Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 37 | 54-65

Article title

New Measures for the Improvement of History Education for Chinese Students in South Korea

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The objective of this research was to find a more effective method for the teaching of history to Chinese students studying in South Korean universities. Questionnaire surveys and interviews were conducted to investigate those students’ level of knowledge and perceptions of Korean history. Then, in history classes, four teaching methods (comparative-historical, audiovisual, history and language, and rote memorization) were applied over two weeks. Before the treatment, Chinese students said that they liked the audiovisual teaching method the most, but after taking the classes, they preferred the teaching method comparing Korean and Chinese histories. Besides the finding that the comparative method was the most popular, the responses also showed that it was the most effective one in teaching history to Chinese students.

Year

Volume

37

Pages

54-65

Physical description

Dates

published
2014

Contributors

  • Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
author
  • Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
author
  • Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

References

  • Baildon, M., Loh, K.S., Lim, I.M., Inanç, G., & Jaffar, J. (2013). Controversial history education in Asian contexts. New York: Routledge.
  • Beauchamp, E.R. (2002). Comparative education reader. New York: Routledge.
  • Choi, G., & Moon, H. (2006). Descriptions of modern Korean history in Chinese history textbooks (1949-2003). History & Culture Research, 24, 392-399.
  • Hans, N.A. (2012). Comparative education: A study of educational factors and traditions. New York: Routledge.
  • Kandel, I.L. (1959). The methodology of comparative education. International Review of Education, 5 (3), 270-273.
  • Kim, J., & Jeong, Y. (2004). Korea and Korean history in recent Chinese history textbooks for middle and high schools. Research on Contemporary Chinese History, 23, 178-179.
  • Lange, M. (2013). Comparative-historical methods, Washington DC: Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Lee, H. (2004). History education using audiovisual materials. Seoul: Hyeahn.
  • Lee, G. (2005). The trend of research on modern Chinese history, China’s Northeast project and Sinocentrism. Seoul: Goguryeo Research Foundation.
  • Moon, H. (2011). Exploration of various educational measures for Chinese students in teaching modern and contemporary Korean history. Chinese Research, 51, 66.
  • Moon, H. (2012). The necessity and effectiveness of teaching the history of Joseon Dynasty to Chinese students studying in Korea. Chinese Research, 54, 66.
  • Moon, H. (2013). An investigation of diverse educational measures for the teaching of Korean history to Chinese students studying in Korea. History and Culture Research, 45, 300-301.
  • Ministry of Justice, Republic of Korea. (2013). Monthly statistical report on immigration foreign policy. Seoul: Ministry of Justice.
  • National History Compilation Committee. (2007). Korean history for high school. Seoul: Gyohaksa.
  • Oh, B. (2001). Description styles and perception of history in history textbooks for middle schools in China. History Education, 80.
  • Oh, J., & Gyo, J. (2011). Comparative linguistic research: Korean and Chinese languages as foreign languages. Seoul: Parkyijeong.
  • Park, J. (2003). History education on modern and contemporary Chinese history and Sinocentrism 2: Focusing on the issue of integrating the nation during the People’s Republic of China period. Research on Modern and Contemporary Chinese History, 20.
  • Renmin Educational Publisher History Office. (2003). Modern and contemporary world history (Vol. 1). Yanbian: Yanbian Educational Publisher.
  • Renmin Educational Publisher History Office. (2004). Modern and contemporary world history (Vol. 1). Beijing: Renmin Educational Publisher.
  • Sim, H. (1997). Lectures on Korean Annuals of Legislation. Seoul: Samyoungsa.
  • Shin, J. (2005). Three countries’ perception of colonization: development or exploitation? The perception of modern history and history education by Korea, China, and Japan. Seoul: Goguryeo Research Foundation.
  • Yu, Y. (2005). Perception of Korean history and Sinocentrism in history textbooks for universities in China. China’s Northeast project and Sinocentrism. Seoul: Goguryeo Research Foundation.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2031731

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15804_tner_14_37_3_04
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.