Peer Review Experiences for MOOC. Development and Testing of a Peer Review System for a Massive Online Course

• Authors: Enrique Sánchez Acosta , Juan José Escribano Otero , Gabriela Christie Toletti

Abstracts

EN

Although at first MOOC (Massive Open Online Courses) did not use peer reviews, this kind of assessment has increasingly demonstrated the benefits that it can contribute to this type of course by improving the learning process, increasing decisions making abilities, and developing several other academic skills. Other MOOC assessment instruments do not provide students with these opportunities. This paper discusses the results obtained by the most commonly used massive online course platforms, detailing their features and limitations, as well as the experience in the implementation and use of a peer review system for a course of more than 7300 students. This study also comments on how evaluation rubrics are created, along with the final results, and the impact of the inclusion of this type of evaluation in MOOC.

Keywords

EN

MOOC; evaluation; peer; automatism; massive

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 37
• Pages: 66-79

Dates

published

2014

Contributors

author

Enrique Sánchez Acosta

• European University, Spain

author

Juan José Escribano Otero

• Tidewater Community College, Spain

author

Gabriela Christie Toletti

• Old Dominion University, Spain

References

• Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. (2006). Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V. 2. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 4(3).
• Cuevas, R.F., & Mestaza, M. (2002). La evaluación científica y el sistema de revisión por pares. CSI Boletín, 46.
• Ezeiza, A. (2013). ¡Horror! ¡Me evalúa un Robot! Boletín SCOPEO No 85. Retrieved from http://scopeo.usal.es/horror-me-evalua-un-robot/
• Granger, S., Hung, J., & Petch-Tyson, S. (2002). Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (Vol. 6). John Benjamins.
• Guerrero, C.S. (2010). Aprendizaje cooperativo e interacción asincrónica textual en contextos educativos virtuales. Pixel-Bit: Revista de Medios Y Educación, (36), 53-67.
• Human Readers. (2013). Retrieved November 6, 2013, from http://humanreaders.org/petition/index.php
• Jordan, K. (2013). Synthesising MOOC completion rates. MoocMoocher. Retrieved July 24, 2013, from http://moocmoocher.wordpress.com/2013/02/13/synthesising-mooc-completion-rates/
• Knoch, U. (2009). Diagnostic writing assessment: The development and validation of a rating scale (Vol. 17). Peter Lang.
• Sánchez Acosta, E. (2013). MOOC: Resultados reales. Elearningeuropa.info. Retrieved from http://elearningeuropa.info/en/article/MOOC:-Resultadosreales
• Steinhart, D. (2000). Summary street: An LSA based intelligent tutoring system for writing and revising summaries. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Colorado.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.14.37.3.05

Biblioteka Nauki

2031730