The Military Perspective on the Strategic Planning Process in the United States within 2017–2018 Timeframe

• Authors: Maciej Klisz

Title variants

PL

Perspektywa wojskowa na planowanie strategiczne w Stanach Zjednoczonych w latach 2017–2018

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł charakteryzuje proces opracowywania dokumentów strategicznych w Stanach Zjednoczonych w latach 2017–2108. Głównym celem artykułu jest analiza procesu planowania w czasie rządów administracji prezydenta Donalda Trumpa oraz przedstawienie wniosków do wykorzystania w innych państwach. W treści artykułu znajduje się objaśnienie najważniejszych podstaw teoretycznych z obszaru planowania strategicznego, głównych procesów, jak również najważniejszych podmiotów organizacyjnych z obszaru bezpieczeństwa państwa. Artykuł skupia się jedynie na okresie 2017–2018 ze względu na znaczące zmiany, które zaszły w obszarze legislacyjnym, jak również udział w całym procesie planowania strategicznego kluczowych oficerów Sił Zbrojnych Stanów Zjednoczonych. W artykule wykorzystano technki oraz narzędzia badawcze z obszaru wojskowości, jednak szeroko zaprezentowano informacje dotyczące aktów prawnych czy odniesień historycznych w celu ułatwienia zrozumienia skomplikowanego procesu planowania strategicznego.

EN

The article examines the development process of the national level security strategies in the United States. It explains the basic theory of the strategy-making, as well as the primary processes and relations among the major security enterprises. The author focuses on the 2017–2018 timeframe due to the significant changes in the U.S. legislative system and exceptional personalities involved in the strategy-making process. However, the article delivers a military perspective on strategy development. Still, it does not exclude general information on the U.S. political arena, legal framework, scope of the documents, or historical facts. These data facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the complex political-military relations during the strategy-making process. The primary purpose of the article is to analyze coherent, layered strategic planning process during President Donald Trump administration (2017–2020) and draw significant conclusions, which other countries might implement in their planning system.

Keywords

EN

national defense; strategy; planning process; DIME; ends; ways; means; national power; security; grand strategy

PL

obrona narodowa; strategia; proces planowania; DIME; strategia bezpieczeństwa narodowego; strategia obronności; planowanie

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Świat Idei i Polityki
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 19
• Pages: 147-169

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Maciej Klisz

• The Polish Armed Forces

• https://orcid.org/0000000206722501

References

• BBC News US & Canada (2018, December 24). Trump’s campaign promises – has he delivered on them? Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37982000.
• Baylis, J. (2016, July). Strategy in Contemporary World. An Introduction to Strategic Studies. Oxford, 3–4.
• Boys, J. (2015, April 23). Clinton’s Grand Strategy: U.S. Foreign Policy in a Post- Cold War World, Bloomsbury Academic, 9.
• Boot, M. (2020, April 6). A Few Good Men. Trump, the Generals, and the Corrosion of Civil-Military Relations. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/2020-04-06/few-good-men.
• Clausewitz, C. (1989). On War. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 177.
• Copp, T. (2018, October 15). Mr. Secretary, are you a Democrat? Available at: https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/10/16/mr-secretary-are-youa-democrat/.
• Cordesman, A. (2018, January 19). The New National Defense Strategy: Some Good Broad Goals, and Bad Buzzwords, But No Clear Strategy. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/new-national-defense-strategy-some-good-broad-goalsand-bad-buzzwords-no-clear-strategy.
• Cruickshank, S. (2018, January 2019). U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis outlines bold new national defense strategy at Johns Hopkins. Available at: https://hub.jhu.edu/2018/01/19/jim-mattis-unveils-new-national-defense-strategy/.
• Drew, N. (1994). NSC-68: Forging the Strategy of Containment.Washington D. C: National Defense University.
• DuMont, M. (2019, February 28). Elements of national security strategy. Atlantic Council. Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/strategyconsortium/elements-of-national-security-strategy/.
• Earl, E. (1943). Makers of Modern Strategy. Princeton University Press.
• Gould, J. (2016, April 25). QDR Dead in 2017 Defense Policy Bill. Available at: https://www.defensenews.com/home/2016/04/25/qdr-dead-in-2017-defensepolicy-bill/.
• Gould, J., Shane, L. (2017, January 13). U.S. Congress Passes Waiver for Mattis to Lead Pentagon. Available at: https://www.defensenews.com/breakingnews/2017/01/13/us-congress-passes-waiver-for-mattis-to-lead-pentagon/.
• Goulston, M. (2017, December 30). Understanding Trump – The Hammer, the Nail and His Reality Distortion Field. Available at: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/understanding-trump-the-hammer-the-nail-and-his_b_5a473d7fe4b06cd2bd03dff1.
• Hart, L. (1991, March 30). Strategy. Plume, 321.
• Jaff e G. (2017, January 09). Response to 2011 deaths of U.S. troops shed light on Trump Pentagon pick. Available at: https://www.stripes.com/response-to-2011-deaths-of-us-troops-shed-light-on-trump-pentagon-pick-1.448010.
• Johnsen, W., Biddle, T. (2019). War, Strategy, and Theory: A Basic Introduction, 9.
• Joint Doctrine Note 1–18. (2018, April 25). Strategy, I-1, VII, II-8.
• Joint Doctrine Note 1–19. (2019, June 03). Competition Continuum, 2.
• Joint Publication 5–0. (2017, June 16). Joint Planning, XII.
• Karlin, M. (2018, January 21). How to read the 2018 National Defense Strategy. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/01/21/howto-read-the-2018-national-defense-strategy/.
• Lee, K. (2016, August 4). How deferments protected Donald Trump from serving in Vietnam. Available at: https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-donald-trumpmilitary-20160803-snap-htmlstory.html.
• NSA Archive. Available at: http://nssarchive.us/.
• Piotrowski, M. (2018, January 26). Changes in the Main Assumptions of the U.S. National Defense Strategy. The Polish Institute of International Affairs. Available at: https://pism.pl/publications/Changes_in_the_Main_Assumptions_of_the_U_S__National_Defense_Strategy.
• Stolberg, A. (2012, October). How nations craft national security strategy documents. Strategic Studies Institute, 15, 72.
• The 10 U.S. Code § 113. Secretary of Defense.
• The 10 U.S. Code § 153. Chairman functions.
• The 10 U.S. Code § 164. Powers and duties of Combatant Commands.
• The 50 U.S. Code § 3021. National Security Council.
• The 50 U.S. Code § 3043. Annual national security strategy report.
• The Goldwater-Nichols DOD Reorganization Act of 1986, part D.
• The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA edition 2015–2018).
• The National Defense Strategy 2008 and 2018 (unclassified extract).
• The National Military Strategy 2018 (unclassified extract).
• The National Security Act of 1947.
• The National Security Strategy 2017.
• The National Security Strategy NSC-68
• The Strategic Defense Review.
• U.S. Army War College. (2010). Strategic Leadership Primer 3rd Edition. Department of Command, Leadership, and Management, 1.
• U.S. Army War College (2018, January 18). How the Army runs. A Senior Leader Reference Handbook, 2–23, 2–11, 2–12.
• U.S. Army War College. (2019). War, Policy, and National Strategy Course (WPNS) Directive, AY20, A-8.
• Vego, M. (2017, September 20). Joint Operational Warfare. Theory and Practice, I-38.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/siip202007

Biblioteka Nauki

2190953