Creating a Culture-Based Language Learning Course for Developing Adult Learners’ 21st Century Skills

• Authors: Ineta Luka
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Aim. The aim of the study is to research ways of developing adult learners’ 21st century skills in a culture-based language learning course applying innovative teaching/learning tools and methodologies considering adult learners’ specific needs and special educational treatment required to overcome learning barriers. Methods. Data collection methods include teachers’ accounts in the form of reflective essays on their pedagogical experience collected from 14 teachers. For data analysis and interpretation constant comparative method to elicit themes/categories and create construct mapping to make connections between ideas and themes has been used. Results and conclusion. An on-line learning course for adult learners, including blended-learning, must be based on classic adult learning principles considering the given socio-cultural context, learners’ backgrounds, needs, motivation, learning styles and strategies. The adult learners’ skills developed and cultural knowledge increased will help them in enriching their knowledge and competences, thus leading to higher upskilling and higher employability and quality, as well as becoming true lifelong learners. Research restrictions. The current paper deals with the analysis of the first stage of the research – teachers’ feedback and course creation. The second stage comprising observation and feedback obtained during the course piloting eliciting learners’ and teachers’ data will be analysed in a later article. Practical application. The research findings are useful in selecting suitable methodologies and approaches for language learning courses for adult learners, possibly for other courses as well. Originality/Cognitive value. The current research enables understanding adult learning context and specifics to secure special educational treatment required to overcome learning barriers and develop adult learners’ 21st century skills in a culture-based blended-learning course.

Keywords

EN

adult teaching/learning, language competence, 21st century skills, blended-learning

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 151-169

Dates

published

2019-09-02

Contributors

author

Ineta Luka

• Turiba University Graudu 68, Riga LV-1058, Latvia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-1663

References

• Alksne, A. (2018). The Problem of will: Psychological, Pedagogical and Caritative Social Assessment. Society, Integration, Education, 1, 28-34.
• Allen, E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending In: The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
• Aubrey, K., & Riley, A. (2016). Understanding and Using Educational Theories. London: SAGE.
• Avota, B. (2017). Distance Learning for Health Care Professionals – Challenges, Opportunities and Solutions. Society, Integration, Education, 1, 27-36.
• Bimmel, P., & Rampillon, U. (2000). Lernerautonomie und Lernstrategien. München: Langescheidt.
• Bojare, I., & Skrinda, A. (2016). Transformation of the System of Values of Autonomous Learning for English Acquisition in Blended E-Studies for Adults: A Holistic Fractal Model. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 119-134
• Bojāre, I. (2014). Autonomous English Acquisition in Blended E-Studies for Adults for Sustainable Development: Active Research. Society, Integration, Education, 2, 291-299.
• Bond, T. (2011). The good teacher. In: T.T. Kidd, I. Chen (Eds.), Ubiquitous learning: Strategies for Pedagogy, Course Design, and Technology (pp. 197-207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
• Brizga, D. (2016). Implementation of Pedagogical Activity of Labour Protection Specialists in Work Environment. Society, Integration, Education, 4, 24-34.
• CEDEFOP. (2016). Future skill needs in Europe: critical labour force trends. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Cedefop research paper; No.59.
• Coe, R.J. (2017). The nature of educational research. In: R. Coe, M. Waring, L.V. Hedges, & J. Arthur (Eds.). Research Methods & Methodologies in Education (pp. 5-14). London: SAGE.
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi.
• Dolak, F., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2013). Design Thinking and Design Science Research. Positioning Paper DESRIST 2013. Institute of Information Management, University of St.Gallen, HSG/IWI, 1-11.
• Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), November, 521-532.
• enGauge 21st century skills. (2003). Literacy in the Digital Age. Retrieved from http://pict.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf
• European Commission. (n.d.). Education and Training. EU Policy in the field of adult learning. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/eu-policy-in-the-field-of-adult-learning_en
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
• Gehtmane-Hofmane, I. (2018). Equine assisted learning: symbolic value of horse as underlying pattern in human thinking. Society, Integration, Education, 5, 81-86.
• Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301-320.
• Illeris, K. (2004). Adult education and adult learning. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
• Illeris, K. (2007). How We Learn. London, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
• Johansson, U., & Woodilla, J. (2009). Towards an epistemological merger of design thinking. The 8th European Academy of Design Conference. 1-3 April 2009, the Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland.
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Ҫetinkaya, M. (2013). Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), June, 121-146.
• Katalnikova, S. (2018). Knowledge worker as a user of intelligent collaborative educational system. Society, Integration, Education, 5, 315-326.
• Knowles, M.S. (1984). Andragogy in action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Kraus, A. (2016). Perspectives on Performativity: Pedagogical Knowledge in Teacher Education. Münster: Waxmann.
• Laborda, J.G. (2011). Revisiting Materials for Teaching Languages for Specific Purposes. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 17(1), 102-112.
• Laborda, J.G. (2009). Using webquests for oral communication English as a foreign language for Tourism Studies. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 258-270.
• Leifer, L.J., & Steinert, M. (2011). Dancing with ambiguity: Causality behavior, design thinking, and triple-loop-learning. Information Knowledge Systems Management, 10, 151-173.
• Liepa, D., & Špona, A. (2012). Pedagogical Principles of Foreign Language Studies. Society, Integration, Education, 1, 331-341.
• Long, H.B. (2002). Teaching for learning. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.
• Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual Education & Content and Language Integrated Learning. Paris: International Association for Cross-cultural Communication, Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua), University of Sorbonne.
• Mulder, M. (2016). ASEM conference “21st century skills”, October 2016. Retrieved from http://asemlllhub.org/fileadmin/www.asem.au.dk/CPH_Workshop_speakers/Presenation_Martin_Mulder.pdf
• Nunan, D. (1991). The Learner-Centred Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• OECD. (2018). Education 2030: The Future of Education and Skills. OECD Learning Framework. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
• Pätzold, H. (2011). Learning and Teaching in Adult Education. Contemporary Theories. Opladen & Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
• Rogers, A. (1996). Teaching Adults. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
• Rothwell, W.J. (2008). Adult Learning Basics. Alexandria, Virginia: ASTD Press.
• Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. NY: Basic Books.
• Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: towards a new design for teaching in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended Learning. Using Technology in and beyond the Language Classroom. Oxford: Macmillan.
• Stone, G., & Ineson, E. (2015). Introduction. In: E. Ineson, M. Smith, & V. Nita (Eds.), International Case Studies for Hospitality, Tourism and Event Management Students and Trainees, 6, (xv-xvi). Iasi: Tehnopress.
• Tesone, D., & Ricci, P. (2006). Toward a definition of entry-level job competencies: Hospitality manager perspectives. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 7, 65-80.
• Thomas, G. (2009). How to do Your Research Project. London: SAGE.
• Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
• Wagner, T. (2008). The Global Achievement Gap. NY: Basic Books.
• Walker, R. (2017). Naturalistic Research. In: R. Coe, M. Waring, L.V. Hedges, & J. Arthur (Eds.). Research Methods & Methodologies in Education (pp. 78-84). London: SAGE.
• Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 411-419. DOI: 10.1080/14703290802377307
• Widdowson, H.G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Williams, B. (2018). Mommy's little cyborg: Meet Generation Alpha. Bizcommunity, 11.05.2018. Retrieved from https://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/347/176959.html

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs20192.151.169