Tug’o War: Vietnam’s Strategy for Great Powers in Southeast Asia

• Authors: Barbara Kratiuk

Abstracts

EN

This paper will answer the question of the viability of Vietnam’s strategy for survival. How sustainable is the enmeshment and balancing strategy? Due to its geopolitical position, Vietnam has found itself on a precipice: almost all significant and regional powers find themselves seeking a partnership with Vietnam. Vietnam has also pursued these partnerships, hoping to stabilize and strengthen the state’s position. It is all the more important due to rising tensions in the South China Sea. Independence and survival are overreaching themes of Vietnamese foreign policy. The main strategy is for great and regional powers to balance each other out in the region, allowing Vietnam the greatest possible decision-making freedom. There is however a question of the viability of that balancing strategy. Certain strategic partnerships, like those with India, Japan, or the US, have been developed, but only to a degree, and their viability has yet to be tested. It is possible that this course of action, calculated to balance China’s influence in the region, might backfire in the end, returning the region to the Chinese sphere of influence as predicted by David Kang.

Keywords

EN

Vietnam; Southeast Asia; ASEAN; foreign relations; balancing strategy

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Azja-Pacyfik
• Year: 2023
• Issue: XXVII
• Pages: 5-30

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Barbara Kratiuk

• University of Warsaw

• https://orcid.org/0000000288424419

References

• Achaya A. (2009). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. New York.
• Agarwala N. (2021). Maritime Sector as a Growth Engine for Vietnam: A Case Study. The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies, 8(2), 74–97.
• Aggarwal V.K., Govella K. (Eds.) (2013). Linking Trade and Security: evolving institutions and strategies in Asia, Europe and the United States. New York.
• Australian Strategic Policy Institute (2021). Japan, India and the Quad. An Informed and Independent Voice: ASPI, 2001–2021, 112–24.
• Ba A.D. (2003). China and ASEAN: Renavigating Relations for a 21st Century Asia. Asian Survey, 43(4).
• Baev P.K., Tonnesson S. (2015). Can Russia keep its special ties with Vietnam while moving closer and closer to China? International Area Studies Review, 18(3).
• Baruah D.M. (2020). Partnerships as a Central Pillar of India’s Indo-Pacific Strategy. India in the Indo-Pacific: New Delhi’s Theater of Opportunity. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
• Bateman S., Ho J. (Eds.) (2010). Southeast Asia and the Rise of Chinese and Indian Naval Power. New York.
• Beeson M. (Ed.) (2007). Bush and Asia: America’s evolving relations with East Asia. New York.
• Beeson M., Bellamy A.J. (Eds.) (2008). Securing Southeast Asia: the politics of security sector reform. New York.
• Beeson M. (2016). Can ASEAN Cope with China? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, January.
• Bercovitch J., Oishi M. (2012). International Conflict in the Asia-Pacific: patterns, consequences and management. New York.
• Bisley N. (2009). The East Asia Summit and ASEAN: Potential and Problems. Contemporary Southeast Asia.
• Bryant T., Jessup B. (2005). Fragmented Pragmatism: the conclusion and adoption of international treaties in Vietnam. In J. Gillespie, P. Nicholson (Eds.), Asian Socialism and Legal Change. ANU Press.
• Chakraborti T. (2012). India and the Indochina States in Emerging Global Politics: Challenges and opportunities. Policy Brief, 4, University of Calcutta.
• Chapman N. (2017). Mechanisms of Vietnam’s Multidirectional Foreign Policy. Journal of Contemporary Southeast Asian Studies, 36(2).
• Cheng J.Y.S. (2011). Sino-Vietnamese Relations in the Early Twenty-first Century: Economics in Command? Asian Survey, 51(2).
• Chung J.H. (2009). East Asia Responds to the Rise of China: Patterns and Variations. Pacific Affairs, 82(4).
• Ciorciari J.D. (2010). The Limits of Alignment: Southeast Asia and the Great Powers since 1975. Washington DC.
• Clinton H. (2011). America’s Pacific Century. Foreign Policy, 11 October 2011. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century
• Cronin R. A New US-ASEAN Trade Track http://www.stimson.org/essays/anew-us-asean-trade-tack/
• Delamotte G. (2012). Japan’s Foreign Policy beyond Short-term Politics. Asia-Pacific Review, 19(2).
• Do Thi T. (2013). Locating Vietnam-Japan’s Strategic Partnership in the Changing East Asian Political Landscape. JIIA Fellow Report.
• Economic Times. Wary of China, Vietnam bonds with India in Indo-Pacific. 23 April 2023. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/wary-of-china-vietnam-bonds-with-india-in-indo-pacific-waters/articleshow/99413365.cms
• Emmerson D.K. (2017). Mapping ASEAN’s Futures. Contemporary Southeast Asia.
• Flournoy M., Davidson J. (2013). Obama’s new Global Posture. Foreign Affairs, 91(4).
• Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks and answers to questions at the meeting in Mongolia’s Foreign Ministry. Ulan-Bator, 14 April 2016. http://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/2233937
• Gill B. (2017). Pivotal Days: US-Asia-Pacific Alliances in the Early Stages of the Trump Administration. Chatham House Research Paper, June.
• Goh E. (2007). Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia. International Security, 32(3).
• Goh E. (2014). How Japan matters in the evolving East Asian security order. International Affairs, 87(4).
• Goh E. (2014). The Modes of China’s Influence Cases from Southeast Asia. Asian Survey, 54(5).
• Goh E. (2013). The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy and Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford.
• Goodman M.P., Arasasingham A. (2022). Regional Perspectives on the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
• Gordon B.K. (2013). Trading Up in Asia. Foreign Affairs, 91(4).
• Guan Cheng A. (1998). Vietnam-China Relations since the End of the Cold War. Asian Survey, 38(12).
• Gubin A. (2015). Military Multipolarity in the South China Sea. Russian International Affairs Council.
• Hang Thi To P. (2022). How RCEP shapes Vietnam’s supply chains. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 7 December 2022. https://www.kas.de/en/web/vietnam/single-title/-/content/how-the-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnershiprcep-shapes-supply-chains-in-vietnam
• Herspring D.R. (2006). Russian-Asian Relations. In S.K. Wegren (Ed.), Russia’s Policy Challenges: Security, Stability and Development. New York.
• Hiep Hong L. (2015). Vietnam’s Alliance Politics in the South China Sea. ISEAS Publishing.
• Hiep Hong L. (2013). Vietnam’s Hedging Strategy against China since Normalization. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 35(3).
• Hung Manh N. (2016). New Context of Vietnam’s National Security Challenges. ISEAS Publishing.
• Japan Times. TPP 11 forge ahead with renamed trade pact after close call. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/11/11/business/economy-business/eleven-trade-ministers-reach-deal-tpp-without-u-s/#.Wpw_Q3wiHX4
• Joint Press Statement TPP Ministerial Meeting Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam. http://www.ustr.gov/Joint-Press-Statement-TPP-Ministerial-Brunei 5 October 2013
• Joint statement by Vietnam, US after PM Phuc’s White House visit. https://tuoitrenews.vn/politics/41258/joint-statement-by-vietnam-us-after-pm-phucsvisit-to-white-house
• Kaplan R. (2010). China’s Grand Map: How far will Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea? Foreign Affairs, 89(3).
• Kapoor N. (2021). Russia’s Conduct on the South China Sea. Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/research/russias-conduct-in-thesouth-china-sea/
• Katada S. (2002). Japan and Asian Monetary Regionalization: Cultivating a New Regional Leadership after the Asian Financial Crisis. Geopolitics, 7(1).
• Keynote Address by H.E. Mr. Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister of Japan at the 13th IISS Asian Security Summit ‘Shangri-La Dialogue’. http://www.mofa.go.jp/fp/nsp/page18e_000087.html
• Kitaoka S. (2015). Japan seventy Years after World War II: From a Challenger to a Supporter of the International Order. Asia-Pacific Review, 22(2).
• Koga K. (2011). The US and East Asian Regional Security Architecture: Building a Regional Security Nexus on Hub-and-Spoke. Asian Perspective, 35.
• Lee J. (2015). Strategic Possibilities and Limitations for Abe’s Japan in Southeast Asia. ISEAS.
• Levitt S. (2005). The Lack of Security Cooperation between Southeast Asia and Japan: Yen Yes, Pax Nippon No. Asian Survey, 45(2).
• Liu R., Sun X. (2015). Regime security first: explaining Vietnam’s security policies towards the United States and China. The Pacific Review, 28(5).
• Luong Hien D.T. (2009). Vietnam–Japan Relations in the Context of Building an East Asian Community. Asia Pacific Review, 16(1).
• Manh Hung N. (2016). New Context of Vietnam’s National Security Challenges. ISEAS.
• Martynova E.S. (2014). Strengthening of Cooperation between Russia and ASEAN: rhetoric or reality? Asian Politics and Policy, 6(3).
• Miguel de E. (2013). Japan and Southeast Asia: From the Fukuda Doctrine to Abe’s Five Principles. UNISCI Discussion Papers, 32.
• Military and Political Organ of the Central Military Commission (2015). Strengthening defence and security to firmly protect Homeland of Socialist Vietnam. National Defense Journal. Hanoi: Ministry of National Defense. http://tapchiqptd.vn/en/theory-and-practice/strengthening-defence-and-security-tofirmly-protect-homeland-of-socialist-vietnam/8189.html
• Minh Quang P. (2011). The East Asia Security Environment in the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century and the Adjustment in Vietnamese Foreign Policy. Asia-Pacific Review, 18(1).
