Indywidualny kapitał społeczny i jego znaczenie dla dobrostanu emocjonalnego studentów w czasie pandemii COVID-19

• Authors: Jolanta Muszyńska , Szymon Cyprian Czupryński

Title variants

EN

The meaning of individual social capital for the emotional well-being of students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł prezentuje wyniki badań zrealizowanych w okresie pandemii COVID-19 w 2021 roku wśród studentów Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku. Celem badania było określenie znaczenia indywidualnego kapitału społecznego dla dobrostanu emocjonalnego studentów. Dobrostan emocjonalny został zdefiniowany jako globalna ocena jakości życia jednostki. Indywidualny kapitał społeczny to potencjalne zasoby sieci osobistych i społecznych jednostki, z których „korzysta” ona w różnych sytuacjach życiowych. Badanie wykazało zależność pomiędzy indywidualnym kapitałem społecznym studentów, a ich dobrostanem emocjonalnym.

EN

The article presents the results of the research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 among students of the University of Bialystok. The aim of the study was to determine the meaning of individual social capital for the emotional well-being of students. Emotional well-being has been defined as an overall assessment of an individual’s quality of life. Individual social capital is a potential resource of personal and social networks of individuals, which they “use” in various life situations. The study showed an interdependence between the individual social capital of students and their emotional well-being.

Keywords

PL

indywidualny kapitał społeczny; dobrostan emocjonalny; studenci; pandemia COVID-19

EN

individual social capital; emotional well-being; students; COVID-19 pandemic

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Edukacja Międzykulturowa
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 135-150

