Aiming for Cognitive Equivalence – Mental Models as a Tertium Comparationis for Translation and Empirical Semantics

• Authors: Pawel Sickinger
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper introduces my concept of cognitive equivalence (cf. Mandelblit, 1997), an attempt to reconcile elements of Nida’s dynamic equivalence with recent innovations in cognitive linguistics and cognitive psychology, and building on the current focus on translators’ mental processes in translation studies (see e.g. Göpferich et al., 2009, Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 2010). My approach shares its general impetus with Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk’s concept of re-conceptualization, but is independently derived from findings in cognitive linguistics and simulation theory (see e.g. Langacker, 2008; Feldman, 2006; Barsalou, 1999; Zwaan, 2004). Against this background, I propose a model of translation processing focused on the internal simulation of reader reception and the calibration of these simulations to achieve similarity between ST and TT impact. The concept of cognitive equivalence is exemplarily tested by exploring a conceptual / lexical field (MALE BALDNESS) through the way that English, German and Japanese lexical items in this field are linked to matching visual-conceptual representations by native speaker informants. The visual data gathered via this empirical method can be used to effectively triangulate the linguistic items involved, enabling an extra-linguistic comparison across languages. Results show that there is a reassuring level of inter-informant agreement within languages, but that the conceptual domain for BALDNESS is linguistically structured in systematically different ways across languages. The findings are interpreted as strengthening the call for a cognition-focused, embodied approach to translation.

Keywords

EN

translation equivalence; cognitive translation studies; translation processing; empirical semantics; cross-linguistic comparison; simulation semantics; perceptual symbol systems; re-conceptualisation

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 15
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 213-236

