PL EN


2015 | 6 | 2 | 210-225
Article title

Cultural dimension of individualism and collectivism and its perceptual and cognitive correlates in cross-cultural research

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This paper reviews the current findings on the dimension of individualism/collectivism, which might be a useful tool for the comparison of different cultures and for the investigation of the effect of culture as a psychological concept on individual mental processes. The validity and reliability of the concept of the dimension of individualism/collectivism is discussed. The related theory of analytic and holistic thinking is introduced within a framework of extensive comparative research in the field of cross-cultural psychology. Several interesting research designs on cross-cultural differences in cognition and perception are described. The empirical part contains a short report of research conducted on a sample (N=92) of Czech and Czech Vietnamese university students using a scale of horizontal and vertical individualism/collectivism (Bartoš, 2010). The results do not fully support the traditional view of individualistic Europeans and collectivistic Asians.
Year
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
210-225
Physical description
Dates
published
2020-01-02
Contributors
  • Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University in Brno Žerotínovo nám. 617/9, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic and Mendel University in Brno Zemědělská 1/1665, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
References
  • Bartoš, F. (2010). Individualismus a kolektivismus v české populaci a jejich souvislosti s narcismem [Individualism and collectivism of Czech population and their Relation to Narcissism]. Sociológia, 2. 134-161.
  • Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D. L. (2012). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bond, M. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of personality and social psychology, 55(6). 1009-1015.
  • Bond, M. (2002). Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede's ecological analysis- a 20-year odyssey: comment on Oyserman et al.(2002). Psychological bulletin, 128(1), 73-77.
  • Briley, D. A., Morris, M. W. & Simonson, I. (2000). Reasons as Carriers of Culture: Dynamic versus Dispositional Models of Cultural Influence on Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2).157-178.
  • Buchtel, E. & Norenzayan, A. (2008). Which should you use, intuition or logic? Cultural differences in injunctive norms about reasoning. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(4). 264-273.
  • Cerha, O. (2013). Kulturní a interkulturní psychologie [Cultural and cross-cultural psychology]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
  • Cozma, I. (2011). How are individualism and collectivism measured? Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(1). 11-17.
  • Čeněk, J., Smolík, J., & Vykoukalová, Z. (in print). Interkulturní psychologie: Vybrané kapitoly [Cross-cultural psychology: Selected chapters]. Brno: Grada.
  • Deregowski, J. B. (1980). Illusions, patterns and pictures. London: Academic Press.
  • Doi, T. (1963). Amae: A key concept for understanding Japanese personality structure. In: V R. K. Beardsley, & R. J. Smith (Eds.), Japanese culture: Its development and characteristics (pp. 132-138). London: Routledge.
  • Duffy, S., Toriyama, R., Itakura, S., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Development of cultural strategies of attention in North American and Japanese children. Journal of experimental child psychology, 102(3). 351-359.
  • Fiske, A. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures--a critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: comment on Oyserman et al.(2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1). 78-88.
  • Freidingerová, T. (2014). Vietnamci v česku a ve světě [Vietnamese in Czech Republic and in the world]. Praha: SLON.
  • Gardner, W., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4). 321-326.
  • Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K. & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construal, and individual values on communicationstyles across cultures. Human communication research, 510-543.
  • Heine, S., Lehman, D., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(6). 903-918.
  • Herskovits, M. J. (1955). Cultural anthropology. New York: Knopf.
  • Hewstone, M., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Sociální psychologie: Moderní učebnice sociální psychologie [Introduction to social psychology: a European perspective]. Praha: Portál.
  • Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of international business studies, 14(2).75-89.
  • Chiu, L.H. (1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 7(4). 235-242.
  • Chudzikowski, K., Fink, G., Mayrhofer, W., Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011). The evolution of Hofstede's doctrine. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1). 10-20.
  • Jahoda, G. (1992). Crossroads Between Culture and Mind: Continuities and Change in Theories of Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kastanakis, M., & Voyer, B. (2013). The effect of culture on perception and cognition: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(4). 425-433.
  • Kim, U., Yang , K.-S., & Hwang, K.-K. (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
  • Kitayama, S., & Cohen, D. (2010). Handbook of Cultural Psychology. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual review of psychology, 62. 419-449.
  • Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T. & Larsen, J. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14(3). 201-206.
  • Kluckhohn, K. (1954). Culture and behavior. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). 921-976. MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Kraus, J., & al. (2007). Nový akademický slovník cizích slov [New academic dictionary of foreign words]. Praha: Academia.
  • Leung, T., & Kim, M. S. (1997). A revised self-construal scale. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
