Students’ Attitude Toward Cheating in Switzerland, Ukraine and Poland

• Authors: Agata Chudzicka-Czupała , Anna Lupina-Wegener , Silna Borter , Nadiya Hapon

Abstracts

EN

The article discusses the problem of academic dishonesty, which has been growing in Western Europe, North America, in the transitional economies of Eastern Europe and Central Asia. However, cross-cultural comparisons remain scarce, particularly with regard to the former communist countries. This paper presents an exploratory study on academic misconduct in Switzerland, Ukraine and Poland. The Academic Dishonesty Scale was used. A sample of 870 university students participated. The results reveal no differences between Ukrainian and Polish students in terms of attitudes toward cheating. Swiss students expressed significantly more negative attitudes. The results offer implications for the practice of moral awareness.

Keywords

EN

academic misconduct; attitude toward cheating; subjective social norms; cultural comparison

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 32
• Pages: 66-76

Dates

published

2013

Contributors

author

Agata Chudzicka-Czupała

• University of Silesia

author

Anna Lupina-Wegener

• Haute Ecole d’Ingénierie et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud, Switzerland

author

Silna Borter

• Haute Ecole d’Ingénierie et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud, Switzerland

author

Nadiya Hapon

• Ivan Franko Lviv National University

References

• Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: J. Kuhl, J. Beckman (Eds.). Action-control: From cognition to behavior (11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.
• Alleyne, P., & Phillips, K. (2011). Exploring Academic Dishonesty among University Students in Barbados: An Extension to the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9, 323–338.
• Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.
• Bieły, W. (2012). Міражі посттоталітарної школи:оболонки неправди. Українська правда,3-4, 19.01.2012.
• Bloodgood, J.M., Turnley, W.H., & Mudrack, P.E. (2010). Ethics Instruction and the Perceived Acceptability of Cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 23–37.
• Borkowski M., & Kaczmarczyk M. (2006). Raport: Uczciwość w szkole, Fundacja Rozwoju Edukacji i Szkolnictwa Wyższego oraz serwis edukacyjny zadane.pl., http://www.uczciwoscwszkole.pl/files/raport_zadane_pl_uczciwosc_w_szkole.pdf
• Brislin, R.W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In: W.J. Lonner, J.W. Berry (Eds.). Field methods in cross-cultural research. (137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Chyrowicz B. (2009). Etyka jako filozoficzny namysł nad moralnością. In: J. Brzeziński, B. Chyrowicz, W. Poznaniak, M. Toeplitz-Winiewska (Eds.). Etyka zawodu psychologa. (17–31). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; Reading.
• Grimes, P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in academics and business: A cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 273–290.
• Hapon, N., & Gorbaniuk, J. (2011). Psychological aspects of personal perception in the pedagogical relationship “student-teacher”. Unpublished paper presented at the “Modern educational technology in the training of future professionals” conference, Lviv.
• Harding, T.S., Mayhew, M.J., Finelli, C.J., & Carpenter, D.D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17, 3, 255–279.
• Haswell, S., Jubb, P., & Wearing, B. (1999). Accounting students and cheating: A comparative study for Australia, South Africa and the UK. Teaching Business Ethics, 3,3, 211–239.
• Koshmanova, T.S., & Hapon, N.P. (2007). Exploratory study of changing ethnic stereotypes of Ukrainian teacher candidates. Journal of Peace Education, 4,1, 75–95.
• McCabe, D.L., & Trevino, L.K. (1997). Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38,3, 379-396.
• Nunnally, J.C., & Berstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd edition). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
• Osipian, A.L. (2008). Political Graft and Education Corruption in Ukraine Compliance, Collusion, and Control. Demokratizatsiya, 16,4, 323-342.
• Parboteeah, K.P., Bronson, J.W., & Cullen, J.B. (2005). Does National Culture Affect Willingness to Justify Ethically Suspect Behaviors? A Focus on the GLOBE National Culture Scheme. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5,2, 123–138.
• Podoliak, L.H., & Jurczenko, V. (2006). Психологія вищої школи: навчальний посібник для магістрів і аспірантів. Київ: Філ-студія.
• Stone, T.H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14,3, 221–241.
• Williams, K.M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D.L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(3): 293–307.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.13.32.2.04

Biblioteka Nauki

26172373