Эффективность и качество демократии в сравнительной политологии: дефинитивные и концептуальные параметры анализа

• Authors: Vitaliy S. Lytvyn

Title variants

EN

Efficiency and quality of democracy in comparative politics: definitive and conceptual options of analysis

PL

Efektywność i jakość demokracji w politologii porównawczej: definicyjne i koncepcyjne parametry analizy

Abstracts

PL

W artykule podjęta została próba historiografii i konceptualizacji efektywności i jakości demokracji. Autor przytacza definicyjne i koncepcyjne parametry analizy porównawczej dotyczące efektywności i jakości demokracji, wskazując na zróżnicowany poziom demokratyczności systemów politycznych. Przedstawione zostały również nurty teoretyczne i analizy empiryczne badające skuteczność/jakość demokracji oraz systemowe/holistyczne wskaźniki i metodologie operacjonalizacji jakości i efektywności demokracji. W artykule demokracja jest rozpatrywana jako kategoria składająca się z wielu elementów i posiadająca potencjał do zwiększenia własnej efektywności i jakości.

RU

В статье сделано попытку историографии и концептуализации феномена эффективности и качества демократии. Автор исследования очертил дефинитивные и концептуальные параметры сравнительного анализа эффективности и качества демократии. В статье выделены различные подходы, а также теоретические/ эмпирические особенности изучения эффективности/качества демократии, представлены наиболее системные/целостные индикаторы и методики ее операционализации. Демократия рассматривается как многосоставная категория, котроая способна расширять свою эффективность и качество.

EN

The article is dedicated to analyzing the historiography and conceptualization of the phenomenon of efficiency and quality of democracy. The author of the research outlined the definitive and conceptual parameters of comparative analysis of efficiency and quality of democracy, argued that different political regimes are more or less democratic. The article highlights various approaches, theoretical and empirical features of studying efficiency and quality of democracy, represents the most systemic/holistic indicators and methods of operationalization of democracy quality and efficiency. On this basis, the author actualized a unified approach to the analysis and conceptualization of quality and efficiency of democracy and argued that quality and efficiency of democracy is expedient to be mentioned not in a holistic continuum of political regimes, but when a certain state is actually democratic. As a result, the research confirmed that democracy is a multi-piece category and is able to expand its efficiency and quality.

Keywords

RU

демократия; политический режим; эффективность демократии; качество демократии; концепт демократии; минимальная демократия

PL

demokracja; ustrój polityczny; wydajność; jakość demokracji

EN

democracy; political regime; efficiency of democracy; quality of democracy

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Świat Idei i Polityki
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 14
• Pages: 110-132

