Użyteczność metod logiki nieformalnej w badaniu argumentów w dyskusjach między teistami a ateistami

• Authors: Kamil Trombik
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

This paper argues that methods used in informal logic (sometimes called CriticalThinking) could be helpful in examining the arguments in discussionsbetween theists and atheists. Application of the techniques of informal logiccould reveal the substantive value of many commonly shared views about theism(and theists) and atheism (and atheists). The utility of applying informallogic methods has illustrated by several examples.

Keywords

PL

argumentation; informal logic; atheism; theism; critical thinking

EN

argumentation; informal logic; atheism; theism; critical thinking

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie
• Journal: Semina Scientiarum
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 16

Dates

published

2017

online

2018-07-31

Contributors

author

Kamil Trombik

Identifiers

DOI

10.15633/ss.2495