2016 | 14 | 1 | 1-14
Article title

Pre-Fortis Shortening in Czech English: A Production and Reaction-Time Study

Title variants
Languages of publication
This study focuses on the production and perception of English words with a fortis vs. lenis obstruent in the syllable coda. The contrast is mostly cued by the duration of the preceding vowel, which is shorter before fortis than before lenis sounds in native speech. In the first experiment we analyzed the production of 10 Czech speakers of English and compared them to two native controls. The results showed that the Czech speakers did not sufficiently exploit duration to cue the identity of the word-final obstruent. In the second experiment we manipulated C and V durations in target words to transplant the native ratios onto the Czech-accented speech, enhancing the fortis-lenis contrast, and vice versa. 108 listeners took part in a word-monitoring task in which reaction times were measured. The hypothesized advantage to items in which the target word (with a fortis or lenis obstruent) was semantically congruent with the following context was not confirmed, and subsequent analyses showed that the words’ frequency of use and the collocations they enter into strongly affect speech processing and correlate to a large degree with the reaction times.
Physical description
  • Benko, V. 2014. Aranea: Yet Another Family of (Comparable) Web Corpora. In P. Sojka, A. Horák, I. Kopeček and K. Pala (eds.), Text, Speech and Dialogue. 17th International Conference, TSD 2014, LNCS 8655, 257-264.
  • Blevins, J. 2006. A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32, 117-166.
  • Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2015. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.4.20. [Computer programme]. Available from:
  • Bybee, J. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP.
  • Chen, M. 1970. Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22, 129-159.
  • Černikovská, Š. and P. Čermák. in print. Rysy cizineckého přízvuku ve španělštině českých mluvčích. Časopis pro moderní filologii.
  • Derwing, T. M. and M. J. Munro. 2011. Intelligibility, comprehensibility and accent: Their relevance to pronunciation teaching. Speak Out! IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Newsletter X: 1-5.
  • Derwing, T. M. and M. J. Rossiter. 2003. The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented speech. Applied Language Learning 13, 1-17.
  • Fejlová, D. 2013. Pre-fortis shortening in fluent read speech: A comparison of Czech and native speakers of English. AUC Philologica 1/2014, Phonetica Pragensia XIII, 101-112.
  • Forster, K. I. and J. C. Forster. 2003. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 35/1, 116-124.
  • Goldinger, S. and T. Azuma. 2003. Puzzle-solving science: The quixotic quest for units in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 31, 305-320.
  • Grosjean, F. and U. H. Frauenfelder. 1996. A Guide to Spoken Word Recognition Paradigms: Introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 11/6, 553-558.
  • Grossberg, S. 2003. Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 31, 423-445.
  • Hahn, L. D. 2004. Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly 38, 201-223.
  • Jessen, M. 1998. Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kilborn, K. and H. Moss. 1996. Word Monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes 11/6, 689-694.
  • Kohler, K. J. 1984. Phonetic explanation in phonology: the feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica 41, 150-174.
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. 2011. A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (ed.), Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, 48-72. London: Routledge.
  • Machač, P. and R. Skarnitzl. 2009. Principles of Phonetic Segmentation. Praha: Epocha.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. 1990. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (ed.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives, 148-172. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mehler, J., Dommergues, J., Frauenfelder, U. H. and J. Segui. 1981. The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 298-305.
  • Moulines, R. and F. Charpentier. 1990. Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Communication 9, 453-467.
  • Munro, M. J. and T. M. Derwing. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning 45, 73-97.
  • Repp, B. H. 1982. Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin 92, 81-110.
  • Sendlmeier, W. F. 1995. Feature, phoneme, syllable or word: How is speech mentally represented? Phonetica 52, 131-143.
  • Skarnitzl, R. and P. Šturm. 2014. Assimilation of voicing in Czech speakers of English: The effect of the degree of accentedness. Research in Language 12(2), 199-208.
  • Skarnitzl, R., Volín, J. and L. Drenková. 2005. Tangibility of Foreign Accents in Speech: the Case of Czech English. In: A. Grmelová, L. Dušková and M. Farrell (eds.), 2nd Prague Conference on Linguistics and Literary Studies Proceedings,11-20. Praha: PedF UK.
  • Smith, B. L., Hayes-Harb, R., Bruss, M. and A. Harker. 2009. Production and perception of voicing and devoicing in similar German and English word pairs by native speakers of German. Journal of Phonetics 37, 257-275.
  • Šturm, P. and J. Volín. 2012. Syllables versus phones in a word-monitoring experiment. Studies in Applied Linguistics 3(1-2), 25-34.
  • Wedel, A. 2011. Self-organization in phonology. In M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewan, E. Hume and K. Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 130-147. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Zampini, M. L. 2008. L2 speech production research: Findings, issues, and advances. In J. G. H. Edwards and M. L. Zampini (eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition, 219-249. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.