Dates

published

2015

Contributors

author

Vitaliy S. Lytvyn

• Narodowy Uniwersytet Iwana Franki we Lwowie

References

• Alexander M., Democratization and Hybrid Regimes: Comparative Evidence from Southeast Europe, “East European Politics & Societies” 2008, Vol. 22, No. 4.
• Altman D., Pérez-Liñán A., Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness and Participation in Eighteen Latin American Countries, “Democratization” 2002, Vol. 9, No. 2.
• Barreda M., La calidad de la democracia: Un análisis comparado de América Latina, “Política y Gobierno” 2011, Vol. 18, No. 2.
• Bartolini S., Collusion, competition, and democracy, “Journal of Theoretical Politics” 1999, Vol. 11, No. 4.
• Bartolini S., Collusion, competition and democracy: Part II, “Journal of Theoretical Politics” 2000, Vol. 12, No. 1.
• Bogaards M., How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism, “Democratization” 2009, Vol. 16, No. 2.
• Brown A., From Democratization to “Guided Democracy”, “Journal of Democracy” 2001, Vol. 12, No. 4.
• Buhlmann M., Merkel W., Müller L., Giebler H., Wessels B., Bochsler D., Hänni M., Bousbah K., Democracy Barometer. Codebook for Blueprint Dataset Version 3, Aarau 2013.
• Buehlmann M., Merkel W., Mueller L., Wessels B., Wie lässt sich Demokratie am besten messen?, “Politische Vierteljahresschrift” 2008, Vol. 49, No. 1.
• Buehlmann M., Merkel W., Wessels B., The Quality of Democracy: Democracy Barometer for Established Democracies, “Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century” 2007, No. 10.
• Campbell D., Measuring the Quality of Democracy: A Global Comparison, Washington D.C. 2004.
• Campbell D., The Basic Concept for the Democracy Ranking of the Quality of Democracy, Vienna 2008.
• Campbell D., Pölzlbauer G., The Democracy Ranking 2008 of the Quality of Democracy: Method and Ranking Outcome, Vienna 2008.
• Campbell D., Sükösd M., Feasibility Study for a Quality Ranking of Democracies, Vienna 2002.
• Campbell D., Sükösd M., Global Quality Ranking of Democracies: Pilot Ranking 2000, Vienna 2003.
• Colton T., McFaul M., Popular Choice and Managed Democracy, Washington 2003.
• Croissant A., From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping Asian Democratization, “Democratization” 2004, Vol. 11, No. 5.
• Dahl R., A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago 1956.
• Dahl R., On Democracy, New Haven 1998.
• Diamond L., Thinking About Hybrid Regimes, “Journal of Democracy” 2002, Vol. 13, No. 2.
• Diamond L., Morlino L., The Quality of Democracy: An Overview, “Journal of Democracy” 2004, Vol. 14, No. 4.
• Harding S., Phillips D., Fogarty M., Contrasting Values in Western Europe. Unity, Diversity and Change. Studies in the Contemporary Values of Modern Society, Houndmills 1986.
• Hill K., Democracy in the Fifty States, Lincoln 1994.
• Inglehart R., Welzel C., Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence, New York 2005.
• Karatnycky A., The Decline of Illiberal Democracy, “Journal of Democracy” 1999, Vol. 10, No. 1.
• Levine D., Molina J., Measuring the Quality of Democracy, [w:] The Quality of Democracy in Latin America, ed. D. Levine, J. Molina, Boulder 2011.
• Levine D., Molina J., The Quality of Democracy: Strengths and Weaknesses in Latin America, [w:] The Quality of Democracy in Latin America, ed. D. Levine, J. Molina, Boulder 2011.
• Levitsky S., Way L., Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War (Problems of International Politics), Wyd. Cambridge University Press 2010.
• Lijphart A., Democratic Quality in Stable Democracies, “Society” 2011, Vol. 48, No. 1.
• Lijphart A., Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven 1999.
• Lijphart A., Unequal participation: Democracy’s uNo.esolved dilemma, “American Political Science Review” 1997, Vol. 91, No. 1.
• MacPherson C., Cunningham F., The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, Oxford 2012.
• Manin B., Przeworski A., Stokes S., Elections and Representation, [w:] Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. A. Przeworski, S. Stokes, B. Manin., Cambridge 1999.
• Mazzuca S., Access to Power Versus Exercise of Power: Reconceptualizing the Quality of Democracy in Latin America, “Studies in Comparative Development” 2010, Vol. 45, No. 3.
• Merkel W., Embedded and Defective Democracies, “Democratization” 2004, Vol. 11, No. 5.
• Merkel W., Embedded and Defective Democracies in the 21rst Century, Bratislava 2008.
• Merkel W., Croissant A., Conclusion: Good and Defective Democracies, “Democratization” 2004, Vol. 11, No. 5.
• Morlino L., Are there hybrid regimes? Or are they just an optical illusion?, “European Political Science Review” 2009, Vol. 1, No. 2.
• Morlino L., “Good” and “Bad” Democracies: How to Conduct Research into the Quality of Democracy, “Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics” 2004, Vol. 20, No. 1.
• Munck G., Conceptualizing the Quality of Democracy: The Framing of a New Agenda for Comparative Politics, Presented at the conference on “Guillermo O’Donnell and the Study of Authoritarianism and Democracy”, Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, March 26 – 27, 2012.
• O’Donnell G., Delegative Democracy, “Journal of Democracy” 1994, Vol. 5, No. 1.
• O’Donnell G., Democracy, Agency, and the State: Theory with Comparative Intent, Oxford 2010.
• Panizza F., Beyond “delegative democracy”: “old politics” and “new economics” in Latin America, “Journal of Latin American studies” 2000, Vol. 32, No. 3.
• Przeworski A., Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government, New York 2010.
• Putnam R., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton NJ 1993.
• Ringen S., What Democracy is For: On Freedom and Moral Government, Princeton N.J. 2007.
• Roberts A., The Quality of Democracy in Eastern Europe: Public Preferences and Policy Reforms, New York 2009.
• Saward M., The Terms of Democracy, Cambridge 1998.
• Smith P., Ziegler M., Liberal and Illiberal Democracy in Latin America, “Latin American Politics and Society” 2008, Vol. 50, No. 1.
• Vargas-Cullell J., La calidad de la democracia y el estudio comparado de la democratización, “Revista Latinoamericana de Política Comparada“ 2011, Vol. 5.
• Welzel C., Alexander A., Measuring Effective Democracy: The Human Empowerment Approach, “World Values Research” 2008, Vol. 1, No. 1.
• Wetzel A., Orbie J., Promoting embedded democracy? Researching the substance of EU democracy promotion, “European Foreign Affairs Review” 2011, Vol. 16, No. 5.
• Wolin S., Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism, Wyd. Princeton University Press 2009.
• Zakaria F., The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad, Wyd. W.W. Norton & Company 2003.
• Zakaria F., The Rise of Illiberal Democracy, “Foreign Affairs” 1997, Vol. 76, No. 6.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/siip201507

Biblioteka Nauki

2195908