• Nathan A., Scobell A. (2012). How China Sees America. Foreign Affairs, 91(5).
• Obama B. US to lift the arms embargo on Vietnam. https://nyti.ms/2ui4Bkp
• Pham Quang M. (2015). ASEAN’s Indispensable Role in Regional Construction. Asia-Pacific Review, 22(2).
• Reppert J. (2006). Russia’s Threat Perceptions. In S.K. Wegren (Ed.), Russia’s Policy Challenges: Security, Stability and Development. New York.
• Ross R. (2012). The Problem with the Asia Pivot. Foreign Affairs, 91(6).
• Rozman G., Togo K., Ferguson J.P. (2006). Russian Strategic Thought towards Asia. New York.
• Russian Foreign Policy Concept. http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/122186 accessed 10 February 2018
• Scott D. (2006). India’s ‘Grand Strategy’ for the Indian Ocean: Mahanian Visions. Asia-Pacific Review, 13(2).
• Singh B. (2010). The Evolution of Japan’s Security Role in Southeast Asia. The Round Table, 99(409).
• Singh D. (Ed.) (2007). Political and Security Dynamics of South and Southeast Asia. Singapore.
• Stern L.M. (2012). Building strategic relations with Vietnam. http://www.academia.edu/2073555/Lewis_M._Stern_National_Defense_University_Building_Strategic_Relations_with_Vietnam_Joint_Forces_Quarterly_April_2012_http_www.ndu.edu_press_building-strategic-relations-with-vietnam.html_accessed_July_2_2012_
• Tan A.T.H. (2011). Security Strategies in the Asia-Pacific: The United States ‘second front’ in Southeast Asia. New York.
• Taylor B. (2011) Asia’s century and the problem of Japan’s centrality. International Affairs, 87(4).
• Tessman B., Wolfe W. (2011). Great Powers and Strategic Hedging: The Case of Chinese Energy Security Strategy. International Studies Review, 13(2).
• Thayer C.A. (1994). Sino-Vietnamese Relations: The interplay of Ideology and National Interest. Asian Survey, 34(6).
• Thayer C.A. (2010). Vietnam and Rising China: the structural dynamics of mature asymmetry. Southeast Asian Affairs.
• Thayer C.A. (2016). Vietnam’s Proactive international integration: case studies in defense cooperation. Vietnamese National University Journal of Science, 32, 25–47.
• Thayer C.A. (2011). The Tyranny of Geography: Vietnamese Strategies to Constrain China in the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 33(3).
• Tow W. (2016). Bipolarity and the future of the security order in East Asia. ISEAS.
• Tran Bich T., Sato Y. (2018). Vietnam’s Post-Cold War Hedging Strategy: A changing mix of realist and liberal ingredients. Asian Politics and Policy, 10(1).
• Tran Thi P., Vysotkaya Guedes Viera A., Ferreira-Pereira L.C. (2013). Vietnam’s strategic hedging vis-à-vis China: the roles of the European Union and Russia. Brazilian Review of International Politics, 56(1).
• Trump D.J. A New National Security Strategy for a New Era. https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/new-national-security-strategy-new-era/
• Tsvetov A. (2016). After Crimea: Southeast Asia in Russia’s Foreign Policy Narrative. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 38(1).
• Tsvetov A. (2016). Can US-Vietnam ties reconciliation hurt Russia’s ties with Hanoi? Russian International Affairs Council.
• Tsvetov A. (2015). Vietnam’s Year of Free Trade. Russian International Affairs Council.
• Tsvetov A. (2016). Russia and ASEAN: in search of economic synergy and political consensus. Russian International Affairs Council.
• Tuteja A. (2013). India, Vietnam sign oil exploration pact. The Tribune, 13 October.
• Vietnam - Japan elevate relations to Extensive Strategic Partnership. http://moj.gov.vn/en/Pages/Coordination-of-International-Legal-Cooperation-Activit.aspx?ItemID=3165
• Vu Tung N. Vietnam’s Security Challenges: Hanoi’s New Approach to National Security and Implications to Defense and Foreign Policies. National Institute for Defense Studies.
• Vuving A.L. (2006). Strategy and Evolution of Vietnam’s China Policy: a changing mixture of pathways. Asian Survey, 46(6).
• Wang H.H., Wang S.S., Tzeng W.F. (2020). Between a Rock and a Hard Place: How Lesser Powers Respond to Competing Great Powers in the Asia-Pacific Region. Issues & Studies, 56(2). http://www.nids.go.jp/english/publication/joint_research/series5/series5.html
• Womack B. (2006). China and Vietnam: politics of asymmetry. Cambridge University Press.
• Womack B. (2003). China and Southeast Asia: Asymmetry, Leadership and Normalcy. Pacific Affairs, 76(4).
• Womack B. (2000). International Relationship at the Border of China and Vietnam: An Introduction. Asian Survey, 40(6).
• Yeo H.K., Cutler W. (2003). Strengthening Regional Supply Chain Resiliency Through the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF). Asia Society.
• Zhang Y. (2014). Multilateral means for bilateral ends: Japan, regionalism and China-Japan-US trilateral dynamism. The Pacific Review, 27(1).
• Zhang X. (2015). China’s Perceptions of and Responses to Abe’s Foreign Policy. Asian Perspective, 39(3).

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ap2023.1.01

Biblioteka Nauki

31343009