Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 14 | 2 | 57-77

Article title

Expansion as a Culture-Creating Principle of Post-Modernity: Semantic Contexts and Aesthetic Practices

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Aim. The purpose of the study is to analyse the structural aspects of expansion, which find expression in cultural metaphors and philosophical concepts, the transformation of the content of which is evidence of the emergence of new aesthetic practices. Methods. The research methodology involves the use of a systemic approach and such methods as analytical, comparative, axiological, and hermeneutic to understand the patterns of formation of paradigms of visual culture and contexts of expansion in postmodern culture. Results. The metaphor of glass during the 20th century loses its meaning as a source of the effects of refraction of reality in perception, the excessive complexity of which forms a tendency for simplifying and zeroing. The expansion becomes an important principle of cultural dynamics, extends to space and time, communication and identity in the world of the rapid circulation of information and its instant obsolescence. The patterns of expansion are observed in the processes of aestheticisation and aesthetic experience as the breaking out of form, perspective, perception and inclusion of the Self in the profound contexts of collective practices. Conclusions. Through mastering new sensual modalities in the photo, film reality, and the latest Internet technologies, there is an expansion of perception as an expansion of media. Therefore, at the level of identity the practices of focus, concentration, and slow contemplation gain importance. In the cultural aspect, the expansion enables a return to tradition in a new capacity.

Year

Volume

14

Issue

2

Pages

57-77

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Institute of International Relations, History and Philosophy, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, bulv. Tarasa Shevchenka 81, 18031, Cherkasy, Ukraine
  • Institute of International Relations, History and Philosophy, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, bulv. Tarasa Shevchenka 81, 18031, Cherkasy, Ukraine
author
  • Communal Institution «Regional Art Museum», Cherkasy Regional Council, vul. Khreshchatyk 259, 18001, Cherkasy, Ukraine
  • Institute of Pedagogical Education, Social Work and Art, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, vul. Ostafia Dashkovycha 24, 18001, Cherkasy, Ukraine
  • Institute of International Relations, History and Philosophy, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, bulv. Tarasa Shevchenka 81, 18031, Cherkasy, Ukraine
  • Institute of International Relations, History and Philosophy, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, bulv. Tarasa Shevchenka 81, 18031, Cherkasy, Ukraine

