and innovation capacity of a city are determined by the main sectors based there. In this paper, I discuss the role of the creative field in developing the relation between the city of Berlin and creative actors of the fashion design sector, as well as elements of the creative field that are considered relevant by fashion designers in their creative work. This perspective allows the underscoring of some relevant drivers that have made Berlin one of the most relevant places for fashion design in Germany and the whole of Europe. This research has been supported by administrative data from the period 1990–2015, along with personal interviews in the fashion design sector. Shown are not only the existing relations between the urban context and the creative activities of designers, but also how the development of the creative field of the city might be influenced. Consequently, the creative work of fashion designers and their location decisions have to be considered in relation to the creative field as a dynamic combination of variable elements that influence, and are influenced by, each other.
Physical description
  • Institute of Economic and Social Geography, Potsdam University, Germany
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, 2011. Statistisches Jahrbuch.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, Potsdam.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, 2012a. Einwohnerinnen und Einwohner im Land Berlin am 30. Juli 2012. Statistischer Bericht A15-hj 1/12.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, 2012b. Wanderungen Berlin 2012. Statistischer Bericht A III 2-j/12.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, 2012c. Statistisches Jahrbuch. Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, Potsdam.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, 2013. Statistisches Jahrbuch.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, Potsdam.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, 2014. Statistisches Jahrbuch.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, Potsdam.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, 2015. Statistisches Jahrbuch.
  • Amt für Statistik Berlin–Brandenburg, Potsdam.
  • Bagwell S., 2008. Creative clusters and city growth. Creative Industries Journal 1: 31-46.
  • Berlin Partner, 2013. Modestandort Berlin. Designer, Messen, Netzwerke. Berlin Partner GmbH, Berlin.
  • BMWi, 2012. Monitoring zu ausgewählten wirtschaftlichen Eckdaten der Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft 2011. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, Berlin.
  • BMWi, 2015. Monitoring zu ausgewählten wirtschaftlichen Eckdaten der Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft 2014. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, Berlin.
  • Boschma R.A., 2004. Competitiveness of regions from an evolutionary perspective. Rgional Studies 38(9): 1001–1014.
  • Boschma R.A., Fritsch M., 2009. Creative class and regional growth: Empirical evidence from seven European countries. Economic Geography 85(4): 391–423.
  • Brenke K., 2007. Rasantes Wachstum der Zahl kreativ Tätiger in Berlin. Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin 31: 493–496.
  • Brenke K., 2010. Berliner Wirtschaft: Nach langem Schrumpfen auf einem Wachstumspfad. Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin 32: 2–10.
  • Caspari L., 2015. Was die Mieten bremst und was nicht. (accessed 4
  • Feb. 2016).
  • Clark T.N., Lloyd R., Wong K.K., Jain P., 2002. Amenities drive urban growth. Journal of Urban Affairs 24(5): 493–515.
  • Enquete-Kommission, 2007. Schlussbericht zur Kultur in Deutschaland. Deutscher Bundestag, Berlin.
  • Evans G., 2009. Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Studies 46 (5–6):1003–1040.
  • Florida R., 2002. The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New York.
  • Glaeser E., 2005. Smart growth: education, skilled workers & the future of cold-weather cities. Policy Briefs, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  • Geppert K, Mundelius M., 2007. Berlin als Standort der Kreativwirtschaft immer bedeutender. Wochenbericht des DIW Berlin 31: 485–491.
  • Gornig M., 2012. Berliner Wirtschaft: nach Teilung und Transformation auf Wachstumskurs? Zeitschrift für amtliche Statistik Berlin Brandenburg 4: 42–47.
  • Gornig M., Häussermann H., 2002. Berlin: Economic and spatial change. European Urban and Regional Studies 9: 332–341.
  • Gornig M., Kolbe J., Bode R., 2012. Datenanalyse zur Berliner Wirtschaft. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin), Berlin.
  • Hall P., 1998. Cities in civilization. Phoenix, London.
  • Heebels B., van Aalst I., 2010. Creative cluster in Berlin: Entrepreneurship and the quality of place in Prenzlauerberg and Kreuzberg. Geografiska Annaler, Series B 92(4): 347–363.
