Theoretical Framework for the Development of Community Sense

• Authors: Jan Sebastian Novotný

Abstracts

EN

The paper focuses on the quite original and not much discussed subject of the relationship between volunteerism and community sense, whose support in Czech society has great potential for the development and functioning of a humane-oriented civil society. First, the paper depicts both concepts and capacity of volunteering utilization in the development of the community sense. Then it emphasizes two promising ways of volunteering support that take into account the educational and developmental context. These are the development of prosocial values and positive shaping of youth happiness. As the presented findings indicate, the individual happiness impacts on both the individual’s prosocial orientation and willingness to volunteer that is enhanced also by prosocial values.

Keywords

EN

community; community sense; volunteering; prosocial values; happiness

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 33
• Pages: 63-74

Dates

published

2013

Contributors

author

Jan Sebastian Novotný

• University of Ostrava

References

• Balandin, S., Llewellyn, G., Dew, A., & Ballin, L. (2006). We couldn’t function without volunteers’: volunteering with a disability, the perspective of not-for-profit agencies. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29)2), 131.
• Bekkers, R. (2006). Traditional and Health Related Philanthropy: The Role of Resources and Personality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 349-366.
• Bem, D.J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62.
• Berry, D.S., & Hansen, J.S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 796–809.
• Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1024.
• Cameron, L.D., Brown, P.M., & Chapman, J.G. (1998). Social Value Orientations and Decisions to Take Proenvironmental Action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 675-697.
• De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P.A. M. (2001). Why Prosocials Exhibit Greater Cooperation than Proselfs: The Roles of Social Responsibility and Reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, S5-S18.
• DeJong, W. (1979). An examination of self-perception mediation of the foot-in-the-door effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2221-2239.
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
• Dunn, J.R., & Schweitzer, M.E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736–748.
• Eek, D., & Gärling, T. (2006). Prosocials prefer equal outcomes to maximizing joint outcomes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 321–337.
• Hartl, P. (1997). Komunita občanská a komunita terapeutická. Praha: SLON. Hockenos, P. (Ed.). (2001). State of the World’s Volunteerism Report Team. Bonn, Germany: United Nations Volunteers. Retrieved from http://www.unv.org/ fileadmin/docdb/pdf/2011/SWVR/English/SWVR2011_full.pdf
• Hooghe, M. (2003). Participation in Voluntary Associations and Value Indicators: The Effect of Current and Previous Participation Experiences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 47-69.
• Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2000). Genes, culture, democracy, and happiness. In E. Diener & E.M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 165–184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Ironmonger, D. (2006). The economic value of volunteering in Queensland. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
• Isen, A.M., & Levin, P.F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 384–388.
• James, H.S., & Chymis, A. (2004). Are happy people ethical people?: Evidence from North America and Europe. (Working Paper No. AEWP 2004-8). Columbia: University of Missouri, Department of Agricultural Economics.
• Kohn, M.L., & Schooler, C. (1982). Job Conditions and Personality: A Longitudinal Assessment of Their Reciprocal Effects. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 1257- 1286.
• Li, Y. (2004). Volunteering and mental health: Benefits of engagement or social selection?.
• Purdue University, p. 4354.
• Librett, J., Yore, M.M., Buchnre, D.M., & Schmid, T.L. (2005). Take pride in America’s Health: Volunteering as a gateway to physical aktivity. American Journal of Health Education, 36(1), 8-13.
• Liebrand, W.B. G., Jansen, R.W. T.L., & Rijken, V.M. (1986). Might over morality: The interaction between social values and the interpretation of decisionmaking in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 203-215.
• Mlčák, Z., & Pečtová, M. (2011). Některé výsledky výzkumu motivace k dobrovolnické činnosti u studentek pomáhajících oborů. Psychologie a její kontexty, 2(1), 1-10.
• Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., Rozario, P., & Tang, F. (2003). Effects of volunteering on the well-being of older adults. Series B: Psychological science and social sciences, 58B(3), p. S137.
• Myers, D.G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.
• Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press.
• Penner, L.A. (2002). Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism : An interactionist perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 447 – 467.
• Piliavin, J.A., & Callero, P.L. (Eds.). (1991). Giving Blood: The Development of an Altruistic Identity. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
• Rietschlin, J. (1998). Voluntary Association Membership and Psychological Distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 348-355.
• Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
• Ryff , C.D., & Singer, B. (1996). Psychological wellbeing: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 65, 14–23.
• Sak, P. (2000). Proměny české mládeže. Praha: Petrklíč.
• Schuyt, T.N. M., Smit, J., & Bekkers, R. (2004). Constructing a Philanthropy-scale: Social Responsibility and Philanthropy. 33d Arnova Conference. Los Angeles.
• Schwarzwald J., Bizman, A., & Raz, M. (1983). The Foot-in-the-Door Paradigm: Effects of Second Request Size on Donation Probability and Donor Generosity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 443-450.
• Thoits, P.A., & Hewitt, L.N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 115-131.
• Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The well-being of nations: Linking together trust, cooperation, and democracy. In B.A. Sullivan, M. Snyder, & J.L. Sullivan (Eds.), Cooperation: The political psychology of effective human interaction (pp. 323–342). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Uslaner, E.M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Van Lange P.A. M. (1999). The Pursuit of Joint Outcomes and Equality in Outcomes: An Integrative Model of Social Value Orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337-349.
• Van Lange P.A. M. (2000). Beyond self-interest: A set of propositions relevant to interpersonal orientations. In M. Hewstone, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (pp. 297-330). London: Wiley.
• Young, F.W., & Glasgow, N. (1998). Voluntary Social Participation and Health. Research on Aging, 20, 339-362.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.13.33.3.05

Biblioteka Nauki

18104468