References

  • Abramson, S. (2017). What is Metamodernism? HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-is-metamodernism_b_586e7075e4b0a5e600a788cd
  • Arnheim, R. (2004). Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan Press.
  • Benjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations: essays and reflections. Schocken Books.
  • Berleant, A. (2005). Aesthetics and environment: variations on a theme. Ashgate Publishing.
  • Bondarevska, І., Gerasymchuk, V., Levchuk, L., Оnishchenko, О., Pavlova, О., Panchenko, V., & Shulga, R. (2009). Estetyka v Ukraini: siogodennia i maibutnie [Aesthetics in Ukraine: present and future]. Filosofska dumka, 6, 21-38. http://journal.philosophy.ua/sites/default/files/filefield_paths/2009_6-22-39.pdf
  • Bourriaud, N. (2022). Inclusions. Aesthetics of the capitalocene. Sternberg Press.
  • Certeau, M. de. (2011). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
  • Debord, G. (1992). La société du spectacle [The society of the spectacle]. Gallimard.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia. Continuum.
  • Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs. Northwestern University Press.
  • Dumitrescu, А. (2016). What is metamodernism and why bother? Meditations on metamodernism as a period term and as a mode. Electronic Book Review. https://electronicbookreview.com/essay/what-is-metamodernism-and-why-bother-meditations-on-metamodernism-as-a-period-term-and-as-a-mode/
  • Eco, U. (1994). Apocalypse postponed. Indiana University Press.
  • Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Harvard University Press.
  • Eshelman, R. (2008). Performatism or the end of postmodernism. The Davies Group Publishers.
  • Freinacht, H. (2017). The listening society: a metamodern guide to politics, book one (Metamodern Guides). Metamoderna ApS.
  • Golovina, N. (2016). Estetychna osvita v umovah postkultury [Aesthetic education in the post-culture]. Filosofski goryzonty, 35, 97-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.57515
  • Harris, M. D., & Okediji, M. (1999). Transatlantic dialogue: Contemporary art in and out of Africa. Ackland Art Museum, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  • Hassan, I. (1982). The dismemberment of Orpheus: toward a postmodern literature. University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Hutcheon, L. (1988). A poetics of postmodernism: history, theory, fiction. Routledge.
  • Hutcheon, L. (2000). A theory of parody: the teachings of twentieth-century art forms. University of Illinois Press.
  • Hutcheon, L. (2002). The politics of postmodernism. Routledge.
  • Jameson, F. (1992). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Duke University Press.
  • Jameson, F. (2007). Signatures of the visible. With an introduction by the author. Routledge.
  • Jenkins, H. (2009). The revenge of the origami unicorn: seven principles of transmedia storytelling. http://henryjenkins.org/2009/12/the_revenge_of_the_origami_uni.html
  • Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press.
  • Jencks, Ch. (1987). Post modernism: The new classicism in art and architecture. Academy Editions.
  • Kroker, A., & Cook, D. (1986). The postmodern scene. Excremental culture and hyper-aesthetics. St. Martin’s Press.
  • Lehenkyi, Yu. (1995). Kulturolohiia zobrazhennia. Dosvid kompozytsiinoho syntezu [Culturology of the image. Experience of compositional synthesis]. DALPU.
  • Lipovetsky, G. (1994). The empire of fashion: dressing modern democracy. Princeton University Press.
  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester University Press.
  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1997). Postmodern fables. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Mandelbrot, B. (2002). Fraktalnaia geometria prirody [Fractal geometry of nature]. Institut Kompiuternyh Issledovanii.
  • McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. The MIT Press.
  • Nealon, J. T. (2012). Post-postmodernism; or, the cultural logic of just-in-time capitalism. Stanford University Press.
  • Onishchenko, О. (2008). Khudozhnia tvorchist: Proekt neklasychnoi estetyky [Artistic creativity: A project of non-classical aesthetics]. Institute for Cultural Research of the National Academy of Arts of Ukraine.
  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (2019). The dehumanisation of art and other essays on art, culture, and literature. Princeton University Press.
  • Pasichnyk, І. (2014). Pervisne znachenia estetyky Estetyka Baumgartena [The original meaning of aesthetics. Baumgarten's aesthetics]. Filosofska dumka, 3, 80-93. http://journal.philosophy.ua/article/nid6587
  • Pavlova, O. (2022). Visualna antropologia: etapy stanovlennia ta bazovi elementy analizu [Visual anthropology: formation stages and basic elements of analysis]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Istoria i teoria, 5, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-8907.2022.5.47-53
  • Petrova, I. (2020). Metamodernism as a concept of cultural studies. Pytannia kulturolohii, 36, 14-23. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1311.36.2020.221039
  • Rudrum, D., & Stavris, N. (Eds.). (2015). Supplanting the postmodern. An anthology of writings on the arts and culture of the early 21st century. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Sabadash, Yu. (2012). Umberto Eko: humanism kulturotvorchykh idei [Umberto Eco: humanism of cultural ideas]. NAKKKiM.
  • Shabanova, Yu. (2019). Ostsyliatsiia yak vymir filosofii metamodernu [Osillation as Determination of Metamodern Philosophy]. Epistemolohichni doslidzhennia v filosofii, sotsialnykh i politychnykh naukakh, 2(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.15421/341920
  • Shevchuk, K. (2019). The concept of the “contemporary art” and the “aesthetic situation” in Polish aesthetics. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Filosofski nauky, 1(85), 95-102. http://philosophy.visnyk.zu.edu.ua/article/view/PhilosophicalSciences.1%2885%29.2019.95-102/190085
  • Storm, J. J. (2021). Metamodernism: The future of theory. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. William Morrow and Company.
  • Touraine, A. (1992). Critique de la modernité [Critique of modernity]. Fayard.
  • Turner, L. (2011). The Metamodernist Manifesto. http://www.metamodernism.org/
  • Vattimo, G. (1991). The end of modernity: Nihilism and hermeneutics in postmodern culture. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Vermeulen, T., & van den Akker, R. (2015). Misunderstandings and clarifications. Notes on Metamodernism. https://www.metamodernism.com/2015/06/03/misunderstandings-and-clarifications/
  • Virilio, P. (1986). Speed and politics: An essay on dromology. Semiotext(e).
  • Welsch, W. (1997). Undoing aesthetics. Thousand Oaks; Sage Publications.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
18752531

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15503_jecs2023_2_57_77
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.