University-organised summer schools as cases of hybrid education

• Authors: AGNĖ PODERYTĖ
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Aim. The aim of is article is to discuss how summer schools can be approached as instances of hybrid education and how this can help to address the complex needs of their participants living in a culturally and technologically intertwined world. Methodology. This paper analyses the theoretical framework of hybrid education, its manifestations in summer schools and since it needs contextualisation, how it works in a specific case of Baltic Summer University organised by Vytautas Magnus University (Kaunas, Lithuania). Research and conclusion. To reach their target audience, summer schools combine academic content, and the elements of business and entertainment. This results in a separate mode of education with new possibilities and scope, however poses a paradox: while the adoption of business and entertainment practices puts summer schools somewhat outside the realm of the traditional university practices, it makes higher education more approachable and able to react to the fast-changing reality. Baltic Summer University fits the pattern established and as such, could benefit from a more active engagement of this theoretical approach and the opportunities it offers.   Originality. While summer schools are not a particularly new phenomenon, recently this field has witnessed a great expansion in both the supply of programmes and interest from students. The nature of these programmes and sudden interest in them remains under the radar of more extensive in-depth studies, which would actually help to harness its full potential.

Keywords

EN

summer school; short-term studies abroad; hybrid education; hybrid pedagogy

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 211-223

Dates

published

2020-09-11

Contributors

author

AGNĖ PODERYTĖ

• International Cooperation Department, Vytautas Magnus University V. Putvinskio g. 23, Kaunas, Lithuania

References

• Angus, T., Cook, I., & Evans J. (2001). A Manifesto for Cyborg Pedagogy?
• International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(2), 195-201.
• Bhabha, B. (2001). The Postcolonial and the Postmodern. In Colby R. Lawrence (Ed.) Symposia: Readings in Philosophy Paperback. Pearson Custom Publishing.
• Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
• Garšvė, L., & Mažeikienė, N. (2019). Being In-Between and Nowhere: A Hermeneutic Approach to Negotiating Transcultural and Third Space Identities. In: G. von Carlsburg Ed.), Transkulturelle Perspektiven in der Bildung [Transcultural Perspectives in Education]. Berlin: Peter Lang GmbH, 2019.
• Haraway, D. J. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge. ISBN 0415903866. https://web.archive.org/web/20120214194015/http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPS/Haraway/CyborgManifesto.html
• Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: J. Agnew, D. Livingstone and A. Rogers (Eds.) Human Geography, an Essential Anthology (pp. 108–28). Oxford: Blackwell https://msu.edu/~kg/874/Haraway_1988__Situated_Knowledges.pdf
• Kairė, S. (2018). Mes vienoje valtyje, bet aš vis tiek iš kitos kultūros: išgyvenimai mokantis daugiakultūrėse grupėse mobilumo metu [We are one the same boat, yet I am from another culture: the lived experiences of learning in group during mobility] (Doctoral thesis). Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas.
• Kenway, J. & Fitzclarence, L. (1999). Designing generations: Hybridising entertainment, advertising and education. Entertainment, advertising and education. Australian Journal of Education, 43(3), 300–316.
• Kincheloe, J. & Steinberg, S. (Eds.). (1997). Kinder-culture: The corporate construction of childhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Kleinman, D. L., Feinstein W., Downey, G. D., Peterson, S. & Fukada, Ch. (2018). Hybrid Experiments in Higher Education: General Trends and Local Factors at the Academic–Business Boundary. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(3), 540–569.
• Lakkala, M., Ilomäki, L., Mikkonen, P., Muukkonen, H., & Toom, A. (2018). Evaluating the pedagogical quality of international summer courses in a university program. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 7(2). 89–104.
• Owens, T. R. & Wang. Ch. (1996). Community-Based Learning: A Foundation for Meaningful Educational Reform. Service Learning, General.Paper 37. http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceslgen/37
• Parsons J. B., Kelly J. & Harding K. J. (2011). Post-Colonial Theory and Action Research. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(2), 1-6.
• Pedersen, A. Y., Nørgaard, R. T., & Köppe, C. (2018). Patterns of Inclusion: Fostering Digital Citizenship through Hybrid Education. Educational Technology & Society, 21 (1), 225–236. ISSN 1436-4522 (online) and 1176-3647 (print).
• Stommel, J. (2012). Hybridity, pt. 2: What is hybrid pedagogy? Retrieved from
• http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/hybridity-pt-2-what-is-hybrid-pedagogy/
• Stommel, J., & Rorabaugh, P. (2012). Hybridity, pt. 3: What does hybrid pedagogy do? Retrieved from
• http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/hybridity-pt-3-what-does-hybrid-pedagogy-do/
• Varkonyi, I. (2012). Hybrid Education: Combining the Benefits of Face-to-Face Learning with Online Distance Learning! Defence Transportation Journal, 68 (1), 22–23, 28.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs2020.2.211.223