Problematic Issues of Foreclosure on the Object of Pledge of Property Guarantor (Resident of Ukraine)

• Authors: Vitalii Krasutskyi

Abstracts

EN

The author of the article investigates the peculiarities of the procedure for foreclosure on the property of a property guarantor, as there are currently problems with the practical application of legal norms. The author assumes that one of the main ways to ensure the fulfillment of obligations arising from credit relations is a pledge with the participation of a property guarantor who is a party to the mortgage relationship. The relationship between the mortgagor and the debtor on the main obligation is not collateral, the rights and obligations arising between them are not included in the content of the mortgage relationship. The shortcomings of civil law regulation of relations in this area have been identified and amendments to the legislation of Ukraine on pledge have been proposed. The need for analysis and further study of the status of the property guarantor, ksm2021205 ie the person who mortgages the property belonging to him to ensure the fulfillment of the debtor’s obligation to the mortgagee. Improving the effectiveness of law enforcement also requires improving the mechanism of legal regulation of contractual relations.

Keywords

EN

pledge; object of pledge; mortgage; foreclosure; property guarantor

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 2(30)
• Pages: 66-83

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Vitalii Krasutskyi

• Kyiv National Economics University named after Vadym Hetman

References

• Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 r., № 435-IV (2003). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 40. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15 [in Ukrainian].
• Zhytlovyi kodeks Ukrainskoi RSR: Zakon Ukrainskoi Radianskoi Sotsial¬istychnoi Respubliky vid 30.06.1983 r., № 5464-X (1983). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady URSR, 28. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5464-10#Text [in Ukrainian].
• Pro zastavu [On Pledge]: Zakon Ukrainy 2.10.1992, № 2654-XII (1992). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 47. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2654-12 [in Ukrainian].
• Pro ipoteku: Zakon Ukrainy vid 05.06.2003 r., № 898-IV (2003). Vido¬mosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 38. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/898-15 [in Ukrainian].
• Pro zabezpechennia vymoh kredytoriv ta reiestratsiiu obtiazhen [On Securing Creditors’ Claims and Registration of Encumbrances]: Za-kon Ukrainy 18.11.2003, № 1255-IV1 (2004). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 11 [in Ukrainian].
• Sprava № 910/11051/19: рostanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 02.09.2020 [The decree of the Supreme Court]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91340985 [in Ukrainian].
• Sprava № 361/7543/17: рostanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 19.05.2020 [The decree of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89819777 [in Ukrainian].
• Sprava № 753/72/17: рostanova Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 31.03.2021 у справі №. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/96074863 [in Ukrainian].
• Sprava № 310/11534/13-ц: рostanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovno¬ho Sudu vid 04.07.2018 [The decree of the Supreme Court]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/75287282 [in Ukrainian].
• Shymon S.I. (2019) ,Zvernennia stiahnennia na predmet zastavy – maino¬vi prava (perevahy y nedoliky zakonodavchykh rishen) [Foreclosure on subject of pledge – property rights (advantages and disadvantages of legislative decisions)]. Kyiv. Pravove rehuliuvannia ekonomiky. № 18. P. 94–104. URL: https://kneu.edu.ua/userfiles/24_11_2015/2019/ZBD086D0A0NI_PD0A0E_2019_28E284961829stor__-94-104.pdf. [in Ukranian].

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ksm20210205

Biblioteka Nauki

1930591