Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 14 | 1 | 198-206

Article title

Correlation Between Time Perspective and Defense Mechanisms of Ukrainian Students During the War

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Aim. The article is aimed at proving the hypothesis that there are significant correlations between the defense mechanisms and the perception of time perspective in young people under the conditions of war. Methods. The study was held in May 2022 with the involvement of students who were relocated to the west of Ukraine from the eastern regions due to active hostilities. The following research methods were used: survey; psychological testing (Life Style Index, Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory); statistic analysis. Results. The study shows that the most common defense mechanisms of young people during the war are: repression, projection and displacement. At the same time, men use the defense mechanism of projection more often than women, and women are more prone to regression. It is determined that young people during the war are the least oriented towards the future. Also, there are very few who would perceive the past negatively. Conclusion. The data obtained during the research indicate the need to develop a program of psychological support for young people during the war, which would allow: to develop awareness of one's own experiences, defense mechanisms, ways of ecologically living through traumatic experience; to form a healthier attitude to time, which would include planning for the future at least for the short term and would contribute to increasing motivation for life and self-development.

Year

Volume

14

Issue

1

Pages

198-206

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Department of General and Medical Psychology, Bogomolets National Medical University, Tarasa Shevchenko Blvd, 13, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
  • Department of General and Medical Psychology, Bogomolets National Medical University, Tarasa Shevchenko Blvd, 13, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
  • Laboratory of General Psychology and History of Psychology Named after V.A. Romanets, Institute of Psychology Named after Kostyuk, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Pankivska vul., Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine

References

  • Belskaya, N. (2019). Research of diagnostic-psychometric opportunities of the R. Plutchik – H. Kellerman test “Life Style Index” (LSI) and its standardization on an example of Ukrainian high school students. Education and Development of Gifted Personality, 1(72), 20-29.
  • Benítez Camacho, E., Chávez-León, E., Ontiveros Uribe, M. P., Yunes Jiménez, A., & Náfate López, O. (2010). The levels of psychological functioning of personality and the mechanisms of defense. Salud mental, 33(6), 517-526.
  • Brannen, J., & Nilsen, A. (2002). Young people’s time perspectives: From youth to adulthood. Sociology, 36(3), 513–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036003002
  • Brun, C. (2015). Active waiting and changing hopes: Toward a time perspective on protracted displacement. Social Analysis, 59(1), 19-37.
  • Freud, S., Jones, E., Abraham, K., Ferenczi, S., & Simmel, E. (2022). Psycho-analysis and the war neuroses. DigiCat.
  • Knoll, M., Starrs, C. J., Perry, J. C. (2020). Rationalization (Defense Mechanism). In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1419
  • MacKenzie, M., & Foster, A. (2017). Masculinity nostalgia: How war and occupation inspire a yearning for gender order. Security Dialogue, 48(3), 206-223.
  • McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process. Guilford Press.
  • Moses, R. (2002). Unconscious Defense Mechanisms and Social Mechanisms Used in National and Political Conflicts. In J. Bunzl, & B. Beit-Hallahmi, (Eds.), Psychoanalysis, Identity, and Ideology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6324-9_5
  • Perry, J. L., Temple, E. C., Worrell, F. C., Zivkovic, U., Mello, Z. R., Musil, B., Cole, J. C. & McKay, M. T. (2020). Different version, similar result? A critical analysis of the multiplicity of shortened versions of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory. Sage Open, 10(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020923351.
  • Phan, H. P., Ngu, B. H., & McQueen, K. (2020). Future time perspective and the achievement of optimal best: Reflections, conceptualizations, and future directions for development. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1037.
  • Senyk, O. (2012). Adaptation of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZPTI) Questionnaire. Social psychology, 85, 153-168.
  • Zimbardo, P. G., Boyd, J. N. (1999) Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
18655383

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15503_jecs2023_1_198_206
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.