Use of Mobile Technologies to Promote Scientific Discovery Learning in Elementary School

• Authors: June Lee , Yangmi Koo , Yong-Lyun Kim

Abstracts

EN

The purpose of the study was to identify educational effects of a new learning method that integrates mobile-technology-based science learning with activity oriented discovery learning. The major finding of the study was that the mobile technology-based Science program enabled students to learn scientific knowledge through associated activities and creatively apply their knowledge to complete the mission of the learning. Also, the study found that the use of tablet PCs and SNS for scientific inquiry activities facilitated students to learn in fun ways, to collaborate with other students, and to share what they have learned with each other.

Keywords

EN

mobile technology; discovery learning; Smart Science

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 32
• Pages: 264-274

Dates

published

2013

Contributors

author

June Lee

• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

author

Yangmi Koo

• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

author

Yong-Lyun Kim

• Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

References

• Benford, S., Duncan, R., Hull, R., Morrison, J., Facer, K., & Clayton, B. (2004). “Savannah”: designing a location-based game simulating lion behaviour. MobileBristol, Bristol.
• Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning: Learning through game cocreation and games in a playful learning environment, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5, 1–15.
• Kipnis, N. (2007). Discovery in science and in science education, Science & Education, 16, 883–920.
• Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching, Educational Psychologies, 41(2), 75–86.
• Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 485–529.
• Lave, J and Wenger, E (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Matthews, M.R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal, Journal of Science and Technology, 11(2), 121–134.
• Mayer, R.E. (2004). Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning?, American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
• Ministry of Education and Science of Korea (2011). National Plans for Smart Education.
• Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., & Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2006). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning, Futurelab Series Report 11.
• Pachler, N (ed) (2007) Mobile learning: towards a research agenda, London: WLE Centre, Institute of Education.
• Piaget, J. (1929). The Child’s Conception of the World. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
• Rudd, T.(2008). Reimagining outdoor learning spaces Primary capital, co-design and educational transformation, A Futurelab Handbook, Available online at www. futurelab.org.uk/resources.
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Edited Cambridge Mass, London: Harvard University Press

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.13.32.2.22

Biblioteka Nauki

26184010