Learning Continuity during COVID-19 Pandemic using the Virtual Classroom – A Cross-border experimental Multi Case Approach

• Authors: Khandakar Kamrul Hasan , Debarshi Mukherjee , Mahasweta Saha
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Aim. The global pandemic of the COVID-19 outbreak and the subsequent nationwide lockdown have put the endeavours of both academicians and students to the test. The disruptions are even visible in andragogical approaches across higher education institutions both nationally and internationally. Two government-funded universities in India and Bangladesh have decided to explore avenues to switch to an alternative e-platform overcoming the challenges of traditional classroom teaching. The business management faculties of both universities exercise blended learning modules using a design thinking approach. Methods. This exploratory case study involves university students and teachers reflecting the knowledge delivery mechanism in a collaborative online workspace called Virtual Classroom. The authors have adopted the case method to identify evidence-based practices to improve learning gain. This case is motivated by the profound idea of learning continuity where the agenda of teaching-learning should remain status quo as much as possible, even under the constrained situation. Results and Conclusion. This study confirms that the use of curriculum-based blended learning modules based on a design thinking approach is gaining momentum to offer courses in which videoconferencing is a useful tool, as an addition to present methods of teaching inside the classroom, to strengthen learning and to inspire students to practice learning. Acceptance of technology has made learning accessible and pervasive, bridging the digital divide. Originality. It is a pioneering effort to measure the effectiveness of the online learning of two public-funded universities across borders with similar demographics and challenges. This case makes an original contribution through its observation that even the traditional and public-funded universities erstwhile functioning through purely offline mode are gradually switching to online mode. This case also highlights the imminent need for policymakers to augment and integrate blended learning tools with design thinking approaches for tertiary education to reduce the intermittent use of technology, thereby assuring higher learning gain for the students.

Keywords

EN

Virtual Classroom; e-Learning; Blended Learning; Design Thinking; Learning Gain

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 335-354

Dates

published

2021-06-17

Contributors

author

Khandakar Kamrul Hasan

• Department of Business Management, Tripura University (A Central University), Suryamani Nagar, Agartala, Tripura 799022, India.

author

Debarshi Mukherjee

• Associate Professor and Head, Department of Business Management, Tripura University (A Central University), India

author

Mahasweta Saha

• Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Tripura University (A Central University), India

