Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2006 | 10 | 115-130

Article title

New Construction of the POA Personality Questionnaire Based on the Rasch Model

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This paper discusses the usefulness of methodological seizing based on the logistic Rasch model in constructing of a new diagnostic tool: POA questionnaire (Pomiar Osobowości Autorskiej) is designed to examine the author’s personality based on Kazimierz Obuchowski’s personality theory. Basic foundations of the Rasch model will be presented, the information of theoretical and empirical bases of the new tool and example-results obtained using this model with reference to the created personality questionnaire. A theoretical basis of the psychological measurement was item response theory (IRT) – one of the theories of latent classes. The Rasch model comes from this theory. The psychometric properties of the data based on 2316 people investigated were analyzed using the computer programmes WINMIRA (supported by SPSS) and Mixed Rasch Model (MIRA). Both programmes were then used for scale development and validation. WINMIRA was used to examine the degree of fitting of the model to the POA questionnaire. Then it was possible to make the practical valuation of suitable parameters of the Rasch model by maximum likelihood methods using a series of iterative procedures.

Year

Volume

10

Pages

115-130

Physical description

Dates

published
2006

Contributors

  • Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz

References

  • Andersen, E. B. (1973): “A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model.” Psychometrika, No. 38, pp. 123-140.
  • Andrich, D. (1978): “A rating formulation for ordered response categories.” Psychometrika, 43, pp. 357–374.
  • Andrich, D. (1988): Rasch models for measurement. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hornowska, E. (1980): “Klasyczna teoria testów a model Rascha.” In: J. Brzeziński (eds.), Poznańskie Studia z Filozofii Nauki. Vol. 5: Z zagadnień psychologii ilościowej, pp. 117–130. W-wa: PWN.
  • Hornowska, E. (2001): Testy psychologiczne. Teoria i praktyka. W-wa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.
  • Konarski, R. (2004): “Model cechy latentnej w analizie psychometrycznej testów i pozycji testowych.” In: B. Niemierko, H. Szaleniec (eds. ) Diagnostyka edukacyjna. Standardy wymagań i normy testowe w diagnostyce edukacyjnej. Kraków: PTDE.
  • Lord, F. M.; Novick, M. R. (1968): Statistical theories of mental test scores. New York: Addison Wesley.
  • Maturana, H.; Varela, F. (1980): “Autopoiesis and cognition.” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 42, Boston. In: A. Skibiński. Umysł jako system autoreferencyjny. Referat na seminarium pt. “Czym jest umysł?” w Instytucie Filozofii i Socjologii PAN (17 I 2003).
  • Obuchowski, K. (1996): “Jednostka ludzka.” Czasopismo Psychologiczne, vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 47–59.
  • Obuchowski, K. (2005): Subject’s revolution. Łódź: Wydawnictwo WSHE.
  • Ożarowski, W. ((2005): “Zastosowanie modelu Rascha w konstrukcji narzędzia do badania osobowości zdrowej.” Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, vol XI, nr 2, pp. 242–255.
  • Ożarowski, W. (2006): POA – Pomiar Osobowości Autorskiej. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo UKW (in press).
  • Popper, K. (1986): Logika poznania naukowego. W-wa: PWN.
  • Rost, J. (1988): “Test theories with qualitative and quantitative latent variables.” In: R. Langeheine, J. Rost, (eds. ) Latent trait and latent class models. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Rost, J. (1996): Testteorie – Testkonstruktion. Bern.
  • Rost, J. (1990): “Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis.” Applied Psychological Measurement, No. 14, pp. 271–282.
  • Rost, J. (2002): “When personalisty questionnaire fail to be unidimensional.” Psychologische Beitrage, vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 108–125.
  • Rost, J.; Zeidler, W. (2006): “Osobowość autorska jako rodzaj autopoiesis.” Polskie Forum Psychologiczne. Vo. 11, No. 2
  • Smit, A., Kelderman, H., van der Flier, H. (2003) “Latent Trait Latent Class Analysis of an Eysenck Personality Questionnaire.” Methods of Psychological Research Online, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 23–50.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
29520303

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15804_tner_06_10_3_09
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.