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Jolanta Muszyńska

• Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

• https://orcid.org/0000000281164343

author

Szymon Cyprian Czupryński

• Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

• https://orcid.org/0000000349951571

References

• Archuleta, A.J. and Miller, CH.R. 2011. Validity Evidence for the Translated Version of the Personal Social Capital Scale Among People of Mexican Descent, Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. 2 (2), pp. 39– –53. DOI: 10.5243/jsswr.2011.2.
• Armitage, R. and Nellums, L.B. 2020. COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly. Lancet Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30061-X.
• Arthaud-Day, M.L., Rode, J.C., Mooney, C. and Near, J.P. 2005. The subjective well-being construct: a test of its convergent, discriminant, and Factorial validity. Social Indicators Research. 74, pp. 445–476.
• Berkman, L.F. 1995. The role of social relations and health promotions. Psychosomatic Medicine. 57, pp. 245–254.
• Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Bullen, P., and Onyx, J. 2005. Measuring social capital in five communities in NSW: A practitioner’s guide. Cooge, New South Wales, Australia: Management Alternatives.
• Buser, J.K. and Kearney, A. 2017. Stress, adaptive coping, and life satisfaction. Journal of College Counseling. 20 (3), pp. 224–236.
• Chen, X., Stanton, B., Gong, J., Fang, X. and Lin, X. 2009. Personal Social Capital Scale: an instrument for health and behavioral research, Health Education Research. 24 (2), pp. 306–317, https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyn020.
• Coleman, J.S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Diener, E.D., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J. and Griffin, S. 1985. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment. 49 (1), pp. 71–75.
• Diener, E., Suh, E., and Oishi, S. 1997. Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology. 24, pp. 25–41.
• Długosz, P. 2020. Raport z badań: „Krakowscy studenci w sytuacji zagrożenia pandemią Kraków: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie.
• Dudwick, N., Kuehnast, K., Jones, V.N., and Woolcock, M. 2006. Analyzing social capital in context: A guide to using qualitative methods and data. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/Analyzing_Social_Capital_in_Context-FINAL.pdf.
• Fiorillo, A. and Gorwood, P. 2020. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice. European Psychiatry, https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.35.
• Genta, F.D. 2021. COVID-19 pandemic impact on sleep habits, chronotype, and health-related quality of life among high school students: a longitudinal study, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 17 (7). doi.org/10.5664/ jcsm9196.
• Hudson, L. and Chapman, C. 2002. The measurement of social capital in the United States. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on the Measurement of Social Capital, London, England. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/55/2382454.pdf.
• Juczyński, Z. 2001. Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia. Skala Satysfakcji z Życia. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego, s. 134–138.
• Lin, N. 2001. Building a network theory of social capital. In: Lin, N, Cook, K. and Hawthorne, R.S.B. (eds.). Social capital: Theory and research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 3–30.
• Lopes, PN., Salovey, P., Côté, S., Beers, M. and Petty, R.E. 2005. Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528–3542.5.1.113.
• Marek, K., Białoń, P., Wichowicz, H., Melloch, H. i Nitka-Siemińska, A. 2005. Przesiewowa ocena rozpowszechnienia objawów depresyjnych i lękowych wśród studentów Akademii Medycznej w Gdańsku. 2 (4), pp. 217–224.
• McCallister, L. and Fischer, C. 1978. A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods and Research. 7, pp. 131–148.
• Montemurro, N. 2020. The emotional impact of COVID-19: from medical staff to common people. Brain Behav Immun. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.032.
• Moturu, T., Khayal, I., Aharony, N., Pan, W. and Pentland, A. 2011. Sleep, mood and sociability in a healthy population. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 5267–5270. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091303.
• Moser, C. 1996. Confronting Crisis: A Comparative Study of Household Responses to Poverty and Vulnerability in Four Poor Urban Communities. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series 8. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
• Narayan, D., 1995. Designing Community-Based Development. Social Development Paper World Bank, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Network, Washington, D.C. Processed.
• Nosek, M., Furher, M. and Potter, C. 1995, Life satisfaction of people with physical disabilities: relationship to personal assistance, disability status and handicap. Rehabilitation Psychology. 40 (3), pp. 191–202.
• Portes, A. 1998. Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology. 24, pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev. soc.24.1.1.
• Putnam, R.D. 2008. Samotna gra w kręgle. Upadek i odrodzenie wspólnot lokalnych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
• Schafrt, K. 1998. Grassroots Development and the Reconfiguration of Local Political Institutions: Local Minority Self-Governance as a Political and Economic Resource for Hungary’s Roma Population. Paper presented at die Graduate Student Conference on International Affairs, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. Processed.
• Snijders, T.A.B. 1999. Prologue to the measurament of social capital. La Revue Tocqueville. 20, pp. 27–44.
• Styła, R. 2009. Kwestionariusz do Pomiaru Indywidualnego Kapitału Społecznego (KPIKS) – wstępna propozycja oparta na idei generatora zasobów Toma Snijdersa. Psychologia Społeczna. 4, 1–2 (10), ss. 67–77.
• Szczepańska, A. i Pietrzyka, K. 2021. The COVID-19 epidemic in Poland and its influence on the quality of life of university students (young adults) in the context of restricted access to public spaces. Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice. doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01456-z.
• Saegert, S. and Winkel, G. 1998. Social capital and the revitalization of New York City’s distressed inner-city housing. Housing Policy Debate. 9.
• Unger, D.G. and Wandersman, A. 1985. The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive and affective components of neighboring. American Journal of Community Psychology. 13, pp. 139–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00905726.
• Whitley, R. and McKenzie, K. 2005. Social capital and psychiatry: Review of the literature. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 13 (2), pp. 71–84. DOI: 10.1080/ 10673220590956474.
• Van der Gaag, M.P.J., Snijders, T.A.B. and Flap, H.D. 2008. Position genera¬tor measures and their relationship to other social capital measures. In: Lin, N. and Erickson, B. eds. Social capital: Advances in research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 27–48.
• Van der Gaag, M.P.J. and Snijders, T.A.B. 2005. The Resource Generator: Measurement of individual social capital with concrete items. Social Networks. 27, 1–29.
• Varshney, A. 2000. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
• Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. 2000. Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer. 15 (2), pp. 225–49.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/em.2022.01.09

Biblioteka Nauki

2031290