Dates

published

2017-06-30

Contributors

author

Pawel Sickinger

• University of Bonn

References

• Al-Hasnawi, Ali R. 2007. A Cognitive Approach to Translating Metaphors. Translation Journal 11(3) [Online]. Available from http://www.bokorlang.com/journal/41metaphor.htm [Accessed: 14th September 2016].
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 577–660.
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2002. Being There Conceptually: Simulating Categories in Preparation For Situated Action. In Nancy L. Stein, Patricia J. Bauer and Mitchell Rabinowitz (eds.), Representation, memory, and development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler. 1–15. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59. 617–645.
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2009. Simulation, Situated Conceptualization, and Prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 364. 1281–1289.
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2012. The human conceptual system. In Michael Spivey, Ken McRae and Marc Joanisse (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 239–258. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. et al. 2008. Language and Simulation in Conceptual Processing. In Manuel de Vega, Arthur M. Glenberg and Arthur C. Graesser (eds.), Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition, 245–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bergen, Benjamin. 2007. Experimental Methods for Simulation Semantics. In Monica Gonzalez-Marquez et al. (eds.), Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, 277–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Deacon, Terrence W. 1997. The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
• Fauconnier, Gilles. 2000. Methods and Generalizations. In Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker (eds.), Scope and Foundations of Cognitive Linguistics, 95-128. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.
• Feldman, Jerome A. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Frames and the Semantics of Understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2), 222–254.
• Geeraerts, Dirk. 2006. Introduction: A Rough Guide to Cognitive Linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings, 1–28. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
• Geeraerts, Dirk, Grondelaers, Stefan and Peter Bakema. 1994. The Structure of Lexical Variation. Meaning, Naming, and Context. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
• Goldman, Alvin I. 2006. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Göpferich, Susanne. 2008. Translationsprozessforschung – Stand, Methoden, Perspektiven. Tübingen: Narr.
• Göpferich, Susanne, Jakobsen, Arnt L. and Inger M. Mees (eds.). 2009. Behind the mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur. (Copenhagen Studies in Language 37)
• Halverson, Sandra L. 2014. Reorienting Translation Studies: Cognitive Approaches and the Centrality of the Translator. In Juliane House (ed.), Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach, 116-139. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Holz-Mänttärri, Justa. 1990. Funktionskonstanz - eine Fiktion? In Heidemarie Salevsky (ed.), Übersetzungswissenschaft und Sprachmittlerausbildung: Akten der ersten internationalen Konferenz Übersetzungswissenschaft und Sprachmittlerausbildung, 66–74. Berlin: Humboldt Universität.
• House, Juliane. 1997. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Tübingen: Narr.
• House, Juliane. 2008. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Translation as Re-contextualization and a Third Space Phenomenon. Linguistica Antverpiensia 7. 149–175.
• House, Juliane. 2015. Towards a New Linguistic-Cognitive Orientation in Translation Studies. In Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich and Sharon O’Brien (eds.), Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research, 35–47. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Koller, Werner. 1979. Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg and Wiesbaden: Quelle and Meyer.
• Krings, Hans P. 2005. Wege ins Labyrinth: Fragestellungen und Methoden der Übersetzungsprozessforschung im Überblick. Meta 50(2), 342–358.
• Labov, William. 1973. The Boundaries of Words and Their Meanings. In Charles-James N. Bailey, and Roger W. Shuy (eds.), New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, 340–373. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
• Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
• Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. 2010. Re-conceptualization and the Emergence of Discourse Meaning as a Theory of Translation. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcel Thelen (eds.), Meaning in Translation, 105-147. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
• Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. 2015. Equivalence. In Lukasz Bogucki (ed.), Ways to Translation, 11-54. Lodz: University of Lodz.
• Mandelblit, Nili. 1996. The Cognitive View of Metaphor and its Implications for Translation Theory. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and Marcel Thelen (eds.), Translation and Meaning, Part 3, 483–495. Maastricht: Universitaire Press.
• Mandelblit, Nili. 1997. Grammatical Blending: Creative and Schematic Aspects in Sentence Processing and Translation. [Online] Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
• Available from: http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~faucon/NILI/contents.html [Accessed: 14th September 2016].
• Nida, Eugene A. 1964. Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: Brill Archive.
• Nida, Eugene A. and Charles R. Taber. 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. London, New York and Stuttgart: United Bible Societies. (Helps for Translators 8)
• Norwood, O’Tar T. 1975. Male Pattern Baldness: Classification and Incidence. Southern Medical Journal 68(11). 1359–1365.
• Pym, Anthony. 1997. Koller’s Äquivalenz Revisited. The Translator 3(1). 71–79.
• Pym, Anthony. 2010. Exploring Translation Theories. London and New York: Routledge.
• Reiss, Katharina, and Hans J. Vermeer 1984. Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Amsterdam: de Gruyter. (Linguistische Arbeiten 147)
• Risku, Hanna. 2000. Situated Translation und Situated Cognition: ungleiche Schwestern. In Mira Kadric et al. (eds.), Translationswissenschaft. Festschrift für Mary Snell-Hornby zum 60. Geburtstag, 81-91. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
• Risku, Hanna and Florian Windhager. 2015. Extended Translation: A Sociocognitive Research Agenda. In Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich and Sharon O'Brien (eds.), Interdisciplinarity in Translation and Interpreting Process Research, 35–47. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Schleiermacher, Friedrich D. E. 1814. Alte Literatur: Ueber die Farbengebung des Alterthümlichen in Verdeutschung alter klassischer Prosa. Die Musen. 102-120.
• Seleskovitch, Danica and Marianne Lederer. 1989. Pédagogie raisonnée de l’interprétation. Paris: Didier.
• Sickinger, Pawel. 2012. Mental Models and Linguistic Cues: Investigating the Interface Between Language and Mental Representation Across Cultures. 35th International LAUD Symposium: Cognitive psycholinguistics: Bilingualism, cognition and communication, 125–146. Essen: LAUD.
• Sickinger, Pawel. (forthcoming). The Root of all Meaning: Embodied, Simulated Meaning as the Basis of Translational Equivalence. Minutes of Translata II, Innsbruck University.
• Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Snell-Hornby, Mary. 1988. Translation Studies. An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Taheri-Ardali, Mortaza, Bagheri, Mohammad and Reza Eidy. 2013. Towards a New Model To Metaphor Translation: A Cognitive Approach. Iranian Journal of Translation Studies 11(41). 35–52.
• Venuti, Lawrence. 1998. The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of the Difference. London and New York: Routledge.
• Vermeer, Hans J. 1994. Übersetzen als kultureller Transfer. In Mary Snell-Hornby (ed.), Übersetzungswissenschaft – Eine Neuorientierung, 30–53. Tübingen: Franke Verlag.
• Wilss, Wolfram. 1990. Cognitive Aspects of the Translation Process. (Translated by Roger C. Norton). Language and Communication 10. 19–36.
• Zwaan, Rolf A. 2004. The immersed Experiencer: Toward an Embodied Theory of Language Comprehension. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 44. 35–62.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/rela-2017-0013