  • Levine, T., Bresnahan, M., Park, H., Lapinski, M., Wittenbaum, G., Shearman, S., a další. (2003). Self-Construal Scales Lack Validity. Human Communication Research, 29(2). 210-252.
  • Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2007). Developing a new measure of independent and interdependent views of the self. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1). 249-257.
  • Lutz, C. (1988). Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to western theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2). 224-253.
  • Masuda, T. & Nisbett, R. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(5). 922-934.
  • Masuda, T. & Nisbett, R. (2006). Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science, 30(2). 381-399.
  • Matsumoto, D. (2000). Culture and psychology: People around the world. Belmont (USA): Thomson Learning.
  • Matsumoto, D. & Yoo, S. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3). 234-250.
  • Matsumoto, D., Kudoh, T. & Takeuchi, S. (1996). Changing patterns of individualism and collectivism in the United States and Japan. Culture & Psychology, 2(1). 77-107.
  • Minkov, M. & Hofstede, G. (2010). Hofstede's fifth dimension: New evidence from the World Values Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(1). 3-14.
  • Nisbett, R. & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19). 11163-11170.
  • Nisbett, R. & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(10). 467-473.
  • Nisbett, R., Peng, K., Choi, I. & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological review, 108(2). 291-310.
  • Norenzayan, A., Smith, E., Kim, B. & Nisbett, R. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5). 653-684.
  • Norenzayan, A., Smith, E., Kim, B. & Nisbett, R. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5). 653-684.
  • Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological bulletin, 134(2). 311-342.
  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological bulletin, 128(1). 3-72.
  • Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M. & Coon, H. (2002). Cultural psychology, A new look: reply to Bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and Miller (2002). Psychological bulletin,128(1). 110-117.
  • Peng, K. & Nisbett, R. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54(9). 741-754.
  • Peng, K. & Nisbett, R. E. (1999). Culture, Dialectics, and Reasoning about Contradiction. Science Watch, 54(9). 741-754.
  • Redfield, R. (1941). The folk culture of Yucatan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Rensink, R., O'Regan, J. & Clark, J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological science, 8(5). 368-373.
  • Rivers, W. H. (1905). Observations of the senses of the Todas. British Journal of Psychology, 1. 321-396.
  • Rosaldo, M. Z. (1980). Knowledge and passion: Ilongot notions on self and social life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W. & Poortinga, Y. H. (1990). Human behavior in global perspective. Heedham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Shiraev, E. B. & Levy, D. A. (2007). Cross-cultural psychology: critical thinking and contemporary applications (5.edition.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  • Shiraev, E. B. & Levy, D. A. (2013). Cross-Cultural psychology: Critical Thinking and Contemporary Applications. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  • Schimmack, U., Oishi, S. & Diener, E. (2005). Individualism: A valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1). 17-31.
  • Schwartz, S. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and. Journal of social issues, 50(4). 19-45.
  • Schwartz, S. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied psychology, 48(1). 23-47.
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-Collectivism: Critigue and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(2). 139-157.
  • Schwartz, S. & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(5). 878-891.
  • Schwartz, S. & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of research in personality, 38(3). 230-255.
  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and social psychological bulletin, 20(5). 580-591.
  • Singelis, T., Triandis, H., Bhawuk, D. & Gelfand, M. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural research, 29(3). 240-275.
  • Smith, P., Dugan, S. & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees a dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 27(2) 231-264.
  • Steinthal, H. (1858). Der Ursprung der Sprache [The origins of language]. Berlín: Dummler.
  • Takano, Y. & Osaka, E. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the US on individualism/collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(3). 311-341.
  • Triandis, H. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndromes. American Psychologist, 51(4). 407-415.
  • Triandis, H. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of personality, 69(6). 907-924.
  • Triandis, H. & Gelfand, M. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(1), 118.
  • Triandis, H., Leung, K., Villareal, M. & Clack, F. (1985). Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in personality, 19(4). 395-415.
  • Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture. New York: Harper.
  • Tylor, E. B. (1889). On a method of investigating the development of institutions. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 18. 245-272.
  • Uskul, A., Kitayama, S. & Nisbett, R. (2008). Ecocultural basis of cognition: Farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(25). 8552-8556.
  • Van de Vliert, E. (2006). Autocratic Leadership Around the Globe Do Climate and Wealth Drive Leadership Culture? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(1). 42-59.
  • Voronov, M. & Singer, J. (2002). The myth of individualism-collectivism: A critical review. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(4).461-480.
  • Wierzbicka, A. (1986). Human emotions: Universal or culture-specific? American Anthropologist, 88(3). 584-594.
  • Wundt, W. (1900-1914). Völkerpsychologie [The psychology of nations] Leipzig: Engelmann.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15503_jecs20152_210_225
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.