The investigation of effectiveness of individual and group forms of learning a foreign language in Kazakhstan
Languages of publication
It is known that the language classroom is the place where teachers and learners come together for interaction and students can learn English in natural settings. Group work is a teaching strategy at all levels of education and researchers have observed that group based assignments and discussions are a common feature of tertiary education. The effective use of group work in the language class can provide a valuable learning experience to students and give them the opportunity to practically experience the language exposure of the ideas presented and strengthen their learning. In this regard, this paper attempts to identify the efficiency of individual and group work teaching strategy of the students to excel at foreign language learning. Then, the paper aims to define the effect of individual and group work of students’ value participation in academic communication. Finally, the paper tries to determine the most effective methods for working in a group and individually with the help of the data obtained with the help of a purpose-designed questionnaire to assess their preference for different teaching methods.
- International Cooperation and Multilingual Education Development Centre, S.Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical University, Pobeda Street 62, Astana, Kazakhstan
- Faculty of Philology, L.N.Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Munaitpassova Street 5, Astana, Kazakhstan
- Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: conditions for positive small groups. Review of educational research, 64(1), 1-35.
- Chirac, E.H., (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning – students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology, 558(5).
- Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., & Stecker, P.M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional children, 76(3), 301-323.
- Groening, I. (1996). Learning together - group work in preschools and school. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
- Johnson W.D., & Johnson R.T. (1992). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning: Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
- Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Longman Handbooks for language teachers. Malaysia: Eighth impression.
- Heit, H., (2004). Effective instruction for creating a classroom community: A brief study of contributing factors in group work. Teaching for social justice. British scientific journal. 103(03), 53-63.
- Hammar Chiriac, & Hempel. (2008). Handbook for group work: Establishing functioning group work in education. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
- Pica, T. P. (1988). Communicative language teaching: An aid to second language acquisition? Some insights from classroom research. English Quarterly, 90(1), 70-80.
- Sarkisian, E. (1997-2010). Working in groups. Derek book center for teaching and learning. Harvard University. Retrieved February 23, 2015, from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/html/icb.topic58474/wigintro.html.
- State program of education development in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2005–2010
- approved by the President’s of the Republic of Kazakhstan order. (2004). No 1459.
- Slavin, R.E. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: Areconciliation. Child Development, 58(5), 1161-1167. Retrieved March 29, 2013, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1130612.
- Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
- Webb, N.M., & Palincsar, A.S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D.C. Berliner, R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873). New York: Macmillan.
- Zhaitapova, А.А., & Nametkulova, F.Zh. (2013). Озық педагогикалық тәжірибені
- зерттеу әдістемесі [Methodology of the best pedagogical researches]. Open school
- journal, 8.
Publication order reference