Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 44 | 151-163

Article title

Flexicurity Towards Responsibility for the Labour Market Changes

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Koncepcja flexicurity stanowiła kluczową kwestię w debatach i działalności instytucji Unii Europejskiej z zakresu zatrudnienia i polityki społecznej przez ostatnie dwie dekady. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza idei flexicurity w kontekście odpowiedzialności za rozwój rynku pracy. Odpowiedzialność jest przerzucana na państwo i pracowników, podczas gdy pracodawcy są zwolnieni z odpowiedzialności za koszty społeczne związane z fluktuacjami cyklu koniunkturalnego. Artykuł zawiera analizę procesu uelastyczniania rynku pracy i jego kompensacji poprzez system zabezpieczenia, krytycznego podejścia do modeli flexicurity oraz wyzwań związanych z implementacją tej koncepcji.
EN
The concept of flexicurity has been a key issue in the discussions and activities of institutions of the European Union in the field of employment and social policy for about two decades. The purpose of this article is to analyze the idea of flexicurity in the context of responsibility for development of the labour market. The responsibility is mostly transferred to the state and employees, while the employers are exempt from accountability for the social costs associated with the fluctuations in the economic cycle. The article contains the analysis of the labour market flexibilisation process and its compensation with the security system, critical approach to flexicurity models and challenges associated with the implementation of this concept.

Year

Volume

44

Pages

151-163

Physical description

Dates

published
2014

Contributors

  • Poznań University of Life Sciences

References

  • Auer P. (2010). What’s in a name? The rise (and fall?) of flexicurity. “Journal of Industrial Relations” 52.
  • Begg D. (2011). Sharing Social Responsibility in Shaping the Future: A Trade Union Perspective. [in:] Sharing Responsibility in Shaping the Future. B. Reynolds, S. Healy (eds.). Dublin: Social Justice Ireland. [online] http://www.socialjustice.ie/sites/default/files/file/Social%20Policy%20Conference/2011-09-14%20%20Sharing%20Responsibility%20in%20Shaping%20the%20Future%20full%20boo.pdf; [accessed 14.03.2014].
  • Bredgaard T., Larsen F. (2010). External and internal flexicurity. Copenhagen: Centre for Labour Market Research (CARMA) Department of Economics, Politics and Administration Aalborg University Denmark, IIRA European Congress.
  • European Commission. (1993). White Paper on growth, competitiveness, and employment: The challenges and ways forward into 21st century. COM(93) 700 final, Brussels. [online] http://europa.eu/documentation/official-docs/whitepapers/pdf/growth_wp_com_93_700_parts_a_b.pdf; [accessed 22.02.2014].
  • European Commission. (2007a). Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs Through Flexibility and Security. COM(2007) 359 final. Brussels. [online] http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/employment_strategy/flexicurity%20media/flexicuritypublication_2007_en.pdf; [accessed 22.02.2013].
  • European Commission. (2007b). European Expert Group on Flexicurity, Report. Flexicurity Pathways. Turning hurdles into stepping stones. COM(2007). Brussels. [online] ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=1519&langId=en; [accessed 11.03.2014].
  • European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020. Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. European Commission COM(2010). Brussels. [online] http://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/com-2010-2020-europe-2020; [accessed 14.04.2014].
  • Guardian Editorial. (2011) Howls of Anguish: Taxing the Rich, “Guardian”, August 26th.
  • Gilbert N., Van Voorhis R. (2001). Activating the unemployed: a comparative appraisal of work-oriented policies. “International Social Security Series”. London: Transaction Publishers.
  • Jepsen M., Serrano Pascual A. (2006). Unwrapping the European Social Model. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Jørgensen H. (2011). Danish ‘flexicurity’ in crisis or just stress-tested by the crisis? Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
  • Keune M. (2008). Flexicurity: a contested concept at the core of the European labour market debate? “Intereconomics” 43(2).
  • Klammer U. (2004). Flexicurity in a life-course perspective. “Transfer” 10(2).
  • Mandl I., Hurley J., Mascherini M., Storrie D. (2010). Extending flexicurity – The potential of short-time working schemes. ERM REPORT. Luxembourg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Pedersini R. (2008). Flexicurity and industrial relations. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
  • Philips K., Eamets R. (2007). Approaches to flexicurity: EU models. Luxemburg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Schmid G. (2014). Beyond Flexibility. Active securities for flexible employment relationships. [in:] Deconstructing Flexicurity and Developing Alternative Approaches. Towards New Concepts and Approaches for Employment and Social Policy. M. Keune, A. Serrano (eds.). New York: Routledge.
  • Sennett R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Sultana R.G. (2013). Flexibility and security? ‘Flexicurity’ and its implications for lifelong guidance. “British Journal of Guidance & Counselling” 41(2).
  • Tangian A. (2004). Liberal and trade-unionist concepts of flexicurity: Modelling in application to 16 European countries. Diskussionspapier nr 131. October. [online] http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_wsi_diskp_131.pdf; [accessed 29.04.2014].
  • Tangian A. (2008). Towards Consistent Principles of Flexicurity. WSI-Diskussionspapier nr 159. [online] http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_wsi_diskp_159_e.pdf; [accessed 13.01.2014].
  • Tangian A. (2009a). Towards computer-aided collective bargaining: Enhancing the trade unions position under flexicurity. WSI-Diskussionspapier nr 165, Düsseldorf. [online] http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_wsi_diskp_165_e.pdf; [accessed 20.04.2014].
  • Tangian A. (2009b). Negotiation model of flexicurity-relevant collective bargaining. [online] http://www.fafo.no/irec/papers/AndranikTangian.pdf; [accessed 17.04.2014].
  • Trading Economics (2014). Netherlands unemployment rate 2003 – 2014. [online] http://www.tradingeconomics.com/netherlands/unemployment-rate; [accessed 28.04.2014].
  • Van Oorschot W. (2001). Work, Welfare and Citizenship. Activation and Flexicurity Policies in the Netherlands, Aalborg University. [online] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.195.5365&rep=rep1&type=pdf; [accessed 05.04.2014].
  • Viebrock E., Clasen J. (2009) Flexicurity – a state-of-the-art review. Working Papers on the Reconciliation of Work and Welfare in Europe RECWOWE Publication. Edinburgh: Dissemination and Dialogue Centre.
  • Wilthagen T., Tros F. (2004). The concept of ‘flexicurity’: a new approach to regulating employment and labour markets. “Transfer” 10(2).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2021210

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15804_athena_2014_44_09
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.