Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 1(51) | 163-180

Article title

Risks and Benefits of i-Voting in Public Opinion: Evidence from Poland

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
Apart from benefits, internet voting security is most frequently discussed by opponents and supporters of this form of electoral participation. Although this voting method is not available in Poland, the debate on the implementation of i-voting appears in each election. The COVID-19 pandemic showed a great need to implement additional remote voting methods in the elections, and increasingly more countries are considering the introduction of i-vote in the future. Although there is no plan for the nearest future in Poland, citizens' opinions suggest that this voting procedure would meet many of its users. The paper's main aim is to analyse Poles' opinions about the risks and benefits of internet voting. The results of our own studies are based on a survey among Poles regarding their views on internet voting. The main goal is to verify if Poles more often highlight the benefits than risks of i-voting, and if the opinions about risks and benefits of i-voting differ depending on respondents’ sex, age, education and domicile.

Year

Issue

Pages

163-180

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

author
  • Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego (Poland)
  • Adam Mickiewicz University (Poland)

References

  • Alvarez, R. M., & & Hall, Th. E. (2004). Point, Click and Vote. The Future of Internet Voting. The Brookings Institution.
  • Alvarez, R. M., & Hall, Th. E., & Trechsel, A. H. (2009). Internet Voting in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Estonia. Political Science and Politics, 42(3), 497–505.
  • Benefits of online voting. POLYAS. https://www.polyas.com/online-voting/benefits-online-voting
  • Braun, N., & Brändli, D. (2006). Swiss E-Voting Pilot Projects: Evaluation, Situation Analysis and How to Proceed. In R. Krimmer (Ed.), Electronic Voting 2006. 2nd International Workshop Co-organized by Council of Europe (pp. 27–36). Gesellschaft für Informatik.
  • Budd, B., Gabel, C., & Goodman, N. (2019). Online Voting in a First Nation in Canada: Implications for Participation and Governance. In R. Krimmer et al. (Eds.), Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11759 (pp. 50–66). Springer.
  • Germann, M., & Serdült, U. (2017). Internet voting and turnout: Evidence from Switzerland. Electoral Studies, 47, 1–12.
  • Global overview of COVID-19: Impact on elections. https://www.idea.int/news-media/multimedia-reports/global-overview-covid-19-impact-elections
  • James, T. S. (2021). New development: Running elections during a pandemic. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 65–68.
  • Kapsa, I., & Musiał-Karg, M. (2020). Alternatywne metody głosowania w opiniach Polaków. Postawy i poglądy względem wybranych form partycypacji w wyborach. UAM-WNPiD.
  • Kapsa, I., Musiał-Karg, M., & Luengo, Ó. (2021). E-voting and Transformation of Participation in Europe: Exploring the Profile of E-voters in Poland. In M. Musiał-Karg & Ó. Luengo (Eds.), Digitalization of democratic processes in Europe. Southern and Central Europe in Comparative Perspective (pp. 11–29). Springer International Publishing.
  • Krimmer, R. (2010). E-voting as a New Form of Voting. In A. Balci, C. Can Actan, & O. Dalbay (Eds.), Explorations in eGovernment & eGovernance, vol. 2: Selected proceedings of the Second International Conference on eGovernment and eGovernance (pp. 147–152). ICEGEG.
  • Krimmer, R., Volkamer, M., & Duenas-Cid, D. (2019). E-Voting – An Overview of the Development in the Past 15 Years and Current Discussions. In R. Krimmer et al. (Eds.), Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11759 (pp. 1–13). Springer.
  • Krimmer, R., Duenas-Cid, D., & Krivonosova, I. (2021). Debate: safeguarding democracy during pandemics. Social distancing, postal, or internet voting-the good, the bad or the ugly? Public Money & Management, 41(1), 8–10.
  • Krivonosova, I. (2021). The forgotten election administrator of internet voting: lessons from Estonia. Policy Studies. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2021.1958179
  • Licht, N., Duenas-Cid, D., Krivonosova, I., & Krimmer, R. (2021). To i-vote or not to i-vote: Drivers and Barriers to the Implementation of Internet Voting. In R. Krimmer et al. (Eds.), Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12900 (pp. 61–77). Springer.
  • Musiał-Karg, M. (2010). E-Voting as a New Form of Civic Participation in Democratic Procedures. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 39, 72–87.
  • Musiał-Karg, M. (2017). Challenges of i-voting – practices, rules and perspectives.
  • Examples from Estonia and Switzerland. Przegląd Politologiczny, 4, 61–72.
  • Musiał-Karg, M. (2020). Elektroniczne głosowanie w opiniach Polaków. Postawy i poglądy na temat e-voting. UAM-WNPiD.
  • Musiał-Karg, M., & Kapsa, I. (2021). Debate: Voting challenges in a pandemic-Poland. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 6–8.
  • Nemeslaki, A., Aranyossy, M., & Sasvári, P. (2016). Could on-line voting boost desire to vote? – Technology acceptance perceptions of young Hungarian citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 705–714.
  • Norris, P. (2004). Will New Technology Boost Turnout? Evaluating Experiments in UK Local Elections. In N. Kersting & H. Baldersheim (Eds.), Electronic Voting and Democracy (pp. 193–225). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nowina Konopka, M. Elektroniczna urna. http://www.rpo.gov.pl/pliki/12066058070.pdf
  • Prosser, A., & Krimmer, R. (2004). The Dimensions of Electronic Voting. Technology, Law, Politics and Society. In A. Prosser & R. Krimmer (Eds.), Electronic Voting in Europe. Workshop of the ESF TED Programme together with GI and OCG (pp. 21–28). Gesellschaft für Informatik.
  • Schaupp, L. Ch., & Carter, L. (2005). E-voting: from apathy to adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), 586–601.
  • Serdült, U. (2016). The Swiss Experience with Internet Voting. The Centre for E-Democracy. http://www.centreforedemocracy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Policy_Brief_Uwe_Serduit.pdf
  • Serdült, U., Germann, M., Harris, M., Mendez, F., & Portenier, A. (2015). Who are the Internet voters? In E. Tambouris et al. (Eds.), Electronic Government and Electronic Participation [Innovation and the Public Sector, 22] (pp. 27–41). IOS Press Ebooks.
  • Serdült, U., & Milic, T. (2017). Disentangling digital divide and trust: Internet voting affinity in Switzerland. In P. Parycek, Y. Charalabidis, & A. V. Chugunov (Eds.), Electronic Participation (pp. 37–52). Springer.
  • Solvak, M., & Vassil, K. (2016). E-voting in Estonia: technological diffusion and other developments over ten years (2005–2015). Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies.
  • Specter, M. A., & Halderman, J. A. (2020). Security Analysis of the Democracy Live Online Voting System. https://internetpolicy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/OmniBallot-1.pdf
  • Vassil, K., Solvak, M., Vinkel, P., Trechsel, A. H., & Alvarez, R. M. (2016). The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 453–459.
  • Warkentin, M., Sharma, S., Gefen, D., Rose, G. M., & Pavlou, P. (2018). Social identity and trust in internet-based voting adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 195–209.
  • Xenakis, A., & Macintosh, A. (2004). Procedural Security of Electronic Voting. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
  • Zada, P., Falzon G., & Kwan P. (2016). Perceptions of the Australian public towards mobile internet e-voting: risks, choice and trust. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 14, 117–34.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2056713

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15804_ppsy202215
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.