Montesquieu’s Attempt to Establish History as Science

• Authors: Przemysław Wewiór

Abstracts

EN

The essay deals with Montesquieu’s methodology of history. My crucial assumption is that Montesquieu intends to cultivate history as science. In the 18th century this ambition meant that he wanted to use the analytical method in the field of history. His works include many examples of the successful exploitation of analysis. Since the philosopher does not consider his methods, my aim will be to extract from his works the ideas that stand behind his historical investigations. In other words, I am going to answer how history can be practiced as science (in the Enlightenment sense of this term). First of all, I am going to explain why analysis was – and still is – so efficient in a realm of natural phenomena. My point will be that it indicated to early modern scientist how they should conduct their experiments. On the other hand, experiments give advantage to scientists due to the fact that they are able to construct and control their object. To put it differently: analysis and experiments are efficient because truth and action are convertible. Now, my crucial question is: ‘Are historians capable of gaining advantage over their objects as physicists are?’ Giambattista Vico, for example, agrees. According to him, researchers can comprehend historical events because history is man-made. Some parts of Montesquieu’s works indicate that he shares Vico’s assumptions. Hence, historians are able to scrutinize past factors, and they can perform thought experiments. Such experiments are means for validating and abolishing hypotheses by using counterfactuals.

Keywords

EN

Montesquieu; Enlightenment; methodology of history; analysis; thought experiments; counterfactuals; verum-factum principle; Giambattista Vico

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Kultura i Edukacja
• Year: 2013
• Issue: 6(99)
• Pages: 54-65

Dates

published

2013

Contributors

author

Przemysław Wewiór

• University of Wroclaw

References

• Carrithers D., Montesquieu’s Philosophy’s of History, “Journal of the History of Ideas” 1986, No. 47.
• Cassirer E., The Philosophy of the Enlightenment [tr. F. Koelln, J. Petegrove], Princenton 1951.
• Crombie A., Science, Art. And Nature in Medieval and Modern Thought, London 1996.
• Descartes R., Meditations on First Philosophy [tr. E. Haldane], Raleigh 1996, EBSCOhost, http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=29ef59b8-376e-41d7-9484-a316f2a63156 %40sessionmgr10&vid=1&hid=20&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#d b=nlebk&AN=1086191 [Access date: 07.06.13].
• Drake S., Essays on Galileo and the History and Philosophy of Science, Toronto–Buffalo–London 1999.
• Hobbes T., De Cive, or the Citizen, New York 1949, Archive.org, http://archive.org/details/deciveorcitizen00inhobb [Access date: 08.06.13].
• Miner R., Verum-factum and Practical Wisdom in the Early Writings of Giambattista Vico, “Journal of the History of Ideas” 1998, No. 59.
• Montesquieu, An Essay on the Causes That May Affect Men’s Minds and Characters [tr. M. Richter], “Political Theory” 1976, No. 2, Jstor, http://www.jstor.org/stable/190626 [Access date: 08.10.13].
• Montesquieu, Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and their Decline [tr. D. Lowenthal], Indianapolis 1999.
• Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws. 2 Vols, Worcester 1802, Hein online, http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=cow/spiritlaw&collection=beal [Access date: 14.05.13].
• Myers R., Montesquieu on the Causes of Roman Greatness, ”History of Political Thought” 1995, No. 16.
• Natural experiments in History, J. Diamond, J. Robinson (eds.), Cambridge–London 2010.
• Newton I., Optics: or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of Light, London 1730, Archive.org, http://archive.org/details/opticksortreatis1730newt [Access date: 07.06.13].
• Oake R., Montesquieu’s Analysis of Roman History, “Journal of the History of Ideas” 1955, No. 16.
• Reiss J., Counterfactuals, Thought Experiments, and Singular Causal Analysis in History, “Philosophy of Science” 2009, No. 76.
• Schuurman P., Determinism and Causal Feedback Loops in Montesquieu’s Explanations for the Military Rise and Fall of Rome, “British Journal for the History of Philosophy” (forthcoming).
• Vico G., The New Science of Giambattista Vico [tr. T. Bergin, M. Fisch], Ithaca 1948, Internet Archive, http://ia600302.us.archive.org/23/items/newscienceofgiam030174mbp/newscienceo fgiam030174mbp.pdf [Access date: 14.05.2013].

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/kie.2013.06.03

Biblioteka Nauki

25806585