Innovation in Biology and Environmental Education Didactics in Pre-Graduate Training of Secondary Biology Teachers in the Context of Current Changes in the Education System

• Authors: Ivo Machar , Jan Činčera , Olga Vránová , Vilém Pechanec , Helena Kiliánová , Jitka Málková

Abstracts

EN

The authors conducted a survey among graduates of Master’s courses in Teacher Education in Biology to determine their opinions on the importance of biology and environmental education didactics during their pre-graduate studies. Results of the survey indicated some existing deficiencies in pre-graduate teaching of biology and environmental education didactics and raised suggestions for innovation. The survey of 119 respondents was conducted in 2009. Most respondents considered the benefit of their pre-graduate Teacher Education in Biology degree sufficient for their own knowledge in biology, while considering the benefit of a pre-graduate course for their own pedagogic and didactic competencies a small one. The survey proved that most graduates of Teacher Education in Biology studies ranked the subject of biology didactics among the key modules of their pre-graduate degree course and identified several strengths and weaknesses in the teaching of biology didactics. The respondents who were professionally involved in Environmental Education viewed the absence of special didactics of environmental education and limited time allocation for teaching practice as shortcomings of their pregraduate course structure. Based on this research, two educational projects were designed, allowing for the implementation of innovated didactics of biology and environmental education together with specialized teaching practice for biology teacher education students in collaboration with several Czech universities and participating foreign lecturers.

Keywords

EN

didactics of biology and environmental education; innovation; biology teachers

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 37
• Pages: 31-42

Dates

published

2014

Contributors

author

Ivo Machar

• Palacky University

author

Jan Činčera

• Technical University of Liberec

author

Olga Vránová

• Palacky University

author

Vilém Pechanec

• Palacky University

author

Helena Kiliánová

• Palacky University

author

Jitka Málková

• University of Hradec Králové

References

• Broukalová, L.; Broukal, V.; Činčera, J. (2012). Objectives and Indicators for Environmental Education, Awareness Raising and Consulting in the Czech Republic. Prague: Ministry of Environment.
• Carvalho, M. (2008). Global Education Guidelines. Lisbon: North-South Centre of the Council of Europe.
• Činčera, J. (2007). Environmental Education: From Goals to Means. Brno: Paido.
• Disinger, J.F. (2005). Environmental Education’s Definitional Problem. In Hungerford, Harold H.; Bluhm, William J.; Volk, Trudi L.; Ramsey, John M. Essential Readings in Environmental Education (pp. 17-32). Champaign: Stipes.
• Eilam, E.; Trop, T. (2011). ESD Pedagogy: A Guide for the Perplexed. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42 (1), 43-64.
• Gallová, M.; Švecová, M. (1996). Concepts of Biology Teaching at Grammar Schools in CR. Biologie, chemie, zeměpis, 5(5): 202-204.
• Gnitecki, J. (1993). Zarys metodologii badań w pedagogice empirycznej. Zielona Góra: Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna.
• Grecmanová, H.; Urbanovská, E. (2007). Activating Teaching Methods and School Educational Programme Tools. Olomouc: Hanex.
• Hungerford, H.R.; Volk, T.L. (1990). Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3): 8-21.
• Chráska, M. (2007). Methods of Educational Research. Praha: Grada.
• Jakab, I; Kopcová, O. (2004). Didactics of Environmental Ecology. Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa.
• Kyriacou, CH. (1996). Key Teaching Skills. Praha: Portál.
• Koucký, J., Voříšek, P., Zelenka, M. (2008). University Graduates on the Labour Market. AULA, 16(2): 1-10.
• Machar, I. (2011). Environmental education for success in practice - an innovative project focused on preparing students of Palacky University in Olomouc. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4, 3: 92-94.
• Mareš, J. (1983). How to Determine Reliability of Observation? Pedagogika, 2: 35-42.
• Máchal, A.; Nováčková, H.; Sobotová, L. (2012). Introduction to Environmental Education and Global Development Learning. Lipka: Brno.
• Oravcová, J. (2004). Active Learning in the Preparation of Future Pedagogues. In Oravcová, J. (ed) Evalvácia v edukačnom procese vysokých škol (pp. 83-93). Banská Bystrica: Univerzita Mateja Bela.
• Orr, D.W. (2004). Earth in Mind. On Education, Environment, and Human Prospect. Washington: Island Press.
• Papáček, M. (2006). Demands for Contemporary Didactics of Biology. In Dargová, J. & Darák, M. (eds) Didaktika v dimenziách vedy a praxe (pp. 330-335). Prešov: Euroeducation.
• Papáček, M. (2010). Research-oriented Science Learning - a Road for Biological Education of Generations Y, Z and Alpha? Scientia in Educatione, 1(1): 33-49.
• Ryška, R., Zelenka, M., Lepič, M., Koucký, J. (2012). Employability and Placement of Charles University Graduates. Studie, Pedagogická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, 18 pp.
• Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching. Foundation of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57: 1-22.
• Švecová, M. (2001). Possibilities of Curriculum Innovation in Relation to Dynamic Development of Natural Sciences. Pedagogika, 51(3): 227-265.
• Urbanovská, E. (2004). Evaluation as Part of Professional Self-Reflection. In Oravcová, J. (ed) Evalvácia v edukačnom procese vysokých škol (pp. 24-33). Banská Bystrica: Univerzita Mateja Bela.
• Walterová, E. (1994). Curriculum. Transformations and Trends in an International Perspective. Brno: Komenium.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.14.37.3.02

Biblioteka Nauki

2031737