Teaching the pronunciation of sentence final and word boundary stops to French learners of English: distracted imitation versus audio-visual explanations

• Authors: Maelle Amand , Zakaria Touhami
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Studies on stop unrelease in second language acquisition have hitherto focused on the productions of Slavic learners of English (Šimačkova & Podlipsky, 2015) and experiments on Polish learners of English; the latter show the tendency to release stops on a more regular basis depending on the type of stop combinations (Rojczyk et al. 2013). In the present study, we aim to test the efficiency of audio-visual explanations as opposed to distracted imitation in pronunciation teaching amongst French learners of English. While unreleased stops are rather frequent in French and English - especially in plosives clusters (Byrd, 1993; Davidson, 2010), unreleased plosives in final positions are less common in French (Van Dommelen, 1983). During phase 1 of the experiment, three groups of 12 native French learners of English (level A1/A2, B1/B2 and C1/C2) were asked to read idiomatic expressions containing both homogeneous and heterogeneous sequences of voiceless stops straddled between words, namely, in sequences like “that cat” [dat˺ kat˺], and stops at the end of sentences like “I told him to speak” [tə spiːk˺]. In the second phase of the experiment, one half in each group was given a different task. The first group heard recorded versions of phase 1 sentences and before reading them out loud, counted up to five in their L1. Stimuli for imitation contained no release in the contexts under scrutiny. The other half had to watch a video explaining the phenomenon of unreleased stops with a production of phase-two expressions propped up by hand gestures. They were then asked to re-read the sentences given in phase 1. Based on these results the current study makes recommendations about what working environment should be prioritized in pronunciation teaching both in class and online (Kroger et al. 2010), and suggests ways to assess students and visually keep track of their progress.

Keywords

EN

Second-language acquisition; unreleased stops; imitation; audio-visual teaching; L2 pronunciation; e-learning; pronunciation teaching

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 377-388

Dates

published

2016-12-30

Contributors

author

Maelle Amand

• Université Paris Diderot

author

Zakaria Touhami

• University of Newcastle

References

• Babel, M. 2012. Evidence for Phonetic and Social Selectivity in Spontaneous Phonetic Imitation. Journal of Phonetics 40. 177-189.
• Bałutowa, B. 1974. Wymowa Angielska dla Wszystkich. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
• Bergier, M. 2010. ‘The Occurrence of Unreleased Oral Stops in English Voice Agreeing Plosive Clusters Straddling Word Boundaries. Production Experiments with Polish Advanced Learners of English.’ Unpublished M. A. Thesis. University of Silesia.
• Boersma, P. 2001. Praat, a System for Doing Phonetics by Computer. Glot International 10. 341-345.
• Byrd, D. 1993. 54,000 American Stops. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 83. 1-19.
• Crystal, T. H. and A. S. House. 1988. The Duration of American-English Stop Consonants. Journal of Phonetics 16. 285-294.
• Davidson, L. 2010. Variation in Stop Releases in American English Spontaneous Speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128. 2458-.
• Gattegno, C. 1963. Teaching Foreign Languages in Schools: The Silent Way Reading. Educational Explorers.
• Goldin-Meadow, S. 2003. Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Goldin-Meadow, S. and S. M. Wagner. 2005. How our Hands Help Us Learn. Trends in Cognitive Science 9. 234-241.
• Ginesy, M. 2005. Memento de phonetique anglaise. Paris : Armand Colin.Haines, R. 2007. Des Occlusives en Coda ? Une etude comparative du francais et de l’anglais britannique. 1eresJournees des Sciences de la Parole.
• Henderson, J. B. and B. H. Repp. 1982. Is a Stop Consonant Released When Followed by Another Stop Consonant? Phonetica 39. 71-82.
• Hothorn, T., K. Hornik and A. Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15. 651-674.
• Kelly, S. D. et al. 2002. A Helping Hand in Assessing Children’s Knowledge: Instructing Adults to Attend to Gesture. Cognition and Instruction 20. 1-26.
• Kroger, B. J. et al. 2010. Audiovisual Tools for Phonetic and Articulatory Visualization in Computer-Aided Pronunciation Training. Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5967. 337-345.
• Ladefoged, P. 1974. Elements of Acoustic Phonetics. Chicago U P.
• Le, S., Josse, J. and F. Husson. 2008. FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25. 1-18.
• Łyda, A. and K. Szcześniak. 2013. Awareness in Action: The Role of Consciousness in Language Acquisition. Springer.
• Mańkowska, A., M. Nowacka and M. Kłoczowska. 2009. How Much Wood Would a Woodchuck Chuck?: English Pronunciation Practice Book. Krakow: Wydawnictwo WSE.
• Messum, P. 2012. ‘Teaching Pronunciation Without Using Imitation.’ Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, 154-160. 7-8 October 2011. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
• Messum, P. and R. Young. 2012. Non-Imitative Ways of Teaching Pronunciation: Why and How. IATEFL Fielded Discussion and Report, Pronunciation Science. London.
• Pawlak, M., E. Waniek-Klimczak and J. Majer (eds.). 2011. Speaking and Instructed Foreign Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters Roach, P. 2001. English Phonetics and Phonology. 3rd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rojczyk, A. 2008. Release Burst in Polish Homorganic Stop Geminates. Linguistica Silesiana 29. 75-86.
• Skehan, P. 1991. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13. 275-98.
• Šimačkova, Š. and V. J. Podlipsky. 2015. ‘Pronunciation of L2 Sounds at Word Boundaries: Stop-Stop Sequences in Czech English.’ Paper presented at the EPIP4 4th International Conference on English Pronunciation: Issues & Practices, 21-23 May 2015. Prague.
• Sobkowiak, W. 2001. English Phonetics for Poles. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
• Van Dommelen, W. 1983. Parameter Interaction in the Perception of French Plosives. Phonetica 40. 32-62.
• Viel, M. and R. Lilly. 1998. La prononciation de l’anglais. Rčgles phonologiques et exercices de transcription. Paris : Hachette Superieur.
• Wrembel, M. 2005. ‘Phonological Metacompetence in the Acquisition of Second Language Acquisition.’ Unpublished PhD thesis. Adam Mikiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/rela-2016-0020