The electoral situation as a chronotope

• Authors: Pavlo Hnatenko

Abstracts

EN

This article explores the phenomenon of elections as a political chronotope, a spatio-temporal realm where the mechanisms of democracy unfold. Its aim is to elucidate the unique socio-political nature of elections. The author establishes that the spatial and temporal characteristics define the format and regulations governing electoral interactions. The term «chronotope» is understood as an interdisciplinary concept that captures the essential connections between temporal and spatial features within a specific order of phenomena. Although extensive research has focused on the social, technical, and psychological aspects of expressing one›s will, the ontology of elections, which encompasses the comprehension of the «unity of time and place of action» and the involvement of political actors in the electoral scenario, has been largely overlooked. Additionally, this study concentrates on the concept of the electoral situation, which delineates the synchronous and diachronic connections wherein citizens’ political choices are positioned, realized, and interpreted. The notion of the electoral situation can be correlated with the term «political landscape», which is only partially related to actual geography but predominantly pertains to the comprehensive conditions of an electoral competition (the coordinate system) and the participants involved in this process. The article’s author illustrates how the electoral situation constructs synchronous and diachronic connections at various levels of political interaction. Notably, these connections are facilitated by political mythologems, which serve as unifying and integrative factors within the electoral chronotope. By examining these mythologems, the author highlights their role in shaping the narrative and symbolism surrounding elections, ultimately influencing the dynamics and outcomes of the electoral process. Overall, this article delves into the intricate relationship between elections and the spatio-temporal framework in which they occur. By emphasizing the significance of the electoral situation and its connection to the broader political landscape, the author sheds light on the multifaceted nature of electoral processes, enriching our understanding of democracy’s fundamental mechanisms.

Keywords

EN

political landscape; political actor; actor-network theory; frame; frame analysis; сhronotope; elections; electoral situation

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Copernicus Political and Legal Studies
• Year: 2023
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 74-80

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Pavlo Hnatenko

• V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

• https://orcid.org/000000028904870X

References

• Arrow, K.J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values.
• Bentley, A. (1908). The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures.
• Bourdieu, P. (1979). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Harvard University Press.
• Collins Dictionary. Social situation. Retrieved from: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/social-situations.
• Condorcet, N. (1785). Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain [Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions] [in French].
• Dahl, R.A. (1957). Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker. Journal of Public Law, 6, pp. 279–295.
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard University Press.
• Goffman, E. (1959). Presenting yourself to others in everyday life. Anchor.
• Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a Rational Society. J. J. Shapiro (trans.). Boston: Beacon. [German, 1968a, 1969]).
• Hibbling, J.R, Alford, J.R. (1981). The Electoral Impact of Economic Conditions: Who Is Held Responsible? American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), pp. 423–439. DOI: 10.2307/2110812.
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press.
• Manning, Ph. (1992). Erving Goffman and modern sociology. Polity Press.
• Pinch, T. (2010). The Invisible Technologies of Goffman’s Sociology: From the Merry-Go-Round to the Internet. Technology and Culture, 51(2), pp. 409–424.
• Schumpeter, J. (1976). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Allen and Unwin.
• Truman, D.B. (1951). The Governmental Рrocess. Political Interests and Public Opinion.
• Ukraina na starti vyboriv do Verkhovnoi Rady [Ukraine at the start of elections to the Verkhovna Rada]. Socis. Retrieved from: http://socis.kiev.ua/ua/2019-06/ [in Ukrainian].
• Vyborchyi kodeks Ukrainy [Electoral code of Ukraine]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy № 7, № 8, № 9. Edition of 01.08.2021. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/396-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
• Yekhnich, A. (2008). Elektoralnyi prostir: poniattia, sutnist, struktura. [Electoral space: concept, essence, structure]. Viche. Retrieved from: http://veche.kiev.ua/journal/858/ [in Ukrainian].

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/CPLS.2023108

Biblioteka Nauki

16538511