  • Hoffmann N., Lompscher K., 1998. Milieu, Netzwerke, Verflechtungen. Ansatzpunkte für die Untersuchung regionalwirtschaftlicher Umbruchsprozesse in Deutschland
  • Osten? Ideenskizze zu einem Forschungsdesign. In: Matthieses U. (ed.), Die Räume der Milieus: Neue Tendenzen in der sozial- und raumwissenschaftlichen Milieuforschung, in der Stadt- und Raumplanung. Sigma, Berlin: 247–264.
  • House of Research, 2015. Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaftsindex Berlin–Brandenburg 2015. Stimmungslage, Standortbewertung und die Entwicklung seit 2011. House of Research GmbH, Berlin.
  • Jacobs J., 1961. The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York.
  • Krätke S., 1999. Berlin’s regional economy in the 1990s: Structural adjustment or ‘open-ended’ structural break? European Urban and Regional Studies 6(4): 323–338.
  • Krätke S., 2004. City of talents? Berlin’s regional economy, socio-spatial fabric and “worst practice” urban governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(3): 511–529.
  • Krätke S., 2011. The creative capital of cities. Interactive knowledge creation and urbanization economies of innovation. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  • Krätke S., Borst R., 2000. Berlin: Metropole zwischen Boom und Krise. Leske & Budrich, Opladen.
  • Landry C., 2000. The creative city. A toolkit for urban innovators. Comedia Earthscann, Sterling.
  • Mandel B., 2007. Die neuen Kulturunternehmer. Ihre Motive, Visionen und Erfolgsstrategien. Transcript, Bielefeld.
  • Merkel J., 2008. Kreativquartiere. Urbane Milieus zwischen Inspiration und Prekarität. Sigma, Berlin.
  • Merkel J., 2012. Kreative Milieus. In: Eckardt F. (ed.), Handbuch Stadtsoziologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden: 689–710.
  • Molotch H., 1996. LA as product: How art works in a regional economy. In: Scott A.J., Soja E.W. (eds), The city: Los Angeles and urban theory at the end of the twentieth century.University of California Press, Berkeley, CA: 225–275.
  • Moretti E., 2012. New geography of jobs. Houghton Miffin Harcourt Publishing Company, New York.
  • Mundelius M., 2008. The reliance of Berlin’s creative industries on milieus. VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken.
  • Pratt A., 2005. Cultural industries and public policy. An oxymoron? International Journal of Cultural Policy 11(1): 31–44.
  • Pratt A., 2008. Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography 90(2): 107–117.
  • Scott A.J., 2006a. Creative cities: conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of Urban Affairs 28(1): 1–17.
  • Scott A.J., 2006b. Geography and economy. Three lectures. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Scott A.J., 2008. Social economy of the metropolis: Cognitive-cultural capitalism and the global resurgence of cities. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Scott A.J., 2010. Cultural economy and the creative field of the city. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography 92(2):115–130.
  • Scott A.J., 2014. Beyond the creative city: Cognitive-cultural capitalism and the new urbanism. Regional Studies 48(4): 565–578.
  • Senat WiTF, 2005. Kulturwirtschaft in Berlin. Entwicklungen und Potenziale. Index GmbH, Berlin.
  • Senat WiTF, 2008. Kulturwirtschaft in Berlin. Entwicklungen und Potenziale. Index GmbH, Berlin.
  • Senat WiTF, 2014. Dritter Kreativwirtschaftsbericht. Entwicklung und Potentiale. Senatsverwaltung für Wirtschafts, Technologie und Forschung, Berlin.
  • Staber U., 2008. Network evolution in cultural industries. Industry and Innovation 15(5): 569–578.
  • Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder, 2016. Bruttoinlaandsprodukt, Bruttowertschöpfung in den Ländern der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1991 bis 2015. Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Wüttenberg, Stuttgart.
  • Storper M., 2013. Keys to the city. How economics, institutions, social interaction, and politics shape development. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Storper M., Scott A.J., 2009. Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography 9: 147–167.
  • Stryjakiewicz T., 2010. Location factors of the creative and knowledge-intensive industries in European metropolitan regions. Geographical Journal 62: 3–19.
  • Stryjakiewicz T., Męczyński M., Stachowiak K., 2014. Role of creative industries in the post-socialist urban transformation. Quaestiones Geographicae 33(2): 19–35.
  • Youl Lee S., Florida R., Acs Z., 2004. Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies 38(8): 879–891.
  • Zukin S., 1995. The culture of cities. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Brought
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.