Fiduciary Transfer of Ownership for Security Purposes & Retention of Ownership by a Seller

• Authors: Anastasia Riabchynska

Abstracts

EN

The article is devoted to security constructions such as fiduciary transfer of ownership and retention of ownership by the seller under a contract of sale within the framework of European private law. The author points out that the transfer of ownership for security purposes is a security right, at the same time the retention of the legal title should be qualified as a quasi-security right, because the security property interest in it is not transferred by the debtor to the creditor, but is being retained by a seller. It was found that the security transfer of ownership as a means of ensuring the fulfilment of the obligation has both incentive and compensatory functions unlike the retention of title security instrument which only encourages the buyer to fulfill the obligation paying for the goods by retaining ownership by the seller. It has been shown that in contrast with transfer of ownership as security right which allows the creditor to satisfy his property interest at the expense of security property, retention of ownership by the seller enables the seller to satisfy such interest at the expense of ownership until full payment. This article highlights the German and French civil law governing the enforcement of security arrangements for the transfer of ownership and the retention of ownership by the seller. It is concluded that the distinguishing features of these security institutions related to: default remedies of creditor, the transfer of ownership moment, and claiming property from the bankruptcy estate of the debtor.

Keywords

EN

security right; fiduciary transfer of ownership for security purposes; retention of ownership; retention of title; quasi-security right

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 3(27)
• Pages: 107-124

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Anastasia Riabchynska

• Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman

References

• Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment. 16, November 2001. Cape Town. URL: https://www.icao.int/sustainability/Docu¬ments/CPTConvention_AnnexA.pdf.
• German Civil Code BGB. Bundesministerium der Justiz für Ferbraucherschutz. URL: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#p3782.
• French Civil Code (consolidated version of May 19, 2013). URL: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/fr/fr512en.pdf.
• Insolvency Statute (Insolvenzordnung, InsO). 5 October, 1994. Translation provided by the Federal Ministry of Justice. URL: https://german¬lawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=773.
• Extraits de la Loi n° 94–475 du 10 juin 1994 relative à la prévention et au traitement des difficultés des entreprises (1996). Journal official de la Polynesie Française. URL: http://lexpol.cloud.pf/document.ph-p?document=190755&deb=537&fin=546&titre=TG9pIG7CsCA5NC00NzUgZHUgMTAvMDYvMTk5NA==.
• Faber W. Lurger B. (2011). Schriften zur Europäischen Rechtswissenschaft. European Legal Studies/Etudes juridiques europée¬nnes. Vol. 12. URL: https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/333729536.pdf.
• Halkova, E.V. (2016). Obespechytelnaia peredacha tytula po hermanskomu pravu [Security transfer of title under German law]. Zakon. [in Russian]. URL: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/87160-obespechitel¬naya-peredacha-titula-germanskomu-pravu.
• Khalabudenko, O.A. (2016). Konsensualna systema perekhodu prava vlasnostы VS. Systema tradytsii: kompromis v Modelnykh Pravylakh Yevropeiskoho Pryvatnoho Prava THE DCFR» [«Consen¬sual system of transfer of ownership VS. The system of tradi¬tion: a compromise in the Model Rules of European Private Law THE DCFR»]. Chasopys tsyvilistyky. Vyp. 21. [in Ukrainian]. URL: http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/8780/70-77.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
• Kharchenko, H. (2019). Perekhid rechovykh prav za dohovorom (kauzalna ta abstraktna modeli) [Transfer of rights in rem under the contract (causal and abstract models)]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. Vyp. 1. [in Ukrainian]. URL: http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/ar¬chive/2019/1/9.pdf.
• Lanyna, O.V. (2011). Obespechytelnaia funktsyia ohovorky ob uderzhanyy pravovoho tytula kredytorom: opыt vedushchykh pravoporiadkov sovremennosty [Security function of a retention-of-title clause by a creditor: experience of modern law enforcement]. Vestnyk hrazhdanskoho prava». Vyp. 6. [in Russian]. URL: https://center-bereg.ru/b4435.html.
• Maidanyk, R.A. (2019). Rechove pravo [Property law]. Kyiv, Alerta [in Ukrainian].
• Nykytyn, A.V. (2018). Tytulnoe obespechenye VS. Kvazyobespechenye. tezysы k nauchno-praktycheskomu kruhlomu stolu Yurydyches-koho ynstytuta «M-Lohos». [Security VS. Quasi-security]. Moskva. [in Russian]. URL: https://m-logos.ru/img/A_Nikitin_M-Logos_KS_24102018.pdf.
• Provansal A. (2018). La clause de propriété dans la vente d’immeubles: condition ou sûreté? URL: https://aappe.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/LA-CLAUSE-DE-RESERVE-DE-PROPRIETE-AP-12-2018.pdf.
• Puchkovska, I.Y. (2017). Teoretychni problemy zabezpechennia zobov’iazan [Theoretical problems of securing obligations]. Kharkiv, Pravo [in Ukrainian]
• Sarbash, S.V. (2008). Obespechytelnaia peredacha pravovoho tytula [Security transfer of title]. Vestnyk hrazhdanskoho prava. Vyp. 1. [in Rus¬sian]. URL: https://wiselawyer.ru/poleznoe/33411-obespechitelnaya-peredacha-pravovogo-titula.
• Schulte-Nölke H., Clive E. & Christian von Bar (eds.). (2009) Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). Sellier European law publishers. URL: https://www.law.kuleuven.be/personal/mstorme/2009_02_DCFR_OutlineEdition.pdf.
• Schutte, PJW (2012). The characteristics of an abstract system for the transfer of property in South African Law as distinguished from a causal system. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256037180_The_Char-acteristics_of_an_Abstract_System_for_the_Transfer_of_Property_in_South_African_Law_as_Distinguished_from_a_Causal_System/link/5713685208ae4ef74528a5cf/download.
• Tsvetkova, Y.H. (2020) Obespechytelnoe pravo sobstvennosty na tovar vo frantsuzskom prave [Security transfer of ownership under French law]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats ΛΌHOΣ. [in Ukrainian]. URL: https://ojs.ukrlogos.in.ua/index.php/logos/article/view/4135.
• van Erp, J.H.M., Akkermans B. (2012). Cases, Materials and Text on Na¬tional, Supranational and International Property Law. Oxford, Hart Publishing.
• Vijn S. (2015). Is harmonization of retention of title necessary and feasible? MaRBLe Research Papers. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319983365_Is_harmonization_of_retention_of_title_nec¬essary_and_feasible.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ksm20200308

Biblioteka Nauki

1931326