References

• Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group.1-45. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/grade-change-2013
• Barber, M., Donnelly, K., Rizvi, S., &Summers, L. (2013). An avalanche is coming: Higher education and the revolution ahead. Institute for Public Policy Research, London, UK. Retrieved from: http://www.ippr.org/publication/55/10432/anavalanche-iscoming-higher-education-and-the-revolution-ahead
• Bates, A. (2005). Technology, e-learning, and distance education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
• Bower, M. (2006). Virtual classroom pedagogy.ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 148–152.https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121390
• Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag London.
• Dey, A. K. (2007).A Lean approach to Improve Course Curriculum of MBA.Business Perspective, 9(2), 109–128.
• Dong, A. (2015). Design 3 innovation: Perspective or evidence-based practices. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 3(3–4), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2014.943294
• Dorst, K. (2011). The core of “design thinking” and its application.Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
• Dreamson, N. (2017). Online Collaboration in Design Education: an Experiment in Real-Time Manipulation of Prototypes and Communication. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 36(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12079
• Educational Benefits of Online Learning.(n.d.). Retrieved from https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/teachingLibrary/Technology/online%20%20learning.pdf
• Edwards, F. R. (2018). the Relationship Between College Student Attitudes Towards Online Learning Based on Reading Self-Efficacy, Ethnicity, and Age. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2788&context=doctoral
• Gaikwad, A., &Randhir, V. S. (2016). E-Learning in India: Wheel of Change. International Journal of E-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 6(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.17706/ijeeee.2016.6.1.40-45
• Gillies, D. (2008).Student perspectives on videoconferencing in teacher education at a distance.Distance Education, 29(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802004878
• IDEO. (2013, April). Design Thinking for Educators. Retrieved from Design Thinking for Educators: https://designthinkingforeducators.com/
• Jonassen, D., & Reeves, T. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 694–719). New York: Macmillan.
• Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008).Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
• Kort, B., & Reilly, R. (1950).Evolving Educational Pedagogy in Developing Nations.Media, 1–8.
• Kruger-Ross, M. J., & Waters, R. D. (2013). Predicting online learning success: Applying the situational theory of publics to the virtual classroom. Computers and Education, 61(1), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.015
• Lawson, T., & Comber, C. (2005).DfES Effective video conferencing in the classroom Summary report from six case studies.April 2005. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1611/
• Lone, Z. (2017).Impact of online education in India. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 7(7), 13590-13592.
• Luecke, R. (2003). Harvard business essentials: managing creativity and innovation. Harvard Business Press.
• Martin, F., & Parker, M. (2014). Use of Synchronous Virtual Classrooms: Why, Who, and How? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 192.
• Mascolo, M. (2009). Beyond Student-Centered and Teacher-Centered Pedagogy: Teaching and Learning as Guided Participation. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 3–27.
• Matthews, J., & Wrigley, C. (2017).Design and Design Thinking in Business and Management Higher Education.Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.294
• Moore, M. G. (2016). Editorial : Three types of interaction Editorial : Three Types of Interaction. 3647(October).https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
• Mostofa, S. M., Othman, R., Mukherjee, D., & Hasan, K. K. (n.d.).-RxuqdoRi (Gxfdwlrq&XowxuhDqg 6Rflhw 1R B 281. 281–295.
• Mukherjee, D. (2012a). Role of Communication Medium in Web Based Instructional Environment in Indian Management Education. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 21(1), 41-59.
• Mukherjee, D. (2012b). Blended Learning Model for Management Education in India – A Critical Review, 3D- IBA Journal of Management & Leadership, Vol.3.2, 88-93.
• Mukherjee, D. (2014). Factors of Management Education in India as Perceived by Learners and Providers: An Empirical Study. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 18(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262914527872
• Mukherjee, D. (2020). Indian Observer Post. Use of Digital Infrastructure Will Liberate Learning from the Boundaries of Classrooms. Retrieved from https:// indianobserverpost.com/News-Detail.aspx?Article=816
• Mukherjee, D., & Hasan, K. K. (2020). Challenges in Learning Continuity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Methodological and Thematic Review. South Asian Journal of Management, 27(3).56-78.
• Nunley, K. F. (2012). Have Schools Become Historical Museums? In: R. Sylwester, R & D. Moursund (Eds.), Creating an appropriate 21st century education (pp. 22-26). First Edition August 2012, Eugene, Oregon, USA: Information Age Education.
• Parker, M. A., & Martin, F. (2010). Synchronous virtual classrooms: Student perceptions from an online and blended education course. 2010 International Conference on Technology for Education, T4E 2010, 6(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2010.5550054
• Parkinson, M. (2018). 16 Strategies for Presenting Virtually. Retrieved from https://www.td.org/magazines/td-magazine/16-strategies-for-presenting-virtually
• Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Yovkova, B., &Aleksieva, L. (2018).Factors affecting students’ attitudes towards online learning - The case of Sofia University.AIP Conference Proceedings, 2048(December).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082043
• Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important ? Author ( s ): Rim Razzouk and Valerie Shute Source : Review of Educational Research , Vol . 82 , No . 3 ( September 2012 ), pp . 330-348 Published by : American Educational Research Association Stable URL. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.
• Rosenberg, M. J. (2005). Beyond e-learning: Approaches and technologies to enhance organizational knowledge, learning, and performance. John Wiley & Sons.
• Roussos, M., Johnson, A. E., Leigh, J., Vasilakis, C. A., Barnes, C. R., & Moher, T. G. (1997). NICE: Combining constructionism, narrative and collaboration in a virtual learning environment. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 31(3), 62-63. https://doi.org/10.1145/262171.262264
• Settles, B. (2012).Active learning. Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning, 6(1), 1-114.
• Shea, P., &Bidjerano, T. (2009).Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education.Computers and Education, 52(3), 543–553.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
• Songkram, N. (2015). E-learning System in Virtual Learning Environment to Develop Creative Thinking for Learners in Higher Education.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.600
• Suh, H. (2011). Collaborative Learning Models and Support Technologies in the Future Classroom.International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 5(1), 50–61. http://jaems.jp/contents/icomej/vol5/IJEMT5.50-61.pdf
• Wedig, T. (2010).Getting the most from classroom simulations: Strategies for maximizing learning outcomes.PS - Political Science and Politics, 43(3), 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651000079X
• Wrigley, C., &Straker, K. (2017). Design Thinking pedagogy: the Educational Design Ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385.https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs2021.1.335.345