The Role of Public Administration Science in Increasing Civic Engagement in Ukraine

• Authors: Kateryna Semenova

Abstracts

EN

The article considers the problems of scientific comprehension of electronic participation from the point of view of public administration. Attention is paid to the highest form of e-democracy, namely the involvement of citizens in decision-making through ICT. The theoretical and methodological bases of research of electronic participation are defined - its levels, models, directions are analyzed. It is proposed to consider the process of involving citizens not only from a purely technological perspective, but taking into account a wider range of factors. The influence of social factors on the process of public involvement is characterized. Insufficient motivation of the citizens to interact with the government is highlighted as one of the most important obstacles to the development of e-democracy. The leading role in overcoming the existing problems is given to the fundamental science of public administration, whose task is not only to study the features of separated tools of e-participation, but also to determine strategic priorities for involving citizens in decision-making for sustainable development. The main strategy for increasing the interest of citizens in cooperation with the authorities and improving their decision-making skills in the information society is the formation of an efficient system of civic education.

Keywords

EN

e-participation; e-democracy; e-decision making; social capital; civic; education

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 1(29)
• Pages: 95-111

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Kateryna Semenova

• National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

References

• Aichholzer, G., Allhutter, D. (2009). Online forms of political participa¬tion and their impact on democracy. Verlag d. Österr. Akad. d. Wiss. Retrieved from: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/e27e56b4-fb6b-4c8b-980a-3b8357edd8e4.pdf.
• Berg, J. (2017). Digital democracy – studies of online political par¬ticipation. Åbo Akademi University Press. Retrieved from: https://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/147647/berg_janne.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
• Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2017). Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy “Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii rozvytku elektronnoi demokratii v Ukraini ta planu zakhodiv shchodo yii realizatsii” [Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On approval of the Concept of e-democracy development in Ukraine and the action plan for its implementation”]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/797-2017-%D1%80#Text.
• Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2018). Rozporiadzhennia “Pro Skh¬valennia Kontseptsii Rozvytku Hromadianskoi Osvity V Ukraini” [Order “On Approval of the Concept of Civic Education Develop¬ment in Ukraine”]. Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/710–2018-%D1%80#Text.
• Council of Europe (2009). Electronic democracy. Recommendation CM/Rec(2009) of the Committee of Ministers to member states on elec¬tronic democracy (e-democracy) Retrieved from: https://www.coe.int/t/dgap/goodgovernance/Activities/Key-Texts/Recommenda-tions/Recommendation_CM_Rec2009_1_en_PDF.pdf.
• Grönlund, Å., (2011) Connecting eGovernment to Real Govern¬ment – The Failure of the UN eParticipation Index. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6846. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 26–37. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publica-tion/221561311_Connecting_eGovernment_to_Real_Government_-_The_Failure_of_the_UN_eParticipation_Index.
• Häuberer, J. (2011). Social Capital Theory. Towards a Methodologi¬cal Foundation. Retrieved from: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bit-stream/123456789/592/1/59.pdf.
• Kassen, M. (2020). E-participation actors: understanding roles, con¬nections, partnerships, Knowledge Management Research & Prac-tice, 18:1, 16–37. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329326488_E-participation_actors_understanding_roles_connections_partnerships.
• Kneuer, M. (2016). E-democracy: A new challenge for measuring de¬mocracy. International Political Science Review. 2016;37(5):666- 678. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310733789_E-democracy_A_new_challenge_for_measuring_democracy.
• Lee J., Kim S. (2014). Active Citizen E-Participation in Local Governance: Do Individual Social Capital and E-Participation Management Mat¬ter?. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/pub¬lication/262245436_Active_Citizen_E-Participation_in_Local_Gover-nance_Do_Individual_Social_Capital_and_E-Participation_Manage¬ment_Matter.
• Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Computer Society Press. Retrieved from: https://www.computer.org/csdl/pds/api/csdl/proceedings/download-article/12OmNwoPttU/pdf.
• Naranjo-Zolotov, M., Oliveira, T., Casteleyn, S. (2017). E-participation adoption models research in the last 17 years: A weight and meta-analytical review. Computers in Human Behavior. 81. 10.1016/j. chb.2017.12.031. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322004714_E-participation_adoption_models_research_in_the_last_17_years_A_weight_and_meta-analytical_review.
• Porwol, L., Ojo, A., Breslin, J. (2013) On the Duality of E-Participation – Towards a Foundation for Citizen-Led Participation. In: Kő A., Leitner C., Leitold H., Prosser A. (eds) Technology-Enabled Innova¬tion for Democracy, Government and Governance. EGOVIS/EDEM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8061. Springer, Ber¬lin, Heidelberg. Retrieved from: http://johnbreslin.org/files/publica¬tions/20130826_egov2013.pdf.
• Prieto-Martín, P. & de-Marcos, L. & Martínez, J. (2012). The e-(R)evolu¬tion will not be funded. An interdisciplinary and critical analysis of the developments and troubles of EU-funded eParticipation. The Euro¬pean Journal of ePractice. 15. 62–89. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292977012_The_e-Revolution_will_not_be_funded_An_interdisciplinary_and_critical_analysis_of_the_de¬velopments_and_troubles_of_EU-funded_eParticipation.
• Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of Ameri¬can community. New York: Simon and Schuster. Retrieved from: https://www.dacdb.com/Rotary/Accounts/6970/Downloads/4381/Bowling%20Alone%20Article.pdf.
• Sabatini, F., Sarracino, F. (2014). “E-participation: social capital and the Internet,” MPRA Paper 55722, University Library of Munich, Ger¬many. Retrieved from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55722/1/MPRA_paper_55722.pdf.
• Sæbø, O., Rose, J., Skiftenesflak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly. 25, 400–428. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222839683_The_Shape_of_Eparticipation_Charac-terizing_an_Emerging_Research_Area.
• Sanford, C. & Rose, J. (2007). Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 406–421. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235721824_Character¬izing_eParticipation.
• Tomkova, J. (2016). eDemokratiia v Ukraini: Pohliady hromadian i kli¬uchovykh zatsikavlenykh storin [eDemocracy in Ukraine: Citizens’ & Key Stakeholders’ Perspectives], Kyiv, Ukraine. Retrieved from: http://egap.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/UKRAINIAN-Report-Open-Mic.pdf.
• Tomkova, J., Khutkiy, D. (2017). Analitychni Zapysky Z Efektyvnoho E-Uriaduvannia. Vypusk 2 Vtilennia E-Demokratii Spektr Instrumentiv Ta Varianty Vyboru [Analytical Notes on Effective E-Government. Is¬sue №2: The Implementation of E-Democracy: A Range of Tools and Choices], Kyiv, Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://egap.in.ua/biblioteka/analitychni-zapysky-z-efetyvnoho-e-uriaduvannia-vypusk-2/?wpdmdl=8929&ind=H7zQG0Bj5iscmPWlEMam2Rr20NtwKrnOvZvce26PPn5-xprTHjJc1aajdRpb6ATJ.
• Tomkova, J., Konashevych, O. (2016). Analitychni zapysky z efektyvno¬ho e-uriaduvannia. Vypusk 1. Zakonodavchi aspekty elektronnoi de¬mokratii v Ukraini [Analytical Notes on Effective E-Government. Is¬sue #1 Legislative Aspects of e-Democracy in Ukraine], Kyiv, Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://egap.in.ua/biblioteka/analitychni-zapysky-z-efetyvnoho-e-uriaduvannia-vypusk-1/?wpdmdl=8927&ind=lki-Yt¬isSRZ6nc5eDEG45pTAb78Oi-c41V76JOgB_VHzhWCDc9A1rFod¬ShxWdJUk.
• UN/David Le Blanc (2020). E-participation: A Quick Overview of Recent Qualitative Trends, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Working Papers, No. 163, UN, New York. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2020/wp163_2020.pdf.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ksm20210108

Biblioteka Nauki

1931985