Jury in Civil Procedure in the Context of Judicial Reform in Ukraine

• Authors: Raisa Minchenko , Daria Minchenko

Abstracts

EN

The scientific article is devoted to the definition of directions of improvement of the jury trial in civil proceedings of Ukraine. It unveils the historical origins of formation of the jury trial as one of the important democratic institutions, which provides the possibility of direct participation of people in the administration of justice and is a civilized means of protecting civil society from judicial arbitrariness and corruption in the judiciary. Two models of jury trial are described: the Anglo-Saxon and the continental. The existing scientific controversy on the expediency of the functioning of the jury in civil proceedings and the effectiveness of some, including complex, civil cases with the participation of the jury are described. It is argued that the reasons for the inefficiency of the jury trial in Ukraine are the non-transparent system of forming the jury lists, the lack of state funding for the jury trial, public misunderstanding of the benefits of the jury trial, and thus the non-acceptance of the jury by the vast majority of citizens and their evasion of the duties of jurors. It is concluded that it is inexpedient to preserve the jury trial in civil proceedings in its current form, as this will only harm the tasks of civil proceedings. The authors propose the ways to improve the model of the jury trial in civil proceedings in Ukraine, in particular, by building a transparent system for forming a list of jurors as a result of outreach work among the population and decent pay for jurors.

Keywords

EN

justice; democracy; democratic institutions; lay judges; trial; jury verdict; judicial system

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Krakowskie Studia Małopolskie
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 2(30)
• Pages: 84-96

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Raisa Minchenko

• NGO Legal Dimension

author

Daria Minchenko

• NGO Legal Dimension

References

• Buryi A., Taratula R., Topolevskyi R., Topolevska L. Mizhnarodnyi dosvid diialnosti instytutiv myrovoho suddi, sudu prysiazhnykh, narodnykh zasidateliv ta propozytsii shchodo mozhlyvostei yoho zastosuvannia v Ukraini [International experience of the institute of justice of the peace, jury, lay judges and proposals for its application in Ukraine]. Lviv: Regional Public Foundation “Law and Democracy”, 2009. 131 p.
• Fursa S.Y., Shcherbak S.V., Yevtushenko O.I. Tsyvilnyi protses: Problemy ta perspektyvy [Civil Procedure: Problems and Prospects]. K.: Pub¬lisher Fursa S.Y.: KNT, 2006. 446 p.
• Harris W.R., Jury trial in civil cases – a problem in constitutional inter¬pretation. Southwestern Law Journal. Vol. 7. Issue 1. pp. 1–20. URL: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol7/iss1/1.
• Iatsenko N.G., Narodni zasidateli ta sud prysiazhnykh u tsyvilnomu protsesi: istoriia i suchasnist. [Jurors and the jury in civil proceedings: history and modernity]. Visnyk Vyshchoi rady yustytsii [Bulletin of the High Council of Justice]. 2011. № 1 (5). pp. 109–118.
• Kolisnyk O.V., Neprofesiinyi element skladu sudu u tsyvilnomu sudochyn¬stvi u konteksti yevropeiskoho dosvidu. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia [Non-professional element of court com¬position in civil proceedings in the context of European experience. State building and local self-government]. 2008. Issue 15. pp. 136– –144.
• Lempert R.O., Civil juries and complex cases: let’s not rush to judgment. Michigan Law Review. 1981, Vol. 80, Issue 1. pp. 68–132. URL: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol80/iss1/3.
• Smirnova V., Pravovi pidstavy uchasti prysiazhnykh u tsyvilnomu sudo¬chynstvi Ukrainy. [Legal grounds for the participation of jurors in civil proceedings in Ukraine]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. [En¬trepreneurship, economy and law]. 2019, № 5, pp. 66–72.
• Tatulych I., Pravovyi status prysiazhnykh u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi [Legal status of jurors in civil proceedings]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hosp-odarstvo i pravo. [Entrepreneurship, economy and law]. 2019., № 12, pp. 67–72.
• Recommendations of the joint committee hearings in the committees of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on law enforcement and legal policy on the topic: «Prospects for development, issues of formation and functioning of the jury in Ukraine», approved by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Committee on Law Enforcement. (Protocol № 37 of 01.07.2020). URL: http://komzakonpr.rada.gov.ua/uploads/docu¬ments/32665.pdf.
• Decision of the Kakhovskyi City District Court of the Kherson Region of 12.10.2020 in case №658/3207/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/92144785.
• Decision of the Moskovskyi District Court of Kharkiv of 09.12.2020 in case № 643/2667/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Re-view/93415313.
• Decision of the Mar`inskyi District Court of the Donetsk Region of 1.02.2002 in case №237/974/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/94648308.
• Decision of the Prydniprovskyi District Court of Cherkasy of 20.01.2021 in case №711/5743/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Re-view/94268662.
• Decision of the Prymorsky District Court of Odesa of 25.02.2020 in case №522/20546/19. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Re-view/87814974.
• Decision of the Romensky City District Court of the Sumy Region of 13.03.2020 in case №585/482/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88193569.
• Decision of the Romensky City District Court of the Sumy Region of 6.04.2020 in case №585/482/20. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88608822.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ksm20210206

Biblioteka Nauki

1930592