Psychological Analysis of Games Citizens Play

• Authors: Inha Petrovska

Abstracts

EN

Aim. The research aim is to present the most common games citizens play, a description of the main game theses and roles, psychological gains and rewards, paradigms of relations between the citizen and the state, which determine the emergence of the game, as well as opportunities to quit the game. Methods. To achieve the goal, a system of general scientific methods was used: analysis and generalisation of the main provisions of source studies regarding citizenship and the social role of the citizen, systematisation and generalisation of scientific provisions about games, as well as methodological provisions of Berne's transactional analysis. Results. 43% of Ukrainian citizens engage in "game" interaction with the state. The most common games citizens play are: "Persecution" ("The state oppresses me"), "Offended" ("If it wasn’t for this state…"), "Parasite" ("The state owes me and should keep me"), "Patriot" ("Only I love Ukraine, all others are traitors"), "Exemplary citizen" ("I perform my civic duties better than anyone"). Conclusions. Implementation of the role of a Citizen can lead to both constructive relations with the state and surrogate relations, which lead to various psychological games-manipulations. The developed system of psychological consulting practices for the prevention of civic identity "game" deformations can be used in the process of psychological support of civic identity formation in the development of complex training, and corrective activities, as well as in the educational process when creating programs of civic education and the development of civic competencies.

Keywords

EN

games; roles; transactional analysis; citizen; state

• Publisher: Fundacja Pro Scientia Publica
• Journal: Journal of Education Culture and Society
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 213-226

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Inha Petrovska

• Lviv Ivan Franko National University

• https://orcid.org/000000017544945X

References

• Berne, E. (1961). Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy: A systematic individual and social psychiatry. Grove Press.
• Berne, E. (1964). Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships. Grove Press.
• Berne, E. (1975). What do you say after you say hello? The psychology of human destiny. Bantam Books.
• Corey, G. (2013). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Wadsworth.
• Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday & Company.
• Goffman, E. (1970). Strategic Interaction. University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Hazratova, N. V. (2005). Psykholohiya vidnosyn osobystosti i derzhavy [Psychology of Relations between the Individual and the State]. [Doctoral dissertation, H. Kostyuk Institute of Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine]. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine. http://surl.li/hwbsp
• Hornostay, P. (2009). Psykholohiya rolovoyi samorealizatsiyi osobystosti [Psychology of role self-realization of the individual]. [Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine]. Electronic library of Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine. http://surl.li/hwbog
• Johnsson, R. (2011). Transactional Analysis Psychotherapy: Three Methods Describing a Transactional Analysis Group Therapy. [Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology]. Department of Psychology, Lund University. http://surl.li/hwbow
• Jung, C. G. (1958). The Undiscovered Self (Present and Future). Routledge
• Linton, R. (1963). The Study of Man: an introduction. D. Appleton-Century Company.
• Menéndez, A., & Olsen, E. (2020). The Concept and the Conception of Citizenship. In Challenging European Citizenship. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics (pp. 17-43). Palgrave Pivot. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22281-9_2
• Parsons, T. (1937). The Structure of Social Action. McGraw-Hill.
• Petrovska, I. (2022). Osoblyvosti psykholoho-konsultatyvnoyi roboty z problemamy hromadyanskoyi identychnosti [Peculiarities of Psychological Counseling with Civiс Identity Problems]. Psychological Journal, 8(1), 88-101. http://doi.org/10.31108/1.2022.8.1.6
• Petrovska, I. (2023). Typology of Civic Identity. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 11(2), 150-161. http://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2022.116324
• Sofinska, I. D. (2019). Filosofsko-pravova doktryna hromadyanstva [Philosophical-Legal Doctrine of Citizenship]. [Doctoral dissertation, Lviv Polytechnic National University]. Electronic archive of the Scientific-Technical Library of Lviv Polytechnic National University. http://surl.li/hwbil
• Tatenko, V. (1995). Subyekt psikhicheskoy aktivnosti: poisk novoy paradigmy [Subject of Psychic Activity: Search for a New Paradigm]. Psychological Journal, 16(3), 23-35.
• Tatenko, V. (2006). Subyektno-vchynkova paradyhma v suchasniy psykholohiyi [The Subject-Act Paradigm in Modern Psychology]. Human. Subject. Action: Philosophical and psychological studies (pp. 316-358). Lybid.
• Vos, J., & van Rijn, B. (2021) The Evidence-Based Conceptual Model of Transactional Analysis: A Focused Review of the Research Literature. Transactional Analysis Journal, 51(2), 160-201.
• Yang, Z., & Yang, B. (2015). Perspectives on Compensation and Legislation of Death due to Work Overload-Karoshi. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 4(108), 349-350.
• Żemigała, M. (2018). Zjawisko Śmierci z Przepracowania [The Phenomenon of Death from Overwork]. Studia i Prace WNEiZ US, 52(3), 177-186.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15503/jecs2023.2.213.226

Biblioteka Nauki

18733360