2015 | 13 | 2 | 181-198
Article title

Phonological Factors Affecting L1 Phonetic Realization of Proficient Polish Users of English

Title variants
Languages of publication
Acoustic phonetic studies examine the L1 of Polish speakers with professional level proficiency in English. The studies include two tasks, a production task carried out entirely in Polish and a phonetic code-switching task in which speakers insert target Polish words or phrases into an English carrier. Additionally, two phonetic parameters are studied: the oft-investigated VOT, as well as glottalization vs. sandhi linking of word-initial vowels. In monolingual Polish mode, L2 interference was observed for the VOT parameter, but not for sandhi linking. It is suggested that this discrepancy may be related to the differing phonological status of the two phonetic parameters. In the code-switching tasks, VOTs were on the whole more English-like than in monolingual mode, but this appeared to be a matter of individual performance. An increase in the rate of sandhi linking in the code-switches, except for the case of one speaker, appeared to be a function of accelerated production of L1 target items.
Physical description
  • Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Kroos, C. (2010). Language context elicits native-like stop voicing in early bilinguals’ productions in both L1 and L2. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 640-653.
  • Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., & Kroos, C. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 558-570.
  • Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In M. Munro & O. S. Bohn (Eds.), Second language speech learning – the role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp 13-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Brunner, J., & Żygis, M. (2012). Why do glottal stops and low vowels like each other? Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 376-379.
  • Bullock, B., & Toribio, A. (2009). Trying to hit a moving target: On the sociophonetics of code-switching. In L. Isurin, D. Winford, & K. De Bot (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to code-switching (pp 189-206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Chang, C. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 249-268.
  • Cook, A. (2000). American Accent Training. Hauppage, NY: Barrron’s.
  • Cruttenden, A. (2001). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English (6th ed.). London: Arnold.
  • Davidson, L., & Erker, D. (2014). Hiatus resolution in American English: the case against glide insertion. Language, 90(2), 482-514.
  • Dilley, L., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Ostendorf, M. (1996). Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 423-444.
  • Dogil, G. (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress in Polish, Lithuanian, Spanish, and German. In H. van der Hulst (Ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe (pp 273-311). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47-65.
  • Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.
  • Garellek, M. (2012). Word-initial glottalization and voice quality strengthening. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 111, 92-122.
  • Grosjean, F. (1998). Studying bilinguals - methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131-149.
  • Grosjean, F., & Miller J. L. (1994). Going in and out of languages: An example of bilingual flexibility. Psychological Science, 5, 201-206.
  • Harada, T. (2003). L2 influence on L1 speech in the production of VOT. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1085-1088.
  • Kraska-Szlenk, I., & Żygis, M. (2012). Phonetic and lexical gradience in the Polish prefixed words. Cognitive Linguistics, 23, 317-336.
  • Maddieson, I. (1997). Phonetic universals. In W. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (pp 619-639). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Major. R. (1992). Losing English as a first language. The Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 190-208.
  • Munro, M. (2008). Foreign accent and speech intelligibility. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp 193-218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Newlin-Łukowicz, L. (2012). Polish Stress: looking for phonetic evidence of a bidirectional system. Phonology, 29(2), 271-329.
  • Olson, D. (2012). The phonetics of insertional code-switching – suprasegmental analysis and a case for hyper-articulation. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(4), 439-457.
  • Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C.A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 27(4), 421-436.
  • Schwartz, G. (2013). Vowel hiatus at Polish word boundaries – phonetic realization and phonological implications. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 49(4), 557-585.
  • Strange, W., & Shafer, V. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: the reeducation of selective perception. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp 153-192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Sypiańska, J. (2013). Quantity and quality of language use and L1 attrition of Polish due to L2 Danish and L3 English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań.
  • Umeda, N. (1978). Occurrence of glottal stops in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 81-94.
  • Waniek-Klimczak, E. (2011). Aspiration and style: a sociophonetic study of VOT in Polish learners of English. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, M. Wrembel, & M. Kul (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the SLA of speech: New Sounds 2010. Vol 1 (pp 303-316). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Wiese, R. (1996). The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Zampini, M. (2008). L2 speech production research: Findings, issues, and advances. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp 219-250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.