Joe Biden’s Strategy in the Asia-Pacific Region: Change or Continuity. A Comparative Analysis

• Authors: Marcin Grabowski

Abstracts

EN

The election of Joseph Biden for the office of the President of the United States has brought expectations of fundamental change in American foreign policy, including policy toward the Asia-Pacific/Indo-Pacific region. As observed in the last few months, the reality has been more complex as definite changes in the US Indo-Pacific policy are not as visible as expected. It is especially in respect of the US policy toward China being more a continuation than a change from Donald Trump’s approach. Changes are rhetorical rather than actual policies. The situation is different in the case of alliances, as Joe Biden offers much more commitment to allies like Japan or South Korea. Also, multilateral dimensions (both regional and global) witness some – however still limited – change. The main goal is to make a comparative analysis of Joe Biden’s policy toward Asia, referring to the administrations of Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Hence the strategies of pivot/re-balance toward the Asia of Obama, and the free and open Indo-Pacific strategy of Trump, will be examined. The analysis refers to the complex interdependence theory and the power transition theory. Methodologically, it is based on document analysis with comparative analysis.

Keywords

EN

Joe Biden; Asia-Pacific; Indo-Pacific; United States; Barack Obama; Donald Trump

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Polish Political Science Yearbook
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 4 (50)
• Pages: 95-105

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Marcin Grabowski

• Jagiellonian University

• https://orcid.org/0000000314471818

References

• Asian Development Bank. (2021). Shareholders. https://www.adb.org/site/investors/credit-fundamentals/shareholders
• Campbell, K. (2016). The Pivot: The Future of American Statecraft in Asia.
• Department of State. (2019). A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision. https://www.state.gov/a-free-and-open-indo-pacific-advancing-a-shared-vision/
• Duggan, N., & Grabowski, M. (2021). The Influence of Covid-19 on Power Transition between the U.S. and China. Irish Journal of International Affairs.
• Elms, D. (2018). The Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership: Policy Innovations and Impacts. GED Working Paper. http://aei.pitt.edu/102526/1/MT_Comprehensive_and_Progressive_Trans-Pacific_Partnership.pdf
• Fels, E. (2017). Shifting Power in the Asia-Pacific?: The Rise of China, Sino-US Competition and Regional Middle Power Allegiance.
• Geaney, D. (2021). How the Biden Administration Should Counter China in Southeast Asia. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/2479121/how-the-biden-administration-should-counter-china-in-southeast-asia/
• Glaser, B., & Price, H. (2021). Continuity Prevails in Biden’s First 100 Days. Comparative Connections, 23(1). http://cc.pacforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/May-2021-Comparative-Connections-23-1-2.pdf
• Grabowski, M. (2011). Will Trans-Pacific Strategic Partnership Agreement increase the competitiveness of the Asia-Pacific Region? In B. Skulska, & A. Jankowiak (Eds.), Faces of Competitiveness in Asia Pacific (pp. 61–73). Wroclaw University of Economics.
• Grabowski, M., & Duggan, N. (2021). Donald Trump Presidency and the Transformation of Sino-American Relations: Does Asymmetric Economic Interdependence Matter? Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 20(2).
• Grabowski, M., & Pugacewicz, T. (2017). Is Trans-Pacific Partnership a Challenge for Transatlantic Relations?: A Comparative Analysis of TPP and TTIP in the Context of the US Global Role. In M. Zachara (Ed.) Poland in Transatlantic Relations after 1989: Miracle Fair ( 86–124). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Grabowski, M., & Pugacewicz, T. (2019). Western IR Theories: Analytical Patterns. In M. Grabowski, & T. Pugacewicz (Eds.), Application of International Relations Theories in Asia and Africa (pp. 61–94). Peter Lang Verlag.
• International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. (2021). Subscriptions and Voting Power of Member Countries. http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/795101541106471736/IBRDCountryVotingTable.pdf
• International Monetary Fund. (2021). IMF Members’ Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors.https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx
• Joshi, Y., & Atmakuri, A. (2021). Biden’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: Expectations and Challenges. Sasakawa Peace Foundation. https://www.isas.nus.edu.sg/papers/bidens-indo-pacific-strategy-expectations-and-challenges/
• Manyin, M., Daggett, S., Dolven, B., Lawrence, S., Martin, M., O’Rourke, R., & Vaughn, B. (2012). Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s “Rebalancing” Toward Asia. CRS Report for Congress.
• Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz, K. (Eds.) (2021). Stosunki chińsko-amerykańskie w warunkach rozwoju nowoczesnych technologii. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
• Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Dmochowski, T. (Eds.). (2021). Selected Socio-Economic and International Relations Issues in Contemporary Asian States. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
• Marszałek-Kawa, J., & Stelmach, A. (Eds.) (2021). Dynamika procesów politycznych i społecznych w państwach południowej i wschodniej Azji. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2017). Diplomatic Bluebook 2017. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/other/bluebook/2017/html/chapter1/c0102.html#sf03
• Mohan, C.R., & Vater, J. (2021). Biden and South Asia. In C.R. Mohan, & J. Vater (Eds.), President Biden and South Asia (pp. 3–12). National University of Singapore.
• Palmer, J. (2021). Another Win for China’s Hostage Diplomacy: A yearslong diplomatic dispute between China and the West has finally ended. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/09/28/meng-wanzhou-michael-kovrig-spavor-release-china-canada-huawei/
• Seah, S., Hoang Thi, H., Martinus, M., & Pham Thi Phuong, T. (2021). The State of Southeast Asia 2021: Survey Report. ASEAN Studies Centre.
• The Department of Defense. (2019). Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region. https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF
• The White House. (2015). National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2015. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf
• The White House. (2017). National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
• The White House. (2021). Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf
• The White House. (2021). Remarks by President Biden, Prime Minister Morrison of Australia, and Prime Minister Johnson of the United Kingdom Announcing the Creation of AUKUS. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/09/15/remarks-by-president-biden-prime-minister-morrison-of-australia-and-prime-minister-johnson-of-the-united-kingdom-announcing-the-creation-of-aukus/

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ppsy202152

Biblioteka